10-27-2005, 03:35 AM
The senile idiot who wrote it gave a reply in the discussions section after some Hindus tried to edit it but once again he shows no proof for his nonsense, people get registered at wikipidea and make them scrap this garbage and what he says does not even make sense, how does Hindus attending chisti or other ajmer dargahs show that Prithviraj persecuted muslims.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I have removed the biased opinions stated originally i.e. he was blinded and tortured as there is no substantive proof anywhere that this occurred and is usually promoted by anti propogandists such as the Hindutva movement in India. I have replaced it with the reasons behind the final war. It is widely acknowledged even by the residents of Ajmer, his Kingdom, that he persecuted many Muslim Derwishs and refused to allow them even water to drink. The fact that centuries later even the Hindus attend the Shrines of those Derwishes, showing their loyalty to a Saint believed to have come to help them against Prthviraj, proves this very fact.
I have also removed the last point about Muhammad of Ghor being killed by a Khokkar Jatt. It is a well known fact that the true killers of Muhammad of Ghor were never captured and they never revealed themselves during that age. It was thus never proven who did it, although the matter was theorised by many.
The other point is that Khokkars were actually Iranian Sassanids by descent. They are not a Jatt clan. This is further proved by the Ghakkar/Khokkar federation of Rawalpindi who have family records stretching up to the Sassanid Dynasty. Jatts are a Punjabi agricultural group mainly in Punjab.
The problem here is that Prithviraj has always been used by the far right wing groups to grow sympathy and anger from against all invaders and their faith which has reared it's head manily in the last century. Therefore we must remain objective and keep this article free of bias and negative propoganda.
Given time I will further expand this article. --Raja 11:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prithviraj_III<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I have removed the biased opinions stated originally i.e. he was blinded and tortured as there is no substantive proof anywhere that this occurred and is usually promoted by anti propogandists such as the Hindutva movement in India. I have replaced it with the reasons behind the final war. It is widely acknowledged even by the residents of Ajmer, his Kingdom, that he persecuted many Muslim Derwishs and refused to allow them even water to drink. The fact that centuries later even the Hindus attend the Shrines of those Derwishes, showing their loyalty to a Saint believed to have come to help them against Prthviraj, proves this very fact.
I have also removed the last point about Muhammad of Ghor being killed by a Khokkar Jatt. It is a well known fact that the true killers of Muhammad of Ghor were never captured and they never revealed themselves during that age. It was thus never proven who did it, although the matter was theorised by many.
The other point is that Khokkars were actually Iranian Sassanids by descent. They are not a Jatt clan. This is further proved by the Ghakkar/Khokkar federation of Rawalpindi who have family records stretching up to the Sassanid Dynasty. Jatts are a Punjabi agricultural group mainly in Punjab.
The problem here is that Prithviraj has always been used by the far right wing groups to grow sympathy and anger from against all invaders and their faith which has reared it's head manily in the last century. Therefore we must remain objective and keep this article free of bias and negative propoganda.
Given time I will further expand this article. --Raja 11:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Prithviraj_III<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->