International news doesn't know what to do:
The Indian nun 'gangrape' was self-inflicted by christoislamics, to frame Hindoos. But since the christian compulsive lying about that came out, international media wants to make sure that nuns themselves don't lose sympathy, by harping on and on about the latest case:
An 86 year old nun has been gangraped and then murdered and money was stolen from her.
Sadly for christomedia, it happened in the christian nation of South Africa.
Indian christomedia is especially heartbroken, since they don't know how to blame this on Hindoos now. And because it reflects poorly on christianism again, that compulsively-lying religion of gangrapists.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3049013/Nun-86-gang-raped-murdered-South-Africa.html
Anyway, important recurrent features to note in this latest case where a christo nun in christo South Africa was gangraped:
- The South African rapists were christians too (again, SA is a christian country). Maybe they were even converts of the nun's own mission.
- Christians also seem to have a consistently morbid penchant for terrorising elderly nuns.*
More proof that it is christians that gangrape their own (elderly) nuns.
* Then again, raping is an ancient tradition in christianism. And christians will readily even commit incest as per church documentation: IIRC medieval monks weren't allowed to even stay with their mums and sisters, because the church councils documented that their 'celibate' priesthood was so vile they were likely to rape their own relatives. Yes, here:
freetruth.50webs.org/C2b.htm
4 centuries before that too, things were little different:
web.archive.org/web/20111205025101/http://freetruth.50webs.org/B3c.htm#Morality
(As documented by Joseph Wheless, else McCabe.)***
That last page is full of summaries of historical facts by Joseph McCabe et al. It's a hysterical read, the way Joseph McCabe brings out the idiocy that is christianism, but nothing has changed since then.
*** INSERT: CORRECTION to the line "As documented by Joseph Wheless, else McCabe". Though the source is simply St Jerome, the specific quoted textblock can be found at the following link, an apparently long-defunct Australian site, which has carefully documented summaries of the lives of various famous popes and church fathers, by quoting directly from official sources (such as "Sex Lives of the Popes" by Nigel Hawthorne, the Catholic Encyclopaedia, etc).
Meanwhile, the W Bengal nun was apparently attacked by her own christian kind, and it was specifically Not a gangrape (and in fact, no one knows that it was a rape at all - no wonder the nun went about "forgiving" everybody as a PR exercise for christianism).
First though. The following was found via a statement quoted in Sumedha Sarvadaman's indiafacts article, and at facebook.com/TheNationalistView/posts/596503547152928
afternoonvoice.com/why-the-nun-was-raped.html
The rest at that link is also interesting. E.g.
Turns out it was just another case like that Orissa nun who was hired to claim she was 'gangraped' (to deflect attention from the christian murder of the Hindoo Swami Lakshmanananda) and then she backpeddled and said she wasn't gangraped after all, just raped, and then she was not raped after all, so the christomedia just carefully left her story and moved on to manufacturing something else. India's christomedia should be totally disbanded.
The details concerning the Indian nun 'gangraped' by christoislamics are even more convoluted. E.g. the bizarre fact of the 72 year old who magically was but 62 years old as per hospital records. (Wah? Maybe christianism wanted to evoke more sympathy by adding another decade to her dotage?) And more such weird goings-on -
afternoonvoice.com/who-raped-the-nun.html
The Indian nun 'gangrape' was self-inflicted by christoislamics, to frame Hindoos. But since the christian compulsive lying about that came out, international media wants to make sure that nuns themselves don't lose sympathy, by harping on and on about the latest case:
An 86 year old nun has been gangraped and then murdered and money was stolen from her.
Sadly for christomedia, it happened in the christian nation of South Africa.
Indian christomedia is especially heartbroken, since they don't know how to blame this on Hindoos now. And because it reflects poorly on christianism again, that compulsively-lying religion of gangrapists.
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3049013/Nun-86-gang-raped-murdered-South-Africa.html
Quote:Nun, 86, is gang-raped and murdered when robbers break in to steal from her missionary in South Africa(Speaking of South Africa: 2 or so years back, American and other international news was full of a prominent Indian Hindu (forgot his name) in South Africa - or some English-speaking African nation - who allegedly had had his wife murdered by mercenaries pretending to be thieves. But then the African court finally ruled based on evidence that the man had had nothing to do with the IIRC mugging/hold up that resulted in his wife's death. The fact that the African judge had cleared his name was reported only by one British newspaper as far as I know - when the husband returned/went to the UK a free man. <- Should file that under more international christomedia psyops against Hindus, and how christomedia barely ever retracts their lies, and certainly not with the same loudness in which christomedia peddled them.)
Sister Gertrud Tiefenbacher had been bound with a typewriter cord
Her body was discovered by other nuns at her mission in Durban
Police say octogenarian had been robbed of a small amount of cash
By Helen Moss For Mailonline
Published: 16:08 GMT, 21 April 2015
Anyway, important recurrent features to note in this latest case where a christo nun in christo South Africa was gangraped:
- The South African rapists were christians too (again, SA is a christian country). Maybe they were even converts of the nun's own mission.
- Christians also seem to have a consistently morbid penchant for terrorising elderly nuns.*
More proof that it is christians that gangrape their own (elderly) nuns.
* Then again, raping is an ancient tradition in christianism. And christians will readily even commit incest as per church documentation: IIRC medieval monks weren't allowed to even stay with their mums and sisters, because the church councils documented that their 'celibate' priesthood was so vile they were likely to rape their own relatives. Yes, here:
freetruth.50webs.org/C2b.htm
Quote:LEO III 795-816 Created a spiritual cesspool. Following this Pope's rule, the Council of Aix-la-Chapelle of 836 CE stated that many monasteries had become the haunts of homosexuals and that many convents had become little more than brothels where unwanted babies were killed and buried. The church introduced laws banning priests' mothers, aunts or sisters from living in the houses of priests, since even relatives of the clergy were unsafe as incest was so rife.
4 centuries before that too, things were little different:
web.archive.org/web/20111205025101/http://freetruth.50webs.org/B3c.htm#Morality
Quote:(4th century Saint) Jerome warned one Roman woman to never remain alone in a room with a priest. Should she find herself in such a situation, the woman was told to "plead that either her bowels or bladder needed relieving".
Christian women were not to be trusted either, according to Jerome. "Never enter the house or be in their company alone," he said.
To Jerome, the only women of virtue to be seen on the streets of Rome were not Christians but pagans.
(As documented by Joseph Wheless, else McCabe.)***
That last page is full of summaries of historical facts by Joseph McCabe et al. It's a hysterical read, the way Joseph McCabe brings out the idiocy that is christianism, but nothing has changed since then.
*** INSERT: CORRECTION to the line "As documented by Joseph Wheless, else McCabe". Though the source is simply St Jerome, the specific quoted textblock can be found at the following link, an apparently long-defunct Australian site, which has carefully documented summaries of the lives of various famous popes and church fathers, by quoting directly from official sources (such as "Sex Lives of the Popes" by Nigel Hawthorne, the Catholic Encyclopaedia, etc).
Meanwhile, the W Bengal nun was apparently attacked by her own christian kind, and it was specifically Not a gangrape (and in fact, no one knows that it was a rape at all - no wonder the nun went about "forgiving" everybody as a PR exercise for christianism).
First though. The following was found via a statement quoted in Sumedha Sarvadaman's indiafacts article, and at facebook.com/TheNationalistView/posts/596503547152928
Quote:Sumedha Sarvadaman
THE PLOT THICKENS! "Plot" as in literally it's mostly about land-Mafia. So the Editor of Afternoon Voice, Vaidehi Taman, who has been reporting from ground zero, raises the critical question - "Why the Nun was raped?"
afternoonvoice.com/why-the-nun-was-raped.html
Quote:Sister Superior of Convent of Jesus and Mary, also failed to describe the rapists inspite of broad light incidence. As per church sources, she has been asked to leave Ranaghat and keep quiet, as the culprits belong to same community.
The rest at that link is also interesting. E.g.
Quote: Published On: Mon, Mar 23rd, 2015Despite all that, christomedia was loud and shrill about an old nun gangraped by Hindoos etc.
Why the Nun was raped?
It is a big question that why the nun was raped if we put little stress on the ongoing theories. Still, there is no answer but speculations are many. Eight persons were detained in connection with the rape of a 72-year-old nun in a school at Ranaghat in West Bengal's Nadia district. Police officials claimed that it was not a case of gang-rape. Even the eye-witnesses, other nuns, too told that it was not a gang rape because only one person took the nun towards room and there after they don't know what happened; they just found her on floor. Through this statement, it has established that only one person had raped her.
Turns out it was just another case like that Orissa nun who was hired to claim she was 'gangraped' (to deflect attention from the christian murder of the Hindoo Swami Lakshmanananda) and then she backpeddled and said she wasn't gangraped after all, just raped, and then she was not raped after all, so the christomedia just carefully left her story and moved on to manufacturing something else. India's christomedia should be totally disbanded.
The details concerning the Indian nun 'gangraped' by christoislamics are even more convoluted. E.g. the bizarre fact of the 72 year old who magically was but 62 years old as per hospital records. (Wah? Maybe christianism wanted to evoke more sympathy by adding another decade to her dotage?) And more such weird goings-on -
afternoonvoice.com/who-raped-the-nun.html