12-31-2005, 10:13 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Dec 6 2005, 07:43 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Dec 6 2005, 07:43 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Date:Â 5/26/2005 - 10:12 AM
Name:Â Alexander Muster
Email:Â muster@wanadoo.nl
Comments:Â Dear Sirs, There is still the enigma why the Harappa culture inhabitants left their homes( without war?) was it by flood (n mountainsides?) Did people die from methane gasses comming from ancient lakes ripped apart by earth-Quakes; the socalled:"QUARTERNARY LAKEBURST(s)?.my contention is that the Hymalayan mountainrange was tectonically uplifted no earlier than: 1075 Bc.AND that the bottom sediments of the Indian undersea-canyon slitmountain would yield Neocene sediments from the TOP of the Hymalayans! The Uplift of the Hymalayan Mountainrange is extremely young in: written History and, ONLY SEEMS very old, because of the sediment layers that were formed when that Mountairange wa
[right][snapback]42565[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It is assumed people of Indus Valley died or disappeared. What is the rationale for this assumption?Are they not represented genetically in Indian population at all? Can any one tell which group is geneticlly most closely assosiated with people of Indus valley?Changing writing script does not mean vanishing civilization.
Name:Â Alexander Muster
Email:Â muster@wanadoo.nl
Comments:Â Dear Sirs, There is still the enigma why the Harappa culture inhabitants left their homes( without war?) was it by flood (n mountainsides?) Did people die from methane gasses comming from ancient lakes ripped apart by earth-Quakes; the socalled:"QUARTERNARY LAKEBURST(s)?.my contention is that the Hymalayan mountainrange was tectonically uplifted no earlier than: 1075 Bc.AND that the bottom sediments of the Indian undersea-canyon slitmountain would yield Neocene sediments from the TOP of the Hymalayans! The Uplift of the Hymalayan Mountainrange is extremely young in: written History and, ONLY SEEMS very old, because of the sediment layers that were formed when that Mountairange wa
[right][snapback]42565[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
It is assumed people of Indus Valley died or disappeared. What is the rationale for this assumption?Are they not represented genetically in Indian population at all? Can any one tell which group is geneticlly most closely assosiated with people of Indus valley?Changing writing script does not mean vanishing civilization.