11-12-2005, 11:05 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Now are you saying that we accept his descendents as Brahmanas?
Clearly he is of mixed ancestory and cannot become Hindu again.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Wrong, he can become a Hindu again if he so wishes to do so, I have repeatedly said to people that being Hindu has nothing to do with race (are you also going to say that we should strip the Hindu status from the Ahoms who invaded Assam and were later Hinduised and Balinese Hindus since they are not of Indian origin?), can you prove that every Hindu in India is of pure Hindu ancestry?, if not then why the hypocrisy when it comes to accepting Muslims who wish to come back. I am sure Swami Dayananda knew more than us about Sanatana Dharma and he gave the call for shuddhi (and no he didn't go around measuring the nasal index of the Muslims he was reconverting to see if they are of mixed ancestry), the sooner Hindus realise that shuddhi of Muslims is the only permanent solution the better off we will be.
Clearly he is of mixed ancestory and cannot become Hindu again.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Wrong, he can become a Hindu again if he so wishes to do so, I have repeatedly said to people that being Hindu has nothing to do with race (are you also going to say that we should strip the Hindu status from the Ahoms who invaded Assam and were later Hinduised and Balinese Hindus since they are not of Indian origin?), can you prove that every Hindu in India is of pure Hindu ancestry?, if not then why the hypocrisy when it comes to accepting Muslims who wish to come back. I am sure Swami Dayananda knew more than us about Sanatana Dharma and he gave the call for shuddhi (and no he didn't go around measuring the nasal index of the Muslims he was reconverting to see if they are of mixed ancestry), the sooner Hindus realise that shuddhi of Muslims is the only permanent solution the better off we will be.