09-07-2005, 05:07 AM
India (like many other countries) was never designed to have complete independence, and it is part of the game that has been going on for few centuries. Gandhi, wittingly/willingly (the only reason I chose to say that is due to his relationship with nationalists) played the role that pleases this "Internationalist Society" that continues its global hegemony.
Gandhi looked to statesmen and nations to use or develop certain methods and institutions. The chief of these are third party settlement, world government, disarmament and an international police force. You can find this in one of the Young India thingies...
Now, do we want to continue with incomplete independence nonsense and build temples to venerate incomplete men? choice is clear. Rest - religion, etc etc associated with these people are irrelevant. He is an accidental hero and has no relevance to the present day problems and future solutions.
Gandhi looked to statesmen and nations to use or develop certain methods and institutions. The chief of these are third party settlement, world government, disarmament and an international police force. You can find this in one of the Young India thingies...
Now, do we want to continue with incomplete independence nonsense and build temples to venerate incomplete men? choice is clear. Rest - religion, etc etc associated with these people are irrelevant. He is an accidental hero and has no relevance to the present day problems and future solutions.