• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kaun Banega Next PM
<!--emo&:thumbsup--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumbup.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='thumbup.gif' /><!--endemo--> AHMEDABAD: Corporate honchos Anil Ambani and Sunil Bharti Mittal on Tuesday showered praises on Gujarat Chief Minister Narandra Modi and termed
his leadership as a national level material.

Speaking at the valedictory session of the Fourth Vibrant Gujarat Global Investors Summit, Ambani said, "Narendrabhai has done good for Gujarat and what will happen if he leads the nation."

Today's news papers carried the news item that the Sikh P.M. is sick and heart-broken. It is going to be surgically fixed and so Pranab the slave will succeed the sikhandi. I saw his following profile on the web.

<b>a national disgrace - pranab mukherjee</b>

Posted by littleindian on December 30, 2008. |

from the party that will do or say anything to keep their muslim vote bank intact.
the voice of the pseudosecularist, negationist-in-chief, the Indian National Congress,

Term ‘Islamic terrorism’ wrong : Pranab

Press Trust of India | Kolkata, Dec 29 (PTI)

Describing as “unacceptable” the term ‘Islamic terrorism’, External Affairs Minister Pranab Mukherjee today said a “disinformation campaign” has been launched to vitiate the atmosphere and asked the people to protest it.

“Not only is this expression Islamic terrorism unacceptable, there should be protest against it. Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. The patriotism of Muslims is no less than others in the country,” Mukherjee told a programme to mark 200 years of the Bengali translation of the Quran here.

He said deliberate attempts were being made to vitiate the atmosphere but Islam, which preached love and communal harmony, was against terrorism. “Terrorism is against humanity.” He said universal brotherhood was the basis of Islam which attracted people all over the world to it.

Mukherjee said that after 9/11, people in Europe and US coined the phrase ‘Islamic terrorism’ and tried to project it was a conflict between Islamic and Christian civilisations. Challenging those who described Islam as a religion of fundamentalists, Mukherjee asked them to show which part of the Holy Book encouraged fundamentalism. PTI

through the hypocrisy of a Pranab Mukherjee
the terrorist from within - pranab mukherjee

Minister for External Affairs of India
Constituency: Jangipur in West Bengal
one of the 12 constituencies (out of entire 543 Parliamentary seats) with a Muslims majority.

and what was he doing when he made the statement?
he was attending a programme to mark a bengali translation of Quran,
it does not take two brain cells to recognise who his audience were.

not to create an universal brotherhood you moron,
but to terrorise the world to accept the islamic caliphate, the ummah wahida
this is what an Islamic scholar and thinker Maulana Wahiduddin Khan himself has admitted
“Muslims have gained nothing from terrorism”

you moron,
it is not only a conflict between Islam and Christians,
it is a conflict between Islam and Jews and Hindus and every other religion.

If India was their target,
why did the 10 spawns of evil that came over on 26/11 kill innocent Jews?

does this moron at all know who are or why they are the Taliban’s
does this moron know what is the ultimate aim of the AlQaeda?
does this moron know what religion are the Lashkar-e-Taiba
those that trained the 10 killers that landed on mumbai?

muslims practice religious tolerance?
is this moron aware that muslims do not accept the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
that they set out their own version in cairo 1990 - a declaration that does not guarantee EQUAL RIGHTS, but merely EQUAL DIGNITY
above all does not give a guarantee of FREEDOM OF RELIGION?
does this moron need a bigger proof of religious intolerance?

does this moron know the concept of Islamic Ummah or the Caliphate?
to have the entire world under the sharia law?
would this moron himself convert to Islam?
or live life of a ‘dhimmi’ - a second class citizen and forced to pay a ‘jizya’ tax?

does this moron think Ajmal Amir Kasab is a hindu? a christian? a jew?
or was Md Atta? or Mr Osama bin Laden or Abu Musab al-Zarqawi?

do they learn to hate and to kill in a catholic school or the madrassa?
did they kill in the name of Christ? or Buddha? or the 33 crore hindu gods and goddeses?

above all, does this moron know of the existence of the verses of Islamic laws of Jihad?
- that directs jihad against the rejecters (non - believers) of “truth after it has become evident to them”

for a minister to challenge that islam is a religion of fundamentalist, beggars belief.

come to my website you shameless hypocrite,
I have a verbal diarrhoea from a muslim fundamentalist that says it is.
proud to be a muslim fundamentalist, shat he.

islamic terrorism: a fundamentalist finds justification

3. I am proud to be a Muslim fundamentalist
I am a fundamentalist Muslim who, by the grace of Allah, knows, follows and strives to practise the fundamentals of Islam. A true Muslim does not shy away from being a fundamentalist. I am proud to be a fundamentalist Muslim because, I know that the fundamentals of Islam are beneficial to humanity and the whole world.

to accept and perpetuate the propaganda that Islam is a religion of peace
to appease his muslim vote bank, stinks of disgusting hypocrisy

it is an insult to every soul that died to the “cause for Islam” for centuries.

it is a national disgrace that the Minister for Foreign Affairs can so blatantly support
and broadcast the very propaganda that the “moderate muslims” would like to hide behind today.

with ministers like this,
India might as well lay down out the redcarpet to the next wave of terrorists
till someone in his own family gets a bullet through the head,
ONLY THEN he will confirm what he really believes.

Mr Mukherjee, and a nation that elects him,
deserves to be terrorised.

That’s why Vaid, who will turn 18 this April, doesn’t plan to vote for Mayawati, the self-proclaimed leader of her people, in the coming Lok Sabha elections. “I’m put off by her way of dressing and especially the way she talks,” Vaid says. “Mayawati just doesn’t have it.”

Instead she is most likely to cast the first vote of her life to Rahul Gandhi. “When you look at him, you think he can do something for young people like us,” she observes, “while if Mayawati becomes the prime minister, we would most likely have Delhi invaded by cows and buffaloes from the countryside.”

There is another reason why Mayawati must count out Vaid from her scheme of things. “Mayawati just talks Dalit, Dalit, Dalit and that reduces us to being just that,” she says, “but hello, we are also Hindus, we are also Indians.”

<!--emo&:ind--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/india.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='india.gif' /><!--endemo--> But all I can say is If someone who can incite me to write about him willingly or unwillingly and adds to his publicity either good or bad, is definitely to watch out for. With the declaration of general elections, I am expecting more fireworks from him. A grand rollover can be expected which can leave viewers, readers, surfers and listeners at his mercy.

Chow !

Why so:

'coz people in my country don't think centrally though every1 knows that central Govt job is better than any which changed for a shortwhile with economic boom.

Talking of economics which should also be projected to people of India by Election commission rather than projecting only stars to increase the no. of voters as this Parliamentary election is going to cost <!--emo&:o--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/ohmy.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='ohmy.gif' /><!--endemo--> 10000 crores to exchequer.

<!--emo&:ind--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/india.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='india.gif' /><!--endemo--> http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Advani-...how/4320033.cms

Advani inviting Manmohan Singh for a debate said, "I am ready for a live TV debate as is the norm in the United States."

The Left threw in its hat as well and said that it can't be left out from the debate. The Left said that since India is not a bipolar democracy, debate between only two parties won't work. It said that other important political parties cannot be ignored.

Advani had earlier described Manmohan Singh as the 'weakest Prime Minister ever'.
Cross posting....


<!--emo&Smile--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> Singh has been challenged by the BJP for a TV debate and the 76-year-old leader, who recently underwent a bypass surgery, is being asked by the saffron forces that why he was not contesting the Lok Sabha elections

While no leader is being projected as the Prime Ministerial candidate by the Third Front, the grouping is itself being ridiculed as an alliance still in search of a Prime Minister.

Targeting the fledgling Third Front on the issue of Prime Ministerial candidature, leaders of both the UPA and the NDA claim that it would collapse like a pack of cards on the leadership issue with several ambitious politicians in its ranks waiting for the 'big' opportunity.

Similarly, society has to get over its aversion to her. She should not be viewed with a bias and should be judged on her performance and politics. If she is not the best candidate to lead the country, the rejection should be based on honest criticism of her performance, lack of vision and policy, not blind bias.

Time to close this thread?

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)