Indian Missile News And Discussion - Printable Version +- Forums (http://india-forum.com) +-- Forum: Indian and International Forces (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: Military Discussion (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: Indian Missile News And Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=182) |
Indian Missile News And Discussion - Guest - 03-19-2010 [quote name='Arun_S' date='19 March 2010 - 03:15 AM' timestamp='1268948246' post='105271'] Shiv Aroor is referring to 3 D rendering of Agni -2 m dia missile and warheads, that were generated from my 2 D drawing dimensions (I had the same 3 D renderings from one of the BRFite who generated it for me, to put on-line) I never got change to incorporate the 3 D rending in my web article, before I left BR in disgust. The person has since then given teh rending to SHiv Aroor for wider dissemination. [/quote] I never saw these drawing before, neither on BR nor anywhere else, until I came across SHIV AROORôs site. SHIV AROOR is connected with inner circle of DRDO.... Indian Missile News And Discussion - Guest - 03-20-2010 I have noticed those slits on the nosecones of all Indian missiles. I have seen a Dhanush up close, and it had those in the nosecone. Any suggestions as to what their function is? That hole at the bottom of the RV seems to be a guidance / stabilizing exhaust of some kind right? Apparently the RV needs to be maneuvered late in the ascent phase so that the nose tip points in the right direction during descent. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-20-2010 For viewing pleasure of IF members are few 3 D rendering of missiles by Alok C. based on missiles line drawings in my articles (that were earlier hosted on BR). For description pls see: [url="http://s26.photobucket.com/home/Arun_S/index"]My link[/url] All following 3D rendering of Arun_S Missile and warhead diagrams by Alok C. Prithvi launch Prithvi Agni-1 liftoff Agni-1 Agni-2 separated from second stage hypersonic boost glide RV Agni-2 with hypersonic boost glide RV Agni-2 with hypersonic boost glide RV Agni-2 with hypersonic boost glide RV Agni-3A MIRV Agni-3A MIRV Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-20-2010 part-2 Agni-3B MIRV Agni-3B MIRV Agni-3 SUM firing with MIRVs Agni-3B MIRV Agni-3B MIRV Agni-3C MIRV Agni-3C MIRV Agni-3SL MIRV Agni-3SL MIRV Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-20-2010 Agni-3SL MIRV Agni-3SL MIRV Agni-3 TD liftoff Agni-3 TD Agni-3 TD sections Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-20-2010 Having access to above images do not have any bearing on possibility if I have or do not have deep source in DRDO, or my technical ability to be able to connect the dots from public source material. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Guest - 03-20-2010 Source: NASA Indian Missile News And Discussion - sai_k - 03-21-2010 Arun_S, On your Agni-3-SL analysis (from your link photos), could you please let know why its weapons configuration do not carry 6 estimated MIRV payload and it has only 2? Indian Missile News And Discussion - emperor - 03-21-2010 [quote name='sai_k' date='21 March 2010 - 08:30 AM' timestamp='1269177774' post='105323'] Arun_S, On your Agni-3-SL analysis (from your link photos), could you please let know why its weapons configuration do not carry 6 estimated MIRV payload and it has only 2? [/quote] Cos the other 4 were already dropped on chinks <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='' /> Indian Missile News And Discussion - Guest - 03-22-2010 Range issues on the SL version? So that perhaps the SL version can still hit Harbin from the Bay of Bengal? Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-22-2010 [quote name='sai_k' date='21 March 2010 - 07:00 PM' timestamp='1269177774' post='105323'] Arun_S, On your Agni-3-SL analysis (from your link photos), could you please let know why its weapons configuration do not carry 6 estimated MIRV payload and it has only 2? [/quote] The number of petals carried in the flower pod depends on end user to trade off range V.s. net destructive effect AND reliability of warhead (you know that bug fixed TD design that has not been tested is of certain confidence level onlee {courtesy R Chidambaram and his BARC crew}) The line diagram drew 2 payload to show a confign that is optimized for longer end of the range (given Agni-3SL is limited on volume and thus stage fuel. 4 or 6 petals are very much possible. but pls also consider decoys that will be carried on board. [quote name='Gagan' date='22 March 2010 - 03:27 AM' timestamp='1269208179' post='105335'] Range issues on the SL version? So that perhaps the SL version can still hit Harbin from the Bay of Bengal? [/quote] Correct. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-22-2010 [url="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/BrahMos-cruise-missile-test-fired-successfully/articleshow/5709080.cms"]BrahMos cruise missile test-fired successfully[/url] Quote:TNN, Mar 22, 2010, Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-22-2010 [size="4"][color="blue"][/color][/size][url="http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2010032260770100.htm&date=2010/03/22/&prd=th&"][size="4"][color="blue"]Vertical launch of BrahMos missile successful [/color][/size][/url] Quote:T.S. Subramanian Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-22-2010 March 22, 2010 [url="http://beta.thehindu.com/news/article261220.ece?css=print"]First phase of ballistic missile shield to be deployed in 2012[/url] Quote: HYDERABAD, March 22, 2010 Indian Missile News And Discussion - vasu_ray - 03-22-2010 it sounds an aegis kind of system is being put in place, any chance that a scramjet powered AAD will see light once the hypersonic brahmos-2 succeeds? hopefully existing ship designs with IN with VLS can support aegis role once PDV comes to light then we would know if its close to Dhanush or smaller sized Shaurya, while, Shaurya is yet to be ship launched Dhanush is yet to be canister launched from a ship Indian Missile News And Discussion - Guest - 03-22-2010 [quote name='Arun_S' date='20 March 2010 - 06:46 AM' timestamp='1269047296' post='105295'] Having access to above images do not have any bearing on possibility if I have or do not have deep source in DRDO, or my technical ability to be able to connect the dots from public source material. [/quote] The guy (Shiv Aroor) is well connected with defense institutions! several times you find stuff from him not available in mainstream media. Just got off the phone with BrahMos CEO Dr A Sivathanu Pillai..... http://livefist.blogspot.com/2010/03/naval-brahmos-fired-with-supersonic.html Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-22-2010 [quote name='vasu_ray' date='22 March 2010 - 01:22 PM' timestamp='1269243880' post='105352'] it sounds an aegis kind of system is being put in place, any chance that a scramjet powered AAD will see light once the hypersonic brahmos-2 succeeds? hopefully existing ship designs with IN with VLS can support aegis role once PDV comes to light then we would know if its close to Dhanush or smaller sized Shaurya, while, Shaurya is yet to be ship launched Dhanush is yet to be canister launched from a ship [/quote] IIRC Shoura's twin Sagarika has been tested quite a few time from submerged depths, much easier to launch those canisters from surface vessels. Fro ABM purposes range is not the issue (so SCRAM jet is less interesting), acceleration is (aka solid fuel & high thrust engines). Indian Missile News And Discussion - Lalitaditya - 03-23-2010 Given Our current threat scenarios, will we need a Aegis type sea-based missile defence system? Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 03-23-2010 Indian nuclear deterrence involves scenario implicit with pre-emptive attack on India by forces far and near, and Indian response posture is also omni directional. So ABM defense sensors and interceptors have to circle around Indian borders. Sea gives the element of unpredictability of unknown ABM formation location, thus is advantageous. apart from providing more space to bring down aggressor missile. Indian Missile News And Discussion - sai_k - 03-23-2010 Thanks for the petal config answer Arun ji. I didn't think about decoys when I asked ( assuming our petals are so advanced and stealthy enough to dodge the re-entry to target. Of course mid-course engagement against long ranged ABMs is another aspect I missed). -- http://www.hindu.com/2010/03/22/stories/2010032263061300.htm 2016 time frame. Very interesting to note the longer range ABM shield for missiles >2K, wouldn't our strategy to hit the enemy missile in the mid-course in space? Both ABMs and our petal config should keep us safe for the future. |