Dental evidence has always suggested out-bound migrations into C Asia and Europe. This was always covered up by the europeanists . C Asia is a center for amplification of atavistic traits due to the isolating geography .
http://www.the-prehistory-of-sri-lanka.d...ter7_5.htm
by S. U. Deriyangala (2003)
The Indodont pattern is ancestral, shared with the relict vanguard :
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Balangoda Man probably represents the earliest evidence of the ancestral dental pattern of anatomically modern humans (AMHS) in <b>South Asia. This Indodont pattern,</b> suggests common ancestry, probably of great time depth encompassing Southeast Europe and parts of Southeast Asia as well (ibid.:138,180,198,203).[/b]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
cited by Deriyangala :
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->During the late Pleistocene,<b> Early Indo-Sundadont populations may have separated into two divisions.</b> <b>One branch (Sundadont).... The second branch (Indodont)</b> migrated to the west and northwest into the Near-Mid East, Eurasia, and eventually North Europe. This hub-and-spoke scenario may well explain why mt DNA results for modern Sri Lankan Vedda suggest they cluster between European and North Asians (Harihara et al. 1988; Saitou and Harihara 1989). Although current molecular genetic data are patchy, populations in India also appear situated between Europe-North Asia groups (Majumdar 1997)....<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, as we now know, the South Asian populations <i>appear</i> to be <i>intermediate</i> because they are ancestral to the <i>atavistic extremes</i> of Europe and North Asia.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The close affinity of [Balangoda Man].... with recent Melanesians, and to a lesser degree with modern Australian Aborigines, suggests that the Indodont (or Early Sundadont) pattern may be ancestral to the populations of the Sahul region. A recent study using Alu insertion polymorphism data indicates that the inhabitants of Sahul are as genetically similar as African groups to an unknown AMHS ancestral population (Stoneking et al. 1997).... Craniometric data... suggest a strong link between Australasians and South Asians (Kennedy 1975).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Indodont affinity to Sundadont anchors Indodont to the original relict populations in India. Therefore, the indodont -derived populations in C Asia, SE europe, etc., <i>must have</i> come from the India region.
http://www.the-prehistory-of-sri-lanka.d...ter7_5.htm
by S. U. Deriyangala (2003)
The Indodont pattern is ancestral, shared with the relict vanguard :
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Balangoda Man probably represents the earliest evidence of the ancestral dental pattern of anatomically modern humans (AMHS) in <b>South Asia. This Indodont pattern,</b> suggests common ancestry, probably of great time depth encompassing Southeast Europe and parts of Southeast Asia as well (ibid.:138,180,198,203).[/b]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
cited by Deriyangala :
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->During the late Pleistocene,<b> Early Indo-Sundadont populations may have separated into two divisions.</b> <b>One branch (Sundadont).... The second branch (Indodont)</b> migrated to the west and northwest into the Near-Mid East, Eurasia, and eventually North Europe. This hub-and-spoke scenario may well explain why mt DNA results for modern Sri Lankan Vedda suggest they cluster between European and North Asians (Harihara et al. 1988; Saitou and Harihara 1989). Although current molecular genetic data are patchy, populations in India also appear situated between Europe-North Asia groups (Majumdar 1997)....<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, as we now know, the South Asian populations <i>appear</i> to be <i>intermediate</i> because they are ancestral to the <i>atavistic extremes</i> of Europe and North Asia.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The close affinity of [Balangoda Man].... with recent Melanesians, and to a lesser degree with modern Australian Aborigines, suggests that the Indodont (or Early Sundadont) pattern may be ancestral to the populations of the Sahul region. A recent study using Alu insertion polymorphism data indicates that the inhabitants of Sahul are as genetically similar as African groups to an unknown AMHS ancestral population (Stoneking et al. 1997).... Craniometric data... suggest a strong link between Australasians and South Asians (Kennedy 1975).<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Indodont affinity to Sundadont anchors Indodont to the original relict populations in India. Therefore, the indodont -derived populations in C Asia, SE europe, etc., <i>must have</i> come from the India region.