11-27-2005, 09:20 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Nov 27 2005, 09:09 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Nov 27 2005, 09:09 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->By the way does the following prove that there was not much persecution of Hindus in Bengal as you claim:
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
are you virgin to the english language???
what i tried to say was that there was not much initial resistance to muslims from bengal, and then the non brahmin population converted without much fuss and hence there was never much persecution (just like iran) and thus no simmering opposition to muslims later (ie. after they took bengal over) either, unlike north and north west india where there was lots of initial opposition, lots of reluctance abongst brahmins and non brahmins alike to convert, and thus a continuous series of anti muslim efforts.
notice bihar never fought the muslims much... they didnt have a powerful person leading them back then.
anyways ty for vindicating me.... that there was not much opression of bengal under muslims (due to willful conversions to such an extent that bengal had the max camel jockey population at the time of independence)... and hence not much protest.
the poms oppressed and bled bengal dry and bengal had a choice to die or fight.
http://www.atributetohinduism.com/European...0of%20the%20Raj
about the only people who fought muslims and poms in equal measure are the marathas.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
are you virgin to the english language???
what i tried to say was that there was not much initial resistance to muslims from bengal, and then the non brahmin population converted without much fuss and hence there was never much persecution (just like iran) and thus no simmering opposition to muslims later (ie. after they took bengal over) either, unlike north and north west india where there was lots of initial opposition, lots of reluctance abongst brahmins and non brahmins alike to convert, and thus a continuous series of anti muslim efforts.
notice bihar never fought the muslims much... they didnt have a powerful person leading them back then.
anyways ty for vindicating me.... that there was not much opression of bengal under muslims (due to willful conversions to such an extent that bengal had the max camel jockey population at the time of independence)... and hence not much protest.
the poms oppressed and bled bengal dry and bengal had a choice to die or fight.
http://www.atributetohinduism.com/European...0of%20the%20Raj
about the only people who fought muslims and poms in equal measure are the marathas.