Twirp: Terrorist Wahabi Islamic Rep Pakistan 4

08-16-2009, 10:10 PM

QUOTE(Naresh @ Aug 16 2009, 03:36 PM)Mudy Ji :

Contrary to your âConvictionsâ Bambi "CANNOT DO What Bambi Wants to Doâ.

The President-Presidency of the United States of America is controlled by the âKing Makersâ or in this case we can say the âPresident Makersâ.

As such Bambi will do what the âPresident Makersâ want him to do.

And the âPresident Makersâ will want Bambi to do what they consider to be in the best interest of the United States of America.

Here Endeth the Lesson!
[right][snapback]100417[/snapback][/right]

They are far-left loons now. Soros is big player. They want to do Magadishu sprint back home as they did during Clinton. As Clinton did, closed eyes towards Islamist and created Taliban. Current admin is Xerox of Clinton admin or they are old Clinton admin player. They had not changed.

Naresh · (This post was last modified: 08-17-2009, 01:14 PM by Naresh.)

Seven killed in Charsadda bomb explosion

Updated at: 1212 PST, Monday, August 17, 2009

CHARSADDA: Seven persons were killed and more than 12 wounded in a bomb blast at a petrol pump in Shab Qadar area of Charsadda.

According to reports, a bomb was planted in a car that exploded during filling of diesel at a petrol pump. Most of the injured reported in a critical condition. Security forces have cordoned off the area and started collecting the

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-17-2009, 04:59 PM

Taliban claimed responsibility of Charsadda blast

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-18-2009, 12:01 AM

YouTube â Highlights of âFour Hundred Per Cent Better than Indiaâ Pakistani Education

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · (This post was last modified: 08-18-2009, 03:58 AM by Naresh.)

US lures Pakistan away from gasline

ISLAMABAD â Asking to stay away from Iranian gas pipeline for enhanced American energy cooperation, the Washington left Islamabad in a fix on Monday to choose between nearest available gas line or help line from US in tackling the ever-growing energy crisis.

âIn case Pakistan withdraws from the primary partnership of transnational Iran-Pakistan-India (IPI) Gas Pipeline project, it would also get the American support to get funds committed by the Friends of Democratic Pakistan (FoDP),â sources told TheNation here on Monday.

According to the sources, President Obamaâs Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke and Finance Minister Shaukat Tarin tossed these options during their meeting here on Monday. US High Commissioner Anne W Patterson flanked the special envoy while State Minister for Finance Hina Rabbani Khar was there to reinforce the Pakistani side.

Meanwhile, an official handout stated that the federal minister briefed Holbrooke about the state of Pakistani economy, particularly the issues related to energy crisis.

Holbrooke, while appreciating the signs of improvement of Pakistanâs economy assured US governmentâs full cooperation in resolving Pakistanâs economic issues, including the energy crisis.

Earlier, the sources said that the gas pipeline was not only sufficient to fuel power generation to tune of 4000MW in addition to the potential of earning sizeable transit fee in case India and China tended to join the transnational so-called peace pipeline. Of late the Pakistani intelligence agencies have also reportedly opposed the gas pipeline project from Iran that they believe entails security hazards. The government consequently has decided to get the parliamentary node to the project, but so far it has been dilly-dallying on bringing the IPI to the Parliament. At the same time, the Americans more than once had declared unequivocally their opposition to the project initiating from Iran, the sources said.

On the other hand, the sources said the American energy cooperation meant mere financial support to either import liquefied natural gas on short-term basis and fetch a high voltage transmission line from Tajikistan as a long-term solution. Not only the construction of power transmission line would require reasonable time frame but also security assurance especially when it passed through the Afghan territories, the sources added.

âThere was also a possibility of American financial as well as technical support in the Thar Coal Development project,â the sources mentioned.

Reuters/APP/Online add : Pakistan has told the United States it hopes to ease power shortages by renting electricity-generating plants over the next three to five years but wants Washingtonâs backing in a longer-term upgrade and diversification of the countryâs antiquated power sector.

US envoy Holbrooke said the United States was considering funding projects to upgrade Pakistanâs antiquated power sector, but played down the speed at which assistance would materialise and crippling electricity shortages would end.

He said the US would provide $1 billion aid to Pakistan and also pledged more aid to the country. He said the meeting of Friends of Democratic Pakistan (FoDP) would improve Pakistanâs trade with the world.

âThis problemâs been building for 25 years. We need time to work out what makes sense,â he said, adding that US commitments âdonât mean electricity in Karachi next weekâ.

The meeting discussed issues related to Malakand Pilot Project, energy crisis and meeting of Friends of Democratic Pakistan (FoDP) to be held in Istanbul on August 25.

Tarin said the government would rent electricity-generating plants over the next three to five years to fill the gap until large-scale energy projects come online.

Tarin asked the US to help Pakistan in solving its energy crisis on permanent basis and to release Coalition Support Fund soon.

Holbrooke, while appreciating the signs of improvement of Pakistanâs economy, assured of US governmentâs full cooperation in resolving Pakistanâs economic issues including the energy crisis.

Minister of State for Finance and Economic Affairs Hina Rabbani Khar and US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W Patterson were also present during the meeting.

Finance Minister Tarin said after talks with Holbrooke that Washington could assist Islamabad by providing financial guarantees to encourage investment in large-scale energy projects that would replace the temporary, rental plants.

âWeâre looking at the energy sector in an effort to be responsive to a critical issue facing the Pakistani people,â said Mary Beth Goodman, Holbrookeâs economic adviser.

âThe energy shortfalls are not only impacting the border areas but the entire country, without regard to demographic or geographic boundaries.â

To ease power shortages in the short term, Tarin said the International Monetary Fund (IMF) had approved subsidy on electricity on the directives of the US. He said Pakistan was trying to overcome short-term electricity problems through rental power plants as it is facing shortage of 3,500 MW.

He said rental power plants would be used to generate up to 3,500 megawatts of electricity. He said the rentals would be used for the next three to five years.

Speaking to a small group of reporters travelling with Holbrooke, Tarin said Pakistan would not need US cash assistance to run the temporary plants.

âWe can do it ourselves,â he said, adding that he expected the local banking sector to step forward with financing.

But Tarin said the rental plants would be replaced in three to five years, and that Pakistan was looking for Washingtonâs help in encouraging private investment in hydro-electric, coal, wind and solar projects.

âThat is the mix we want and, frankly, thatâs a long term kind of solution,â he said. âAnd if the US can help us and showcase our case in the United States, Iâm sure that weâll get investments.â

Tarin described Pakistanâs current reliance on gas-fired plants as âtotally screwed upâ.

âWe donât have either gas or petrol. We have to import them,â he said.

Tarin said the current crisis was the result of a lack of planning. âWe sat on it for 10 years. If we had not sat on it for 10 years, when our economy was growing at 7 per cent, we wouldnât have any of this mess. But thatâs history.â

The Finance Minister asked Washington to allow free access to US markets.

He said the FoDP would only discuss reconstruction of Malakand Division.

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-18-2009, 04:13 AM

.

<img src='http://www.nation.com.pk/uploads/news_image/original/Maxim_Cartoon_6530.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

08-18-2009, 07:47 AM

foolish pakistani student, mullah katl ud din, breaks electrical door displaying extreme stupidity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w60Sxop5I38
<!--emo& Confused

tupid--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/pakee.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='pakee.gif' />

ramana · 08-19-2009, 12:45 AM

Nightwatch 16 August 2009 update.....

QUOTEPakistan: President Zardari on 14 August lifted a ban on political activity in the Pashtun tribal belt on the Afghan border, Reuters reported. Zardari said Pashtun tribesmen should not have a different identity, and because they are Pakistani citizens, all laws and rights should be apply to the people who live in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA).

The story behind the story is that the government is slowly using its political powers to break the political autonomy of the tribal agencies.Â The Constitution guarantees the agencies a large measure of political and administrative autonomy, under the Presidency, not the parliament.Â

In opening the agencies to Pakistanâs political parties, the Presidency is undermining the isolation and provincialism of the tribes that the current Constitutional arrangement promotes.Â Pakistan just took an important step in the direction of breaking the hold of the elders, imams and the district agents.

Security.Â At least 17 members of the Maulvi Nazir faction of the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP aka the Pakistani Taliban), including Maulvi Nazir himself, have been killed in fighting with the Baitullah Mehsud group, rival leader Turkistan Bhittani told a private TV channel on Sunday.

The significance of this is that Maulvi Nazir and his fighters were pro-government militants for more than a year.Â The Maulvi sought to steer the movement to support fighting in Afghanistan to force US forces to leave.Â Baitullah Mehsud focused the movement against the Pakistan government as an agent of the US. The two factions regularly skirmish.

Pakistan-Turkey-Iran:Â For the record. The BBC reported on Friday that Pakistan has begun its first international freight train service from Islamabad to Istanbul.Â The 6,500km (4,040 mile) trial service via Tehran is a pilot project of the regional Economic Co-operation Organization.

The train will pull 20 cars on its maiden journey from Islamabad railway station, delivering 14 to Tehran and six to Istanbul a fortnight after it sets off. The first journey will also take railway experts from the three countries on board to gauge performance and check for obstacles over the vast route.

Officials expect it to boost Pakistan's trade with Turkey and Iran - currently estimated at $1bn - by as much as 50%. There are also hopes the route will eventually provide a link to Europe and Central Asia, and carry passengers.

Naresh · 08-19-2009, 03:15 AM

A conspiracy to barren Pakistan's farmlands

While Pakistan has handed over credible evidence of Indian involvement in the subversive activities on its soil, India has pierced yet another soft target by building Wullar barrage on Jhelum River forcing the agro-based economy in tatters. Pakistan Indus Commissioner Syed Jamaat Ali Shah and Indian Indus water Commissioner G Aranganathan held important parleys early June and discussed 14 agenda items; including the contentious Wullar barrage project. The talks were essentially a failure with both sides being unable to reach an agreement on the Chenab's water flow, the Wullar barrage project and Nimo Bazgo hydel power projects. The two nations refer to the dam project by different names - Pakistan calls it the Wullar barrage and India calls it the Tulbul Navigation Project. It is a barrage because India is storing the flow of water through a 22-KM long tunnel into the Wullar Lake. According to Indian water strategists, the dam will help maintain better water levels in a nearby lake and regulate the flow of flood waters. That is why, it is a navigational effort. Nevertheless, Islamabad fears the proposed dam on the Jhelum river, a tributary of the Indus, will affect water levels further downstream in the plains of its Punjab province threatening irrigation and power projects. In the wake of inconclusive talks on water flow of Jhelum, Indian attempt to use water as a geo-strategic tool, is unfair and in contravention to the IWT-1960.

According to Indus Water Treaty of 1960, India has been allotted exclusive control/right over the waters of the eastern rivers, namely; the Ravi, the Beas and the Sutlej. Pakistan controls the waters of three western rivers; the Indus, the Jhelum and the Chenab. It is interesting to note that the base-source of water of all the rivers flows from Indian Held Kashmir (IHK). As the demand for water increased manifold, India's growing lust for maximum control over the sources of the supply of water of three western rivers, *became more pronounced for its burgeoning population*. The treaty barred India from storing any water or constructing any storage works on the western rivers that would result in a reduced flow of water to Pakistan. The Indian design to construct dams on Pakistani rivers will diminished the flow of Jhelum during the vital Rabi crop-sowing season (January and February) threatening Pakistan's agro-based economy and throwing the fate of dismal farmers in the abyss of absurdity.

The problem between the two countries arose when India decided to build a dam on the Kishan-Ganga River that originates in Indian Occupied Kashmir. The Kishan-Ganga river assumes the name of Neelum river upon entering in the Azad Kashmir region and becomes river Jhelum when it enters Pakistan. Pakistan has been vehemently opposing the construction of the Kishan-Ganga hydropower project. Pakistan believes that the diversion of waters of Neelum is not allowed under the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, and it will face a 27 per cent water deficit, when the project gets completed. The reduced water flow in the Neelum would not yield the required results of the proposed 1.6 billion dollars Neelum-Jehlum hydropower project that has been designed to generate 969 MW of electricity. India proposed to build the barrage in 1984 on the River Jhelum, at the mouth of Wullar Lake, India's largest fresh water lake, near Sopore town in Kashmir Valley. The proposed site for dam is near Kanzalwan - a town from where the river enters Azad Kashmir. The Indian plans include storing water and then tunneling it to the Wuller lake, where it is constructing a 800MW power house. India has almost completed a 22-kilometre long tunnel to divert Kishanganga waters to Wullar Lake in Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan maintains that India, under the treaty, can store water but it cannot divert it to any other side. Thus, any diversion would violate the provisions of the treaty. Pakistan believes Wullar barrage can be used as: (1) a geo-strategic weapon, (2) potential to disrupt the triple canal project of Pakistan, (3) badly affecting the Neelum-Jehlum hydro-power project, (4) agriculture in Azad Kashmir (5) drying the lands of Punjab province.

The Indian side is of the view that Pakistan is not developing its hydel resources anyway and should not get so serious about its objections. Although India has shuddered away the water issue as Pakistan's tactics of diverting world's attention from terrorism, yet one appreciates that the critical economic and environmental concerns are intricately linked with the terrorism. Amongst the root causes of terrorism, the abject poverty plays a crucial role in breeding extremism. The closure of Jhelum river is grand Indian design to make Pakistan barren by 2014. It would dry some 5.6 million acres of land precipitating economic slowdown as well as augmenting deep rooted feelings of depression in the life's of poor toilers associated with agrarian concern - deserting the frustrated and marginalized youth in the lurch with no other choice than to opt for extremism and terrorism. Is this not the abetment of terrorism?

During the recently concluded annual talks at the Permanent Commission of Indus Water, both sides could not resolve the objections like: free board of the dam, quantum of storage, silt outlet and diversion of water as the Indian side maintained its previous position. According to the original Indian plan, the barrage was expected to be of 439-feet long and 40-feet wide, and would have a maximum storage capacity of 0.30 million acres feet of water. As the talks between Pakistan and India on the controversial Wullar barrage Project have broken down, Pakistan is planning to approach World Bank to appoint an arbitrator if the commission fails to decide on objections raised by it. According to IWT-1960, India could construct only those dams that were included in the Indus Water Treaty. Pakistan was taking the step because India has not shown any willingness to sort out the issue.

The large dams and water reservoirs disrupt the ecological balance of rivers by depleting them of oxygen and nutrients, and affecting the migration and reproduction of fish and other freshwater species. A WWF report warns that indiscriminate dam-building is threatening the rivers as over 60% of the world's 227 largest rivers have been fragmented by dams. The governments are not applying the recommendations of WWF to their dam projects. As a result, the benefits that dams provide - such as hydropower, irrigation, and flood control services - are often overtaken by negative environmental and social impacts. There are over 48,000 large dams in operation worldwide, with India having 4,635 dams while Pakistan is lingering around the figure of just 72 dams. India should avoid building water dams cum hydroelectric projects where water is availed as a "collective resource". Any major upstream alteration in a river system should be negotiated, not imposed as in case of Wullar barrage on its lower riparian users. The Governments of India and Pakistan should look beyond national borders to basin-wide cooperation. While Pakistan & India agreed that terrorism is the main threat to both countries and affirmed their resolve to work together to fight terrorism and not to link it with the peace talks disrupted by the Mumbai attacks in late November, it is imperative that India should address water disputes between the two countries where water is used as a collective resource. India should consider those root causes in its campaign against terrorism. This will help in reducing the threat of Terrorism. It is hoped that both sides would revert back to the dialogue process in the larger interest of peace and stability in the region.

* : Typical Pakistani Madrassah Maths!

In 1947 - at the time of Partition Indiaâs Population was about 330 Million whereas Pakistanâs Population was about 30 Million.

Now Indiaâs population is about 1,154 Million whereas Pakistanâs Population has risen to about 180 Million. However, some Pakistani Columnists are stating a Figure of about 200 Million.

Thus it is the Pakistanis Breeding like Rabbits, Rats and Rabies causing a comparative lesser availibility of Water in Pakistan.

Pakistanis must learn that Pakistanis Make More Babies but God Cannot Make Any More Water

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-19-2009, 03:41 AM

QUOTE(ramana @ Aug 19 2009, 12:45 AM)Nightwatch 16 August 2009 update.....

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTEPakistan-Turkey-Iran:Â For the record. The BBC reported on Friday that Pakistan has begun its first international freight train service from Islamabad to Istanbul.Â Â The 6,500km (4,040 mile) trial service via Tehran is a pilot project of the regional Economic Co-operation Organization.

The train will pull 20 cars on its maiden journey from Islamabad railway station, delivering 14 to Tehran and six to Istanbul a fortnight after it sets off. The first journey will also take railway experts from the three countries on board to gauge performance and check for obstacles over the vast route.

Officials expect it to boost Pakistan's trade with Turkey and Iran - currently estimated at $1bn - by as much as 50%. There are also hopes the route will eventually provide a link to Europe and Central Asia, and carry passengers.


[right][snapback]100469[/snapback][/right]
</div>

ramana Ji :

Please refer the to following :

Pakistan-Turkey rail trial starts

QUOTEThe train will pull 20 containers on its maiden journey from Islamabad railway station, delivering 14 to Tehran and six to Istanbul a fortnight after it sets off.

As per photographs in the Pakistani Media each âFlat Carâ is carrying Two 20 Tonne Container and as such it is only a 10 Container Wagons and possibly the other 10 Cars are carrying âFree Loadersâ

The Quetta â Taftan Route, of ancient vintage, supports a Weekly Train of about Two to Four Passenger Bogies and 6-10 âSmallerâ Goods Wagons.

Whilst not doubting the eventual success of this Route I feel that it will âTake Awayâ all of Gwadarâs Container Cargoes from Pakistan to the Middle East and possibly Europe.

One must âwatch the situationâ closely

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

08-19-2009, 03:51 AM

Well, I am happy they will send drugs/heroin to Istanbul, Iran and will spare Punjab, which is under grip of Drugs from Samjhuta.

Bodhi · 08-19-2009, 07:32 AM

QUOTEwhat a silly proposition: "Partition must go!" That means you will have to permanently suppress a near-majority of Muslims, who moreover have alliances with all the non-Hindus and with many who count as Hindus only for census purposes. Of course they intend to gobble up their neo-Ambedkarite, Dravidianist, Christian and Khalistani allies later on, but first they will use them to flatten what remains of Hinduism. Prospering as Hindus in a reunited India? You just can't do it.

And then this belated indignation about the Two-Nation theory. That at least was one thing about which Jinnah was entirely right: apart from radically different beliefs and rituals, Hindus and Muslims don't intermarry, and they have different cuisine, script, music, dress, register of names, sexual mores. By all the usual criteria, they do constitute different nations. Yes, they have a largely common ancestry (though Muslims have considerable foreign admixture and also falsely pretend to foreignness with names like Sayyid or Sharif, both implying descent from the prophet, Quraishi etc.), so in that respects they are the split halves of what used to be one nation, and possibly that nation can be reunited,-- after its split has been acknowledged as a reality. You can of course reintegrate these two nations into one, viz. by reuniting them in all the respects mentioned above. The Muslims are entirely willing to do that, viz. by welcoming all Hindus into the Islamic fold,-- then you can have your Akhand Bharat right away. The only other way to do it, is to welcome all Muslims into the Hindu fold.

Talking about undoing Partition without spending the remaining 99% of your talk on the practical problem of bringing the Muslims out of Islam is a sign of braindeadness.

It's the same lack of brainmife in Europe and in India. The only way to stop the rising tide of Islam, which will engulf both remainder-India and Europe within this century, is to seduce Muslims out of Islam. Forcing them out of it may be more to your liking, but I don't know how to force people to change their minds (as distinct from their publicly stated positions) about anything. And I respect fellow men including Muslims too much to even wish for any conversion by force.

Years ago there was someone on this list, living in New Jersey, who concluded all his mails with "Have five kids or become Muslim", "have five kids or end up in a Muslim harem", "have five kids or see your only daughter raped by Muslims", etc. He thought the only way to counter Islam was to wage and win the demographic war. I don't think this will catch on with Sandhya and other advocates of women's self-determination and birth control. Nor is it, arguably, responsible in a world on the verge of overpopulation. Limited demographic measures such as keeping out Muslim immigrants (who infiltrate both India and Europe) can be defended, but an all-out demographic competition is undesirable, as well as being a pipe-dream.

Unlike in India (to my knowledge), the proverbially non-converting and extinction-bound Zoroastrians are recruiting converts in Tajikistan, Ossetia, and the large Iranian community in Los Angeles,-- but only among Iranians. They are an ethnic religion, but do recruit converts, viz. in their own ethnic group, assuming al Iranian Muslims are in effect estranged Zoroastrians. So even if you conceive of Hinduism as a blood-and-soil religion, you too have a large field of conversion candidates: not the Westerners so beloved of airport Gurus, but the South-Asian Muslims.

The Islam problem in South Asia has legal, military and other aspects, but the overriding concern if you really hope to ever reunite historical India and live in peace, is the Muslims' belief in the silly but dangerous claims of Mohammed. Anyone who doesn't focus on the practical question of how to liberate Muslims from the mental prison-house of Islam, isn't serious about solving this problem, nor about undoing Partition.

Kind regards,

KE

08-19-2009, 10:11 AM

Editorial: Sectarian violence from Sindh to Gilgit

Naresh · 08-20-2009, 04:10 AM

No quick fix for energy crisis : US

KARACHI - The United States is planning to open four visa consular sections in Pakistan within a year while is restarting the consulate service in Karachi, which will provide 100 business visas per week from next month aiming to promote business opportunities and potential of Pakistanâs economy in the current world of economic globalisation and trade liberalisation

Richard Holbrooke, US Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan, stated this while speaking at a news conference held on Wednesday at local hotel. He said US was committed to work with Pakistan, and knew well that Pakistan could compete at the global set up, fairly well.

Replying to a question if the upcoming elections in Afghanistan would be fair and transparent, he replied, âI am not sure, whether the elections will be transparent in Afghanistan or not; we will see it when the elections are held. Afghanistan is a different country and it is difficult to hold elections in a war zone. No elections are perfect, but it is hoped that there will be observers and around 800 journalists who will get to cover the election process in Afghanistan.â

He said he felt at home in Pakistan, particularly in Karachi, which he found to be very hospitable, adding being a native New Yorker himself, he had found great similarities between the two cities of Karachi and New York.

Holbrooke said he was well aware of the energy shortfall that was turning the country into complete blackout and also hit hard at the economic and social set up of the country.

Pakistanâs natural resources could be utilised more efficiently in such hard times. But his country did not have a magic solution to every problem that Pakistan was facing, but it could call for help in this regard, he added.

Talking about a plan, he said, âWe plan to set up a inter-agency team called the Pakistan Emergency Task Force, which will deal with the short and long term problems of the country. To begin with we plan to have an energy dialogue with business leaders of Pakistan; more importantly, we plan to have financial assistance from OPEC, IMF, ADB and World Bank for ending the energy crisis. The United States is committed to ensure that the economy grows and so do job opportunities for the people of Pakistan.â

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

08-20-2009, 09:20 AM

Obama reaches out to religious parties in Pakistan
* Baloch welcomes change in tone towards Muslims
* Holbrooke rejects JIâs complaints about western assault on Islam

08-21-2009, 09:53 AM

Officials: US missile strike kills 7 in PakistanQUOTEISLAMABAD â A suspected missile attack early Friday destroyed a militant hideout in northwest Pakistan, killing at least seven people, two intelligence officials said.
The officials said some people also were wounded when the two missiles hit a compound in the village of Dande Darpa Khel, near Miran Shah in troubled tribal region of North Waziristan.
They are killing them even on friday. <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/whistle.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='whistle.gif' />

Naresh · 08-21-2009, 06:19 PM

Railways continues to suffer heavy losses

QUOTEISLAMABAD : Pakistan Railways is continuously facing economic losses despite the injection of subsidy worth billions of rupees to make it a profitable public sector organisation over the last two years.

The National Assembly was told on Thursdaythat during 2007-2008 it suffered a loss of Rs12.66 billion which increased to Rs18.609 billion in 2008-2009.

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-22-2009, 02:21 AM

Textile exports decline by 12 per cent in July

QUOTEISLAMABAD - Exports of textile products declined by 12 per cent in the first month (July) of the current financial year as against corresponding period of the last year, Federal Bureau of Statistics reported on Thursday.

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

Naresh · 08-22-2009, 02:23 AM

QUOTE(Mudy @ Aug 21 2009, 09:53 AM)Officials: US missile strike kills 7 in Pakistan<div class='quotetop'>QUOTEISLAMABAD â A suspected missile attack early Friday destroyed a militant hideout in northwest Pakistan, killing at least seven people, two intelligence officials said.
The officials said some people also were wounded when the two missiles hit a compound in the village of Dande Darpa Khel, near Miran Shah in troubled tribal region of North Waziristan.
They are killing them even on friday. <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/whistle.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='whistle.gif' />
[right][snapback]100544[/snapback][/right]
</div>

Mudy Ji :

What have you got against Friday? <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/devilsmiley.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='devilsmiley.gif' />

Cheers <img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/cheers.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='cheers.gif' />

**acharya** · 08-22-2009, 02:41 AM

QUOTEI am the plaintiff on behalf of Muslim Ummah and here are my complaints:

If you add all people of subcontinent India together, you will see that Muslims make almostï»¿ half of subcontinent India but all we got is barely 15% of sub-continent India while Hindus walked away with whopping 85% of subcontinent. See the kind of rip-off was handed to us Muslims by British? As you can see we Muslims have been cheated out of our share of India by Jewish controlled British big time which must be overturned.


QUOTEReassess and reevaluate the previous unfair partition of sub-continent India done by the Jewish controlled British. Help recover Muslim peoples fair share of subcontinent India. Help liberate Muslim majority territories held under Indian occupation such as Kashmir etc. Note that sub-continent of India does not belong to Hindus only; it belongs to all people of sub-continent including Muslims and Sikhs. Divide sub-continent proportionallyï»¿ between Muslims, Sikhs and Hindus which is just and fair.
QUOTEEra of Judeo-Brahmin mayhem and conspiracies is over. Muslims were dealt a bad, unfair and unjust deal under the British Gun. Muslims were told to take what is given or else they wont get any. As we all know that any unjust, unfair and bad deal is null & void in the court of law even if it was signed by both parties. Any prior unjust and unfair deal is therefore null & void. It is never too late to removeï»¿ unjust act and to do justice. Injustice must be remedied!

Login




Remember me Lost Password?