01-07-2006, 12:38 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->thanks a ton for the link bharatvarsh ji , this is really shocking to me , so oak's methods and arguements are flawed though there must be truth in the matter of the taj mahal , is there any other historian other than oak who has done atleast beleivable or partly verifiable evidence on the tejomahalaya.
There are lot of photographs on knapp's site , though heavily derived from oak , is there any other historians work that can be used in a defense of tejomahalya . I know professor millon from new york did some work on it using radio carbon dating many years ago.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't know of any other historian who wrote anything regarding the whole Tejo Mahalaya thing, my advice is for people to not take everything at facevalue and believe everything, the ones whom I take as credible are the books from VOI and from people like Shourie, I assume you know about Voice of India by now, every Hindu should read their books (some of them are online).
There are lot of photographs on knapp's site , though heavily derived from oak , is there any other historians work that can be used in a defense of tejomahalya . I know professor millon from new york did some work on it using radio carbon dating many years ago.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No I don't know of any other historian who wrote anything regarding the whole Tejo Mahalaya thing, my advice is for people to not take everything at facevalue and believe everything, the ones whom I take as credible are the books from VOI and from people like Shourie, I assume you know about Voice of India by now, every Hindu should read their books (some of them are online).