01-07-2006, 12:26 AM
thanks a ton for the link bharatvarsh ji , this is really shocking to me , so oak's methods and arguements are flawed though there must be truth in the matter of the taj mahal , is there any other historian other than oak who has done atleast beleivable or partly verifiable evidence on the tejomahalaya.
There are lot of photographs on knapp's site , though heavily derived from oak , is there any other historians work that can be used in a defense of tejomahalya . I know professor millon from new york did some work on it using radio carbon dating many years ago.
There are lot of photographs on knapp's site , though heavily derived from oak , is there any other historians work that can be used in a defense of tejomahalya . I know professor millon from new york did some work on it using radio carbon dating many years ago.