06-01-2005, 10:24 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Sunder+May 31 2005, 10:25 AM-->QUOTE(Sunder @ May 31 2005, 10:25 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-dhu+May 31 2005, 08:04 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dhu @ May 31 2005, 08:04 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> Warrant issued against Gurumurthy
Judicial Magistrate-I G Uthamaraj issued the warrant, S Thyagarajan, Public Prosecutor in the case, said here tonight.
The investigating team,<b> which questioned him here some months back, felt that he had some truths that could lead to more information on the murder case,</b> which took place on Sept.3 last year. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am a bit confused here. If the investigating team "feels" that Sri Gurumurthy "could have" some truths that could lead to more information on the murder case, then what is the need to issue an ARREST warrant instead of a Summon? Normally witnesses are not arrested and produced before a judge. No one can "ACCUSE" someone into becoming a witness. Why are Sri Gurumurthy's lawyers not protesting or bringing up this point? <b>Or am I mistaken? Can a person be arrested over an article (which is a single person opinion) and be arrested as hiding information from police.</b>
Sri Gurumurthy himself denies the charges.
http://www.gurumurthy.net/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Statement of Shri.S.Gurumurthy
I am hearing reports that the SIT investigating the Sankararaman murder case has filed an FIR against me for purported offences like not-cooperating with the police, giving false information etc at the time of my interrogation by them. If these reports are true, I term these efforts as ridiculous. I am surprised that even before I am served with any summons, the police have chosen to spread rumours about the purported case.
I would like to state that these intimidatory tactics will not deter me from pursuing the proposed criminal case against SIT officials for leaking out misleading contents about my statements made to them at the time they examined me.
Place: Mumbai
Date: 12th February 2005 <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That is the case in shree G's frivlous case where they claim he is suppresing the facts in a criminal case that could otherwise bring the convicion.
Judicial Magistrate-I G Uthamaraj issued the warrant, S Thyagarajan, Public Prosecutor in the case, said here tonight.
The investigating team,<b> which questioned him here some months back, felt that he had some truths that could lead to more information on the murder case,</b> which took place on Sept.3 last year. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I am a bit confused here. If the investigating team "feels" that Sri Gurumurthy "could have" some truths that could lead to more information on the murder case, then what is the need to issue an ARREST warrant instead of a Summon? Normally witnesses are not arrested and produced before a judge. No one can "ACCUSE" someone into becoming a witness. Why are Sri Gurumurthy's lawyers not protesting or bringing up this point? <b>Or am I mistaken? Can a person be arrested over an article (which is a single person opinion) and be arrested as hiding information from police.</b>
Sri Gurumurthy himself denies the charges.
http://www.gurumurthy.net/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Statement of Shri.S.Gurumurthy
I am hearing reports that the SIT investigating the Sankararaman murder case has filed an FIR against me for purported offences like not-cooperating with the police, giving false information etc at the time of my interrogation by them. If these reports are true, I term these efforts as ridiculous. I am surprised that even before I am served with any summons, the police have chosen to spread rumours about the purported case.
I would like to state that these intimidatory tactics will not deter me from pursuing the proposed criminal case against SIT officials for leaking out misleading contents about my statements made to them at the time they examined me.
Place: Mumbai
Date: 12th February 2005 <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--><!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That is the case in shree G's frivlous case where they claim he is suppresing the facts in a criminal case that could otherwise bring the convicion.