Some reinforcement for Kak's assessment of the Ainu and Kennewik as specifically Indic:
http://sambali.blogspot.com/2005/07/news...jomon.html In the Wake of the Jomon
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->A report posted on a U.S. government Web site on the findings of every kind of physical examination except a DNA analysis, which was not possible, concludes that "Kennewick appears to have strongest morphological affinities with populations in Polynesia and southern Asia, and not with American Indians or Europeans in the reference samples."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Both Ainu and Kennewick (tierra del fuego) moved out S. Asia/SEA at 50-40K
At same time Basque (R1b) moved into europe thru the levant corridor with sumerian intermediates-remnants (40K).
Both of these two varied streams are descended from Dravidian base.
At 20-30K C Asia began being colonized from India- by this time, dravid had transformed into sanskrit base. ( http://www.datanumeric.com/dravidian/ ) Last such long distance colonization was at 12K as indicated by the sri lankan microlith evidence and haplo J (which was postneolithic) - both post LGM. Europe received M17 (R1A) from Indus region - M173, M17's predecessor - also Indic origin, had contributed to basque lineage at 30K.
The fact that Basque, Pelasgian, Etruscan, Cretan, etc can be tied to a specific genetic movement out of india at 40K reinforces the 10-20-30K dates for Sanskrit base movement to C Asia. If identity for basque was maintained at 40K, same should certainly apply for Indic at 20-10 K. Independent confirmation is Rig Vedic astronomical evidence at 10K
Last specific movement was Parsi/Armenian/Kurd/Sindoi/Ionianminor At 2-3 K with SSVC expansion.
Neolithic start in NW at 12 K with serious interior antecedents at 30 K unequivocally precludes a dramatic AIT reversal after 10K. and before 10K all movements were out of india per oppenheimer!! Basque can be specifically tied at 40 K. same should be the case with indic base at 20 K-
At 20-10K mongoloid replacement of Ainu type occurs in East
http://sambali.blogspot.com/2005/07/news...jomon.html In the Wake of the Jomon
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->A report posted on a U.S. government Web site on the findings of every kind of physical examination except a DNA analysis, which was not possible, concludes that "Kennewick appears to have strongest morphological affinities with populations in Polynesia and southern Asia, and not with American Indians or Europeans in the reference samples."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Both Ainu and Kennewick (tierra del fuego) moved out S. Asia/SEA at 50-40K
At same time Basque (R1b) moved into europe thru the levant corridor with sumerian intermediates-remnants (40K).
Both of these two varied streams are descended from Dravidian base.
At 20-30K C Asia began being colonized from India- by this time, dravid had transformed into sanskrit base. ( http://www.datanumeric.com/dravidian/ ) Last such long distance colonization was at 12K as indicated by the sri lankan microlith evidence and haplo J (which was postneolithic) - both post LGM. Europe received M17 (R1A) from Indus region - M173, M17's predecessor - also Indic origin, had contributed to basque lineage at 30K.
The fact that Basque, Pelasgian, Etruscan, Cretan, etc can be tied to a specific genetic movement out of india at 40K reinforces the 10-20-30K dates for Sanskrit base movement to C Asia. If identity for basque was maintained at 40K, same should certainly apply for Indic at 20-10 K. Independent confirmation is Rig Vedic astronomical evidence at 10K
Last specific movement was Parsi/Armenian/Kurd/Sindoi/Ionianminor At 2-3 K with SSVC expansion.
Neolithic start in NW at 12 K with serious interior antecedents at 30 K unequivocally precludes a dramatic AIT reversal after 10K. and before 10K all movements were out of india per oppenheimer!! Basque can be specifically tied at 40 K. same should be the case with indic base at 20 K-
At 20-10K mongoloid replacement of Ainu type occurs in East