1.
<!--QuoteBegin-Ishwa+Nov 17 2008, 11:41 PM-->QUOTE(Ishwa @ Nov 17 2008, 11:41 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Another group to be hunted to be put to justice is the media. Indian media has proved to be of such a low level of paparazzi papers and tabloid gossips to be found on the desks of waiting rooms of offices or the dentist.
I do not know the (political) colouring of NDTV[right][snapback]90313[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->NDTV, etcetera are all christian media - all the major English language media outlets in India are owned and funded by christos, both the local and foreign kind.
See
http://pseudosecularism.blogspot.com/2007/...-in-bharat.html
"What is media and who owns media in Bharat"
(Plus there's things one can infer about undeclared <i>persons</i> like Naxal Ram of Chindu infamy who twice married a christian.)
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I do not know the (political) colouring of NDTV, but these two reports below hit the mail or frustration of the ATS of Maharashtra and the Congress.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The only reason why NDTV thought it prudent to finally present some of the truth was because they saw the game was up and didn't want to sink with the ship they helped puncture. Also, it's a famous christocommunist tactic to occasionally tell the truth while lying most of the time - they think the occasional truth may buy them some credibility. Compulsive lying comes natural to christianism/cretinism.
2.
<!--QuoteBegin-ramana+Nov 18 2008, 02:44 AM-->QUOTE(ramana @ Nov 18 2008, 02:44 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Stepping back a little bit, there are some features which are odd in this "investigation". All the folks being pinned down on fake charges have a SASB/J&K connections- Pandey/Diwvedi, Lt Col. Purohit, Armed Forces and specifially Mil Inteliigence . Is this payback for being thwarted by the Jammu agitation? Is there a Cashmere (massa)connection?
[right][snapback]90326[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Islamoterrorists wanted to take more violent action against the Shri Amarnath Shrine Board/Jammu, but christogovt promised their islamic brethren - who are working for the common cause of destruction of Hindus and Hindu dharma - to avenge them, and hence christos of govt and media did this.
Also, due to the constant christomedia whining about imaginary Hindoo tewwowism, Hindu populace is kept in the dark as to what the islamoterrorists are doing to the Assamese Hindus and how Hindus in Orissa are being terrorised by the christoterrorists.
Double purpose:
1. Real terrorism is concealed carefully by christomedia.
2. Fake terrorism (a la the christo accusations of 'persecution' against Ancient Romans) is instead being given all the time.
This is part of the christoterrorist archive/history-rewriting method. Just like christos are writing pages upon pages in wackypedia about persecution of christians, including how the French Revolution was also supposedly 'christian persecution'. (Rather, it was a chance for France to break free from the terrible centuries of oppression by christianism, but as the revolution was unable to escape influence by christo-conditioned elements, it just became all messy.)
In reality, christianism is the greatest terrorism the world has ever known. When considered alongside christianism's record, islamism looks like a raging murderous juvenile delinquent would next to a seasoned, experienced sociopath. That is, islamism is the younger version of christianism's matured criminal.
3. I missed this crucial post yesterday.
<!--QuoteBegin-Bodhi+Nov 16 2008, 10:41 PM-->QUOTE(Bodhi @ Nov 16 2008, 10:41 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let me tell you one more thing. Reaction from the majority Hindus is not that of shame but relief, hearing of this "Hindu terrorism". Like always, obsessed Media has missed the public pulse. More they continue to harp on the Hindu Terrorism, more will be such reaction. <b>Thankfully Hindus are no more supposed to ride on some fictious moral horses. Fine, we are terrorists. Now what next?</b>[right][snapback]90253[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Not only you, but Rajeev2004 and several English-enabled Hindus writing on Hindu sites are saying the same in their exasperation/desperation/elation.
I am in such violent disagreement concerning that last statement in the above quoteblock.
It is the worst possible argument. It is very, deeply, utterly wrong.
a. Neither you/Hindus, nor I are terrorists. It is a lie to admit to something we are innocent of. Why would Hindus take upon themselves this lie when it not only utterly untrue, but also when the very real islamoterrorists and christian terrorists (like those who murdered our Swami Lakshmanananda) keep denying they are terrorists? The christoarchive wants to pin Hindus with this foolishness for posterity, while they seek to be let off the hook in their false history-writing. And some Hindus are handing them this. What is wrong with such people that they can thoughtlessly do such a thing?
b. Sadhvi and Upadhyay and Purohit have refused to confess in spite of being tortured. And the first two have publicly professed their innocence (Purohit has not been allowed to address the public in the media reports I've read - they only print the words ATS attributed to him, so that the public won't get to see the disparity between the 2nd-hand alleged confessions and his own 1st-hand public denial of all accusations and any guilt).
These three have defied the attempts at character assassination, denied the false accusations, undergone mental torment, have borne physical torture and survived planted 'evidence' - *not only* for the sake of the integrity of their own character/reputations but also because they have realised how the christoterrorist government is willing to stoop even to falsely incriminating and punishing innocents, all in order to smear the entire Hindu community and Hindu Dharma with the manufactured notion of 'Hindu terrorism'.
http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/world-..._100114571.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Sadhvi faints in court as Shiv Sena, BJP activists protest"
<b>The Sadhvi, who argued her own case, however, told the court that she and the two others arrested along with her were innocent and were being implicated as part of a larger game to defame Hindutva movement.</b>
[...]
She also alleged torture on the part of the ATS sleuths during her interrogation before and after her formal arrest.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->They have withstood all of the nightmare presented them, to protect what they hold sacred: truth, and consequently Hindu Dharma and fellow Hindus.
Surprising how ungrateful some Hindus are: while the accused Hindus are fighting valiantly not only for their own innocence but against the intended slandering of the entire Hindu community, the ungrateful Hindus are willing to sell Sadhvi, Upadhyay and Purohit and the others falsely implicated by christogovt. The ingrate Hindoos who say "so what" about the utterly false allegations of Hindu terror are basically joining the christoterrorist media chorus both in disbelieving these forbearing Hindus' protestations of innocence (thus calling them 'terrorists') and thereby helping to perpetuate the false accusations against them. Such Hindoos are the falsest of friends: the undeserving Hindoos are making a mockery of the hardships faced and negating the efforts expended by the unrighteously implicated, who've been subjected to and withstood the torments of cruel christian lies and tortures by the christomedia, christogovt and ATS. One wonders why Purohit and/or Upadhyay didn't just say to the ATS "Give me the money you offered in exchange for my reputation and to avoid torture. I'll confess to anything, those ungrateful Hindus aren't worth defending." Perhaps Sadhvi should similarly have said "No Thanks" to the torture, and issued a "What do I care if you'll call all the Hindus 'terrorists', arrest them and torture them - they'll sell me and my character the first chance they get anyway." They could have spared themselves so much grief if they had just given in to the christoterrorism.
After all the accused Hindus have suffered for their perseverance to safeguard the Truth, after all their insistence on their innocence, this is what they get? To be doubted and sold as "Hindu terrorists" by <b>some vocal Hindoos who merely want to score cheap debating points because they think a community-wide self-admission to such criminal accusations (with far-reaching consequences) sounds like a clever retort</b>? (And this is exactly what christoislamicommunism wants Hindus to do.) What acid are such people on? They sell Hindu Dharma's reputation so cheaply without the slightest warrant and without giving the matter any serious thought, when better people than them have worked so hard at great personal expense to defend its pristine character.
But fortunately, Sadhvi and others' efforts to fight the lies have not gone to waste: most of the Hindus out there are not ungrateful and do not rubbish their tireless actions to preserve truth and Hindu Dharma's reputation. Neither do such Hindus bring Sadhvi et al's steadfastness and valorous suffering to nought by issuing trite declarations of believing in the existence of some imaginary Hindoo Terror. These Hindus not only believe in Sadhvi and the others thus wronged, but also in themselves - the very thing Sadhvi has fought to preserve: the general Hindu community's right to continue to believe in its innocence from unreal crimes.
c. Terrorism is cowardice. It is a christoislamic tactic.
Hindus are not cowards/pacifists. They would never shrink from retaliatory violence when it is called for. Just as they would not shrink from answering a call to war - the kind that's been issued repeatedly by christoislamism. But neither do Hindus commit terrorism, which is indiscriminate instigatory violence against random (innocent) people. Only cowards would do that or defend such behaviour.
And it ought to be the case that only characters with zero foresight and bad taste could be pleased with - let alone accept - titles of "Hindu terrorism". The sort of small-minded people, who, while cheering labels of terrorism (=cowardice) thrown at them, can not bring up the *courage* to direct their efforts in the only fight that can bring us any victory: that of exposing christoislamism. Such an action would just sound too unsecular to them, I'm sure. At least you'd think that the sort of silly Hindoos who are able to promote such false and dangerous notions as 'Hindu tewwowism' would have the soundness of mind to openly call for expelling christoislamism completely. But no: while they are willing to be considered thoughtlessly violent and willing *us all* to be regarded as thoughtlessly violent, they are not willing to be effective (effectiveness does not require violence, but it does require <i>zero</i> tolerance for ideologies of intolerance).
I don't care who I offend with writing point 3 above. People who are okay with being unjustly called Hindoo Tewwowists couldn't possibly be offended by my pointing out obvious things.