Indian Missile News And Discussion - Printable Version +- Forums (http://india-forum.com) +-- Forum: Indian and International Forces (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: Military Discussion (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: Indian Missile News And Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=182) |
Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 11-27-2011 [url="http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/shaurya-surfaces-as-indias-underwater-nuclear-missile/23/20/385952/"]Shaurya surfaces as India's underwater nuclear missile[/url] Quote:Ajai Shukla / New Delhi February 17, 2010, 0:04 IST Indian Missile News And Discussion - ramana - 11-29-2011 Manorama's The Week article on Reign of Fire about AIV and AV follow-on. Arun, He gives ~thrust of F/S motor for AV. And gives some comments on the RLG and its MINGS package. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 12-05-2011 The A1-A2 booster is 1 m diameter and 10 meter long it thrust is 46 tonne (Sea Level) { 51 tonne Vacuum}. This number sets the limit on maximum range even if one stages the rocket in 2 or 3 stages. The A-IV booster that is 1.2 to 1.3m diameter and 10 m long, the reported thrust of 350 tonne seems a gross outlier and thus most likely an error. Even the Agni-3 with 2 meter diameter and 8.5 m long does not have this kind of thrust. Also in comparison the massive PSLV core stage is 2.8 m diameter and 20 m long and that generates thrust of about 500 tonne. IMHO the A-IV booster thrust will realistically be in the range of 75 - 100 tonne. If one can see the video launch frame by frame, and count the time it took to clear its own height(20 m) it will directly tell the acceleration at lift off, and multiply that by weight of the missile (officially reported as 17 tonne, but I think that is impossible, given its diameter and length IMHO the launch weight was >20 tonne) that will tell booster's initial thrust. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 12-05-2011 Took some time to do photo analysis of A-IV Assuming the missile was 20 m tall.
Based on above it is clear that booster weigh around 17 tonne, and all up weight of about 23 tonne (including 800 kg Payload). Indian Missile News And Discussion - Bharat_2009 - 12-12-2011 http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/article2707196.ece MmW Seeker successfully flight-tested in Nag Hope Indian Army wouldn't have an excuse now to ignore Nag !! It's about time for Nag - the most advanced of its kind in this neighborhood !! Indian Missile News And Discussion - Bharat_2009 - 12-14-2011 http://expressbuzz.com/thesundaystandard/n-tipped-dhanush-set-for-fresh-trial/342151.html N-tipped Dhanush set for fresh trial Looks like Dhanush is here to stay !! Dhanush for anti-ship role !! Always thought Dhanush would take that role eventually !! Indian Missile News And Discussion - Raj Malhotra - 12-18-2011 I was looking at the specifications of Midgetman missile of USA. Now using this 'old' missile as a benchmark, the range of Indian missiles may be way more than predicated. My guess:- Agni-1 1500km Agni-2 3500km Agni-3 8000km New Series:- Shaurya 3000km Agni-2 Prime = Agni-4 6000km Agni-V= MIRV 9000km Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 12-19-2011 RAJ: Range is a function of payload, what is the payload guesstimates for the suggested range? Indian Missile News And Discussion - Raj Malhotra - 12-21-2011 [quote name='Arun_S' date='19 December 2011 - 01:15 AM' timestamp='1324237043' post='114058'] RAJ: Range is a function of payload, what is the payload guesstimates for the suggested range? [/quote] 250kg or so Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 12-22-2011 [quote name='Raj Malhotra' date='21 December 2011 - 02:40 PM' timestamp='1324458163' post='114068'] 250kg or so [/quote] From[url="http://www.indiandefencereview.com/defence-industry/Way-to-a-Credible-Deterrent.html"] Way to a Credible Deterrent- IDR[/url] this is good graph to see the relative capability. Agni-4's range performance will obviously be between the graph for A-II and Agni-3SL. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Ravi - 01-11-2012 Hey Arun, i got this para from a DRDO article- "Defence Science Journal, Vol. 60, No. 2, March 2010, pp. 124-136,2010, DESIDOC" 6th para in the article states "ADRDE also designed and developed a float system for K-15 missile recovery system. The tests were carried out successfully by ADRDE and DRDL." Can you please tell me how does the float system work in recovering a missile...??? Why and how do they recover a missile when it has already destroyed itself by hitting the target. Indian Missile News And Discussion - ramana - 01-12-2012 Its for recovery after flight tests over sea waters. Dont want the parts to be scavanged. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Ravi - 01-12-2012 [quote name='ramana' date='12 January 2012 - 01:39 AM' timestamp='1326312077' post='114187'] Its for recovery after flight tests over sea waters. Dont want the parts to be scavanged. [/quote] Do you mean that the missile will be intact to recover even after hitting the target at Mach 7. According to your theory 1. How can they pack a floating system (air bag's) into a missile..??? 2. Even if they pack floating system into missile, how can they pack separate floating system for different parts which may be small and which would have been disintegrate after hitting the target ...??? What i guess is may be something like silo which will be immersed in water before the launch and it will be recovered by floating system once the missile is launched. Silo is immersed to replicate sub-surface launched. May be Arunji might clear this doubt. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 01-13-2012 All I will say on this question is that you are changing from a winning horse to a wrong horse. I have nothing to add. Mulling on Ramana's reply will lead you to missing link and correct understanding. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 01-24-2012 [url="http://www.samachar.com/Indias-latest-ncapable-missile-to-be-showcased-on-RDay-mbxsNEdchif.html?source=recommended_news"]India's latest n-capable missile to be showcased on R'Day[/url] Quote: [size="3"][color="333333"] New Delhi, Jan 23 : Agni-IV, India's latest nuclear-capable strategic missile, will be showcased to the public for the first time as part of the static display atop a tableau that its developer, the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), will be fielding during this year's Republic Day parade Thursday.[/color][/size] Indian Missile News And Discussion - Raj Malhotra - 01-24-2012 Quote:The Prahaar missile is "an another marvel of technology" recently developed by DRDO, Gupta said, noting that it is a tactical battlefield support missile based on solid fuel propulsion and is equipped with high precision inertial navigation system, giving it capability to hit targets around 150 km away with pin-point accuracy. Would 150km with 250kg warhead be reasonable range of Prahaar or is 150km is understated as usual style? Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 01-25-2012 Understated as usual. Actual for ballistic trajectory will be about 230Km for basic model. But given it has MINS and is basically a derivative of a aerodynamic missile for endosphric flight, this beast is capable of doing what Prithvi has done all long, Viz, glide on the way down and keep level flight at 40 Km altitude, and it will easily do 400 Km. Just Mk-II software change. A.k.a the original APJ Kalam project to convert a SAM into a theater ballistic missile; in this a case an uber form of SAM translated into a TBM. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Raj Malhotra - 01-28-2012 [quote name='Arun_S' date='25 January 2012 - 07:26 AM' timestamp='1327456125' post='114300'] Understated as usual. Actual for ballistic trajectory will be about 230Km for basic model. But given it has MINS and is basically a derivative of a aerodynamic missile for endosphric flight, this beast is capable of doing what Prithvi has done all long, Viz, glide on the way down and keep level flight at 40 Km altitude, and it will easily do 400 Km. Just Mk-II software change. A.k.a the original APJ Kalam project to convert a SAM into a theater ballistic missile; in this a case an uber form of SAM translated into a TBM. [/quote] If services ever get to order this missle then it might make something like Kargil or Siachin intrusion very difficult for Pakistan. It can be long range super bullet to take out any post? Using RLG INS, I assume that accuracy should be around 100m or so (excluding GPS etc), IIRC SAMs of Soviet era had secondary SS role. Even US standard missile - SAM has secondary anti ship role. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Arun_S - 01-30-2012 [quote name='Raj Malhotra' date='28 January 2012 - 10:13 AM' timestamp='1327725352' post='114322'] If services ever get to order this missle then it might make something like Kargil or Siachin intrusion very difficult for Pakistan. It can be long range super bullet to take out any post? Using RLG INS, I assume that accuracy should be around 100m or so (excluding GPS etc), IIRC SAMs of Soviet era had secondary SS role. Even US standard missile - SAM has secondary anti ship role. [/quote] MINS accuracy at such short range has got be much more accurate than 100 Mtr. But IR/Optical scene correlation is very relevant for this velocity regime, thus I expect the final accuracy to be about 1 meter for fixed target or even artillery spotter aimed target (UAV spotter based) will be same. Think of China border application also. Indian Missile News And Discussion - Raj Malhotra - 01-31-2012 [quote name='Arun_S' date='30 January 2012 - 08:11 AM' timestamp='1327890797' post='114336'] MINS accuracy at such short range has got be much more accurate than 100 Mtr. But IR/Optical scene correlation is very relevant for this velocity regime, thus I expect the final accuracy to be about 1 meter for fixed target or even artillery spotter aimed target (UAV spotter based) will be same. Think of China border application also. [/quote] Are you saying Prahaar has a seeker? I thought that it is only INS guided! |