![]() |
Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Printable Version +- Forums (http://india-forum.com) +-- Forum: Indian Politics, Business & Economy (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Forum: Strategic Security of India (http://india-forum.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=18) +--- Thread: Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 (/showthread.php?tid=157) |
Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 03-23-2010 . [center][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_rOvlv48BPY&feature=player_embedded[/media][/center] [center][size="6"][color="#006400"]YouTube - Pakistan IMF Loans and Pakistani Politics[/color][/size][/center] [center][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9aOWCLHcYd4&feature=player_embedded[/media][/center] [center][size="6"][color="#006400"]YouTube - IMF LOANS for Pakistan in FEB 2010[/color][/size][/center] Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Arun_S - 03-23-2010 [url="http://hunzatimes.wordpress.com/2009/07/28/pakistan-faces-population-time-bomb/"]Pakistan faces population time bomb[/url] Quote:By Afzal [url="http://www.businessinsider.com/10-countries-on-the-verge-of-a-demographic-crisis-2010-2#part-one-emerging-economies-with-out-of-control-population-growth-1"]10 Countries On The Verge Of A Crippling Demographic Crisis[/url] Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 03-25-2010 [url="http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=2306"]Pakistan to ask US for another IMF waiver[/url] ISLAMABAD : Pakistan is going to ask the United States for another waiver on the fiscal deficit, which was recently upwardly revised to 5.1 per cent from 4.9 per cent during the last Dubai talks with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Now Pakistan wants further relaxation in the fiscal deficit up to 5.3 to 5.4 per cent. ââ¬ÅWe want to use the US influence to seek the IMF relief in the budget deficit as Pakistan does not want to increase the six per cent on power tariff due from April 1 because it is feared that the inflation-stricken 170 million countrymen will take to the streets and go for a massive agitation across the country if the power tariff is increased as agreed with the IMF,ââ¬Â a senior official at the Finance Ministry told The News. Pakistan will hold parleys with top US officials concerned to this effect on the sidelines of the Pak-US Strategic Partnership Dialogue being held today (Wednesday) and seek intervention to influence the IMF for more relief in the budget deficit target, salvage the country from six per cent power tariff increase due from April 1 and also relief in the Value Added Tax (VAT) implementation from July 1. The newly-appointed adviser to Prime Minister on Finance, Dr Abdul Hafeez Shaikh, Finance Secretary Salman Siddiq and Special Finance Secretary Asif Bajwa and other officials concerned are right now in Washington for the talks. Pakistan is going to place these demands before the top US functionaries when only seven days are left in the meeting of the IMF Executive Board that will take place on March 31 in Washington. It is pertinent to mention that the March 31 meeting would consider recommendations of the IMF staff mission carved out during the last Dubai talks that Pakistan should be given relief in the fiscal deficit up to 5.1 per cent from 4.9 per cent. The IMF staff mission had agreed with Pakistanââ¬â¢s assertion seeking relief in the fiscal deficit from 4.9 to 5.1 per cent. Originally, Pakistan wanted to increase the relief in the budget deficit up to 5.4 per cent. Now, we have strong reasons for seeking more relief in the fiscal deficit up to 5.3 to 5.4 per cent as if the IMF agrees not to increase the power tariff, the FBR will lose more revenue. The FBR was being anticipated to collect revenue somewhere between Rs 1,340 and Rs 1,350 billion in the current fiscal. However, the FBRââ¬â¢s tax revenue target stands at Rs 1,380 billion, which seems right now the mission impossible. And now if six per cent tariff is not increased from April 1, its capacity to collect the said revenue would further lower and on the other side Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, during his last visit to the Planning Commission, fixed the federal share in the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) at Rs 300 billion against Rs 250 billion agreed with the IMF. Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 03-25-2010 Pakis are so good milking world and look at our jokers. Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 03-27-2010 [quote name='Mudy' date='25 March 2010 - 06:47 PM' timestamp='1269522587' post='105449'] Pakis are so good milking world and look at our jokers. [/quote] Mudy Ji : Quote:[url="http://www.geo.tv/3-26-2010/61795.htm"]PSM suffers Rs. 180 billion loses[/url] Note : AFAIK all Indian "Major" Steel Plants are making favourable profits with TATA Indian Operations-Plants being possibly the World's Most Economic Producer. PSM has about 10,000 Employees. They could well sell or even demolish the Steel Plant and Deposit 240 Billion (Projected Annual Loss) and at 5% Interest would make Rs 12 Billion. This would mean about Rs. 1,200,000 per Employee. The Principal Amount remain "Intact". In addition the Pakistani Goverment would make Billions and Billions of Pakistani Rupees by selling the Land - it is 18,600 Acres (29 Square Miles)! I would rather prefer "Our Jokers" against the Pakistani Jokers who go running arround for More and More Loans-Grants whatever and then Beg for Debt Forgiveness!! I refer you to my Post of 23 March 2010 - 08:24 PM - First Video!!! Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 03-28-2010 [size="7"][color="#006400"][center]US justifies drone strikes in Pakistan[/center][/color][/size] WASHINGTON : The US government for the first time has offered a legal justification of its drone strikes against al-Qaeda and the Taliban militants, [color="#FF0000"]citing the right to ââ¬Åself-defenceââ¬Â under the international law.[/color] The CIA attacks by unmanned aircraft in Pakistan, Somalia and elsewhere have sharply increased under President Barack Obamaââ¬â¢s administration but have remained shrouded in secrecy, with some human rights groups charging the bombing raids amount to illegal assassinations. Broaching a subject that has been off-limits for official comment, State Department legal adviser Harold Koh laid out the legal argument for the strikes in a speech late on Thursday, referring to ââ¬Åtargetingââ¬Â of al-Qaeda and the Taliban figures without mentioning Pakistan or where the raids were carried out. [color="#FF0000"]The United States was in ââ¬Åan armed conflictââ¬Â with al-Qaeda, the Taliban and its affiliates[/color] as a result of the September 11 attacks, Koh said, ââ¬Åand may use force consistent with its inherent right to self-defence under the international law.ââ¬Â ââ¬ÅWith respect to the subject of targeting, which has been much commented upon in the media and international legal circles, there are obviously limits to what I can say publicly,ââ¬Â he told a conference of the American Society of International Law. ââ¬ÅWhat I can say is that it is the considered view of this administration ââ¬â and it has certainly been my experience during my time as legal adviser ââ¬â that the US targeting practices, including lethal operations conducted with the use of unmanned aerial vehicles, comply with all applicable law, including the laws of war.ââ¬Â The CIA would not comment on the speech, posted on the State Department website, but told media: ââ¬ÅThe Agencyââ¬â¢s counter-terrorism operations are conducted in strict accord with the law.ââ¬Â Rights activists and some legal experts charge the drone strikes in Pakistan and other countries, outside of a traditional battlefield, amount to extrajudicial executions that violate both international and the US law. Koh, a fierce critic of former president George W Bushââ¬â¢s policies before he took his post, disagreed ââ¬â saying a US ban on government sanctioned assassinations did not apply. Under the US law, [color="#FF0000"]ââ¬Åthe use of lawful weapons systems ââ¬â consistent with the applicable laws of war ââ¬â for precision targeting of specific high-level belligerent leaders when acting in self-defence or during an armed conflict is not unlawful, and hence does not constitute assassination,ââ¬Â[/color] he said. Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 03-29-2010 Quote:citing the right to ââ¬Åself-defenceââ¬Â under the international law. This should be valid with India also. India's first target should be terrorist hub- Islam-a-bad HQ. Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 03-29-2010 [url="http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2010/03/28/story_28-3-2010_pg7_4"] Pakistan negotiating for 14 more F-16s with USââ¬â¢[/url] Quote:* PAF chief says 18 F-16s with BVR missile systems to join PAF from June they should first feed themselves, then look for toys. Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 03-31-2010 [url="http://www.geo.tv/3-30-2010/62035.htm"][color="#FF0000"]Lahore plunges into darkness after massive breakdown[/color][/url] LAHORE: Almost half of Lahore has plunged into darkness [color="#FF0000"]following a massive power breakdown in the city[/color], Geo reported Tuesday. According to reports, some 30 grid stations of Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO) suddenly went out of operation. Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-01-2010 [url="http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=231849"]The Indus Waters Treaty conundrum[/url] The recent statements of Pakistanââ¬â¢s Indus Water Commissioner Jamat Ali Shah about the future of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) 1960 have landed Pakistani water experts in a conundrum. ââ¬ÅI think the World Bank treaty is likely to be jeopardised,ââ¬Â Shah, who led the Pak delegation in meetings with his Indian counterparts in Lahore, told the press earlier. ââ¬ÅWe will now have to look beyond the Treaty for solutions. India is allowed run-off hydro-electric projects according to the treaty, but two or three is different from more than a hundred.ââ¬Â Most experts warn against abandoning the IWT, that turns 50-year-old on Thursday, despite the intricate and difficult problems it poses. ââ¬ÅThe IWT is a wonderful instrument. [color="#FF0000"]However, our present managers simply donââ¬â¢t have the capacity for the state-of-the-art knowledge required to safeguard our rights,ââ¬Â[/color] says Arshad H Abbassi, Research Fellow with the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) in Islamabad. [color="#FF0000"]ââ¬ÅWe should never go for re-negotiations on the IWT or we will be done for.ââ¬Â[/color] There is ââ¬Åno exit clause in the treatyââ¬Â as Dr. Shahid Ahmad, member Natural Resources with the Pakistan Agricultural Research Council (PARC) and an eminent water resources management expert, notes. However, there is provision for an Addendum to the existing Treaty ââ¬â ââ¬ÅIWT-IIââ¬Â as some term it. Dr Ahmad advocates holding further talks to ââ¬Åaddress issues the existing instrument does not cover adequately.ââ¬Â These include guarantees for minimum flow from hydro-electric projects in the Indian territories, timely provision of discharge data and other Indian obligations under the Treaty. The IWT is silent on water quality and other environmental issues like watershed management and on the unconfined aquifers in the Indus Basin. It provides no remedy for the over-exploitation of these shared aquifers in Indian Punjab. Water tables are falling by a whopping three feet annually, says Dr Ahmad, citing a recent NASA study. ââ¬ÅThis affects us, being downstream. Both India and Pakistan must find a way to agree upon safe yields for this resource as we also depend heavily on groundwater for our agriculture. Let no one forget that India may put up power projects but the water rights still belong to Pakistan.ââ¬Â The IWT-II idea is not new, notes development expert Syed Ayub Qutub. ââ¬ÅMany Indian experts have been calling for this for at least two decades. India took waters from the eastern rivers to the desert in Rajasthan via the Indira Gandhi Canal. ââ¬ÅThey now have severe water-logging and salinity problems. So they would like to discharge their effluent in the rivers Sutlej and Ravi to send to Pakistan.ââ¬Â The IWT does not allow this. The Indian protaganists for IWT-II also have support from those in Kashmir who want greater irrigation rights from western rivers, he says. Syed Qutub does not rule out further negotiations since the ââ¬ÅIWT is not time-boundââ¬Â. Pakistan, he notes, gave up all its rights under the international instruments governing sharing of international waters, besides denying environmental flows in the eastern rivers. Although, Pakistan could do better in fresh negotiations, he warns that in the composition of the teams ââ¬Åthe balance of knowledge will decideââ¬Â. Former chairman Water and Power Development Authority and a celebrated water resources expert Shamsul Mulk [color="#FF0000"]strongly opposes abandoning the IWT despite its unpopularity.[/color] ââ¬ÅWe have lost three rivers but there are certain positive and negative things, and certain things that need to be improved as far as possible. Our position is to address the implementation of shortcomings and improve dispute resolution.ââ¬Â ââ¬ÅThe treaty has to be interpreted sincerely,ââ¬Â he adds. ââ¬ÅThe important thing about water treaties is the conduct of the upper riparian, which determines the success and failure of a treaty. ââ¬ÅI hope in the coming years when both Pakistan and India are faced with greater pressures, Indiaââ¬â¢s conduct will not negate the spirit of understanding reached in September 1960.ââ¬Â Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-01-2010 [url="http://thenews.jang.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=28091"]Pak-India talks on hydro projects fail[/url] LAHORE: After the failure of the Permanent Indus Waters Commissions of India and Pakistan to bridge differences over two projects on the Chenab and Jhelum rivers, the commissions also failed to make progress on controversial hydropower projects being built by India on the Indus River. The latest breakdown of talks could lead to intervention of a third party. The World Bank-assisted mechanism of neutral expert or court of arbitration is among various options that have already been sought by Pakistan to remove the differences on Baglihar and Kishanganga projects. During the three-day negotiations that ended here on Tuesday, India was not willing to accept Pakistanââ¬â¢s assertion about illegal designs of Nimmo Bazgo and Chutak hydropower projects and also insisted to postpone further dialogue on this important issue till next the meeting of the commission. A Pakistani team member expressed concern that India was intensifying its efforts to construct a series of water sector projects on western rivers that had been given to Pakistan under the 1961 Indus Waters Treaty. ââ¬ÅAfter constructing illegal structures on Chenab and Jhelum, India is now focusing on Indus river and has turned a deaf ear to Pakistanââ¬â¢s objections during the talks,ââ¬Â he added. He said the visiting Indian team was exposed when Indian Commissioner for Indus Waters expressed inability to take stand on various issues related to Nimmo-Bazgo and Chutak hydropower projects. ââ¬ÅWe can respond to objection of Pakistan only after seeking advice from the government,ââ¬Â said the Indian commissioner in response to Pakistanââ¬â¢s several objections to hydropower projects. The official said a permanent commission set up under the Indus Waters Treaty was a full fledged body and it should be capable of taking decisions on controversial issues. ââ¬ÅThe impression given by the Indian team in negotiation only points to dillydallying,ââ¬Â he added. Meanwhile, Pakistan Commissioner for Indus Waters Jamaat Ali Shah said India was neither accepting Pakistanââ¬â¢s objection to water sector projects, nor it was willing to refer this issue to a third party. However, he made it clear that the decision to proceed further was taken on the level of the commission and India wanted to discuss this issue further in the upcoming meeting in the last week of May in New Dehli. ââ¬ÅThe efforts of commission have been exhausted and it will be put forward in the shape of questions, which need concrete answers,ââ¬Â he elaborated. He sought assurances from India that it must incorporate changes suggested by Pakistan in the project design, in the light of the Indus Waters Treaty, if these were considered logical in the next round of talks. However, he lamented that Indian delegation did not respond to this, saying they would respond later. Meanwhile, after the conclusion of three-day talks, Indian Indus Waters Commissioner Aranga Nathan once again insisted that India was not stealing Pakistanââ¬â¢s share of river waters and all hydropower projects being built by the country were according to the provisions of the treaty. [color="#FF0000"]He termed it merely a propaganda of the media in Pakistan that India was stealing water of the western rivers.[/color] Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-03-2010 . [url="http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=102068"][center][size="7"][color="#006400"]PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT TO IMPORT MORE VIAGRA : PM GILANI[/color][/size][/center][/url] Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-04-2010 . [url="http://www.geo.tv/4-4-2010/62324.htm"]Pak fiscal deficit likely to cross 6pc mark[/url] Quote:ISLAMABAD : The Finance Ministry said [color="#FF0000"]Pakistanââ¬â¢s fiscal deficit could outgo six percent[/color] if the country is not paid the expenditures sustained in the war on terror by the US on time. Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-05-2010 . ![]() ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 04-06-2010 [url="http://www.hindustantimes.com/46-die-in-Pak-attacks-US-mission-target/H1-Article1-527297.aspx"]Terror unlimited: 46 die in Pak attacks, US mission target[/url] Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 04-07-2010 what a surprise !!! Quote:New Delhi-Lahore bus brings fake currency start more buses and trains and give more visa to Pakis, it will speed up destruction of Indian economy. Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Naresh - 04-08-2010 . [url="http://www.geo.tv/4-8-2010/62567.htm"]Sinking PSM needs Rs15b in bailout package[/url] KARACHI: The Senateââ¬â¢s Standing Committee on Industrial Production was told that Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) badly needs Rs15 billion as bailout package, as it currently stands at 25 percent of its capacity, Geo News reported Thursday. Cheers ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - acharya - 04-10-2010 ![]() Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 04-13-2010 [url="http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/provinces/03-two-protestors-killed-70-injured-in-abbotabad-ss-06"]Six killed during protests in Abbotabad[/url] Quote:ABBOTTABAD: Six people were killed and more than 200 people injured on Monday when furious mobs, protesting plans to rename Pakistan's North West Frontier Province, clashed with police, officials said. PAKISTAN: Senators condemn killing innocent lives in Hazara Pakistan : Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 6 - Guest - 04-13-2010 [url="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100413/ap_on_re_as/as_pakistan"]Pakistan airstrike kills 71 civilians: official[/url] Quote:PESHAWAR, Pakistan ââ¬â Up to 71 civilians were killed in a weekend strike by Pakistani jets near the Afghan border, survivors and a government official said Tuesday ââ¬â a rare confirmation of civilian casualties that risks undercutting public support for the fight against militants. Ethnic cleansing in full swing in front of whole world. This is holocaust. |