More <b>christian</b> terrorism. Christian terrorists manhandle Radha Rajan (editor of <i>VigilOnline</i>).
1.
http://vijayvaani.com/FrmPublicDisplayAr...spx?id=423
See original for the Editor's own highlighting.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>A 'state' of Constitutional breakdown and lawlessness</b>Â Â Â Â
B R Haran
07 Mar 2009
'Brahmin Dog! Brahmin Dog! Subramanian Swami Brahmin Dog!
Anti-Tamil Brahmin Dog! Subramanian Swami Brahmin Dog!
Get away, get away! Rajiv killer get away!â
These were the slogans raised inside court room 3 of Madras High Court by a team of lawyers who threw eggs on Dr. Subramanian Swami, who was seeking to implead himself in support of the Dikshitars in the Chidambaram Temple case, listed for hearing on 17 February 2009.
A group of lawyers belonging to pro-LTTE political parties and outfits has been boycotting the court proceedings thereby preventing other sincere lawyers from doing their duty, since January end. They have been engaged in a daily practice of going around the corridors in procession inside the Madras High Court shouting slogans against the Sri Lankan government and in support of Sri Lankan Tamils (read LTTE).
<b>These same lawyers are also supporting the government's takeover of the Chidambaram Temple.</b> On learning that Dr. Swami was going to implead himself in the Chidambaram case, they utilised the moment with the triple motive of attacking Dr. Swami for his anti-LTTE stand, abusing the Brahmin community, <b>and preventing the Chidambaram Temple case from being taken up for arguments.</b>
(This is VERY MUCH christianism. Well-planned and executed to make it <i>look</i> like it is merely the usual sort of hamitic 'dravidoid'=christian hooliganism.)
They entered the third court shouting slogans, threw a number of eggs on Dr. Swami's face, and some eggs near the well of the room, spoiling the records and furnitures. A few lawyers pushed him from behind and tried to assault him. When police officers attempted to protect Dr. Swami, unruly lawyers thrashed Assistant Commissioner Kadar Mohideen, pushed him, and prevented other officers from entering the court hall. Some more lawyers who swelled inside the hall attempted to close the other entry to prevent the personal security guards of Dr. Swami, who has 'Z' category security cover, from entering the hall.
Smt. Radha Rajan, Editor,
www.vigilonline.com, Smt. Uma Anandan, Sri T R Ramesh and this writer, who were present in the visitors' section, objected to the lawyers' abusing the Brahmin community inside the courtroom. <b>A male lawyer assaulted Smt. Rajan, and when we tried to protect her some blows landed on our hands too. The lawyers threatened and abused us. A female lawyer attempted to pounce on Smt. Rajan and hurled more derogatory remarks.</b> The melee lasted about fifteen to twenty minutes; finally the unruly mob vacated the hall.
Later, the division bench allowed the personal security guards of Dr. Swami to take positions around him. Dr. Swami complained about the ugly incident and requested the bench to pronounce an order as everything happened in the presence of the honourable judges. He requested adjournment of the case as there was no security for him and other litigants inside the court hall. He told the division bench that he would take up the issue with the Supreme Court. Mr. Justice P K Mishra was very critical and asked the government pleader Raja Kalifullah to explain why police protection was not given.
The government pleader replied that, âThe police need the permission of the Chief Justice to enter the hall, as there is an earlier order restricting the police from entering the court room and the available police is enough only to give protection outside the hall and for protecting the advocates,â When Justice Mishra reminded him of the presence of a posse of policemen seeing their own officer getting thrashed by unruly lawyers, the pleader said, âIt is very unfortunate that a respectable person like Dr. Swami has been attacked.â
For this the bench criticised the government pleader and said, âthe respectability of a person is immaterial. Even a hardcore criminal who is present in the court attending his case must be given protection.â It asked, âdoes the government expect this court to remind it of its duties?â and added, âit is a shameful incident. No right thinking citizen would tolerate this type of an incident and it is a national shame.â
Adjourning the Chidambaram case for further hearing on 19 February 2009, the judges said they would also forward their order to the acting Chief Justice to take severe action against lawyers involved in the shameful act. They said the order would be sent to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as well.
Coming out of the court hall, Dr. Swami addressed the press and said, âThe attack is a clear indication of the breakdown of Constitution and prevalence of lawlessness in the state under the DMK government. There is no security for litigants even inside the court hall. If a bunch of unruly elements including lawyers could disrespect the law, dishonour the court and act in defiance of the Constitution, then one can imagine what sort of governance is happening and how the law and order situation has deteriorated in the state. A group of lawyers have been preventing the functioning of the courts for the last two to three weeks and they have been supporting the cause of a terrorist organisation of another country at the cost of the rights and interests of the citizens of this country and this is an act, which has resulted out of anti-national attitude.â
Condemning the incident, he said, âThe DMK government doesn't have the right to continue in office any more and it deserves to be dismissed.â He reminded the people that both Chief Minister Karunanidhi and his son M K Stalin have taken central police protection as they do not repose trust and confidence in the state police force, and asked, âwere these policemen not Tamils?â
Dr. Swami, who faced severe attacks and humiliation during Indira Gandhi's emergency and Jayalalithaaâs first tenure (in the same High Court premises), was undaunted by the attack by âDravidianâ lawyers who tried to take the law in to their own hands. He said he would lodge a complaint with the Bar Council and demanded the impugned lawyers be debarred for life.
In this context, it may be noted that a few months ago a magistrate of the district sessions court in Chennai was assaulted by an advocate; the judiciary, instead of bringing the concerned lawyer to book, preferred a âdialogueâ with the lawyers for an amicable solution! Such a compromising attitude only emboldens advocates and the assault upon police inside the court premises is only further evidence of the deterioration of ethical standards among the legal fraternity.
The recent incident in Law College, involving law students, is a grim indicator of what lies ahead. Even as Dr. Swami was addressing the media, many lawyers could be seen abusing him, hurling invectives at him and the Brahmin community, and blaming the media for giving him more space. At the same time, a section of law-abiding advocates were visibly upset at the happenings and aired their anger privately over the conduct of the unruly section of their fraternity.
Meanwhile, acting on the complaint of Assistant Commissioner Kadar Mohideen, the city police has arrested a lawyer named Kiniliyo Immanuel for alleged involvement in the incident; he is among the twenty lawyers against whom the police have registered cases.
The BJP was the only political party which condemned the attack on Dr. Swami; even the main opposition AIADMK refrained. The state BJP blamed the government for not providing security and alleged that the government itself might have been behind this incident. Certainly the state government fears Dr. Swami might win the case in favour of the Dikshitars and thus save the Chidambaram Temple from hostile takeover, much in the manner in which he triumphed over the UPA government in the Setu Samundram case and helped protect the sacred Rama Setu.
The author is a senior journalist; he lives in Chennai<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Meanwhile, people will keep thinking all this is just a psecular coincidence. There's a reason to out crypto-christianism everywhere it exists, but Hindus will insist on protecting it by protecting crypto-christians' christian identities. This sort of thing is the direct result of Hindus' psecular attitude of protectionism towards christianism. Psecularism is a conscious choice and its consequences are not neutral, not innocent, not slight. It makes the victims give a direct hand in helping the christian genocide of Hindu Dharma.
2.
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/03/int...mission-of.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Intimidation at the Judicial Commission of Enquiry - Radha Rajan</b>
mar 4th, 2009
dmk/christist barbarians -- after their nazi attack on subramaniam swamy calling him a 'brahmin dog', i believe led by one <b>immanuel</b> -- continue with their antics.
of course, the atlanticist's pakistan-lover is there to duly bless the christist/crypto-christists' assault on hindus as appropriate. (and yet one more india-pakistan-equal-equal epistle from him). this james astill is the worst bigot who has been a reporter in india, even worse, arguably, than the execrable barbara crossette:
http://www.economist.com/daily/columns/asi...216124&fsrc=nwl
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:
From:
Radha Rajan,
Editor,
www.vigilonline.com,
To:
The Commissioner of Police, Chennai,
Shri Radhakrishnan.
                   <b>Sub: Why was there no police in the venue of the judicial enquiry?</b>
Mr. Commissioner, Namaskar.
I wish to register my very strong protest that there was no police inside the premises of the Justice Srikrishna Judicial Enquiry Commission constituted to look into the events of February 19.
I, Radha Rajan, Smt. Uma Anandan, Shri T Ramesh and Shri BR Haran, came to the venue on Greenway's Road to depose before Justice Srikrishna. There was great hostility to our presence.
In the afternoon a group of lawyers approached us menacingly wanting to know why we were present at the venue and who had invited us. They asked the Registrar Shri Vijayan to evict us. The Registrar tried to make them see reason and spoke persuasively but without success.
The situation was fast becoming ugly and the Registrar, instead of making sure that we were allowed to exercise our constitutional right to depose before the Commission actually asked us to leave. He asked us to give our deposition in writing which he said he would hand over to Justice Srikrishna.
The group of lawyers continued to intimidate us by asking us why we were there, in what capacity and what were we going to say to Justice Srikrishna and when we refused firmly to discuss anything with them and also politely told the Registrar that we were not leaving until we had deposed before the Enquiry Commission, the situation was tense and really ugly.
Mr. Commissioner, I am surprised that the advocates took the position that the Commission of Enquiry has been constituted only for them to depose before Justice Srikrishna with regard to the events of February 19. They did not want any one to raise the events of February 17 which alone caused February 19.
Knowing that these lawyers were capable of unleashing violence at the drop of the hat, I am surprised Sir and appalled that there was no police in the venue. The situation could have turned very violent. I am unable to understand how, when no person inside the venue had the capacity to protect ordinary citizens from these violent lawyers, is it possible to conduct a fair and impartial enquiry if these lawyers were going to frighten away individuals and groups who they thought could influence the commission in a manner detrimental to their goal.
I am sorry the police did not think it was necessary to be present to protect ordinary citizens. You have, with your absence, allowed the lawyers to control the venue and have in fact given them the authority to decide who will be present, who will depose and what will be said.
Please forgive me my strong language Sir. But after the violence in Court Hall 3 about which we came to depose before Justice Srikrishna, to be intimidated by lawyers again at the venue of the commission of enquiry, in the presence of the Registrar, makes me wonder how an entire state and its administrative mechanism can be held hostage by a few hundred lawyers who will not hesitate to unleash violence ofwhen crossed or challenged.
I register my strong protest Sir and outrage.
respectfully,
Radha Rajan.
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 3/04/2009 06:16:00 PM 0 comments<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
3.
http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?P...303&SKIN=B
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Let the whole world know - Lawyers as Lawbreakers</b>
04/03/2009 15:14:16Â
YOU TUBE ON LAWYER VIOLENCE , CHENNAI (19 FEBRUARY 2009)
1. Lawyer Violence 1 (Shouting derogatory slogans and demanding the arrest of Dr.Swamy, Justice P K Mishra and Justice K Chandru)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qxz0_D5tK6A
2. Burning a bike (Lawyers burning a bike presumably belonging to a policeman; showing a vulgar action with the cap of a police man)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OH5Lfvczg...re=channel
3. Madras Maaveeran (A lawyer menacingly advancing and challenging the police shouting filthy words)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vw8g9JnwE...re=channel
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
4. Meanwhile christoterrorist-presence in AP looks to support their christoDMK/LTTE lawyer brethren in TN:
http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx...eID=8277&SKIN=B
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>For Whom are the Lawyers Protesting in the Country for?</b>
26/02/2009 14:59:26Â Dr M V Soundararajan - Convener, TEMPLES PROTECTION MOVEMENT
Legal Fraternity is requested to clarifyâ¦.
This is in reference to the call by the Members of the Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh to observe âprotest dayâ on February 27 by wearing black badges expressing resentment towards the so called âbrutal attackâ by police on lawyers in the Madras High Court. We feel this call is a one sided one.
The fact is, on 17th February, a Lawyer (Subhramaniam Swamy) was attacked in the Court in Chennai. This Lawyer was appealing against the Government Take over of Chidambaram Temple before a Division Bench in the Madras High Court. He was humiliated by a Section of Lawyers and inhumanly attacked inside the Court hall in front of the Judges. This attack that happened should be seriously condemned first and also the one that happened on 19th February which is a corollary of the earlier incident. The clash of the Police and the Legal fraternity happened when the Police came to arrest a bunch of the attackers.
Andhra Pradesh is a State which has âGod Consciousnessâ. Hence, we would like to request the Legal Fraternity of our State to clarify on which incident they would be protesting before proceeding with their program of action scheduled on 27/02/09.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
There are comments at both HaindavaKeralam links.