01-15-2006, 12:30 PM
One question regarding about the human migration theory and AIT. How does this Oppenhiemer and National Geography stories disprove AIT? AIT proponents do not say that there was no human migration to India before aryan invation. In fact they admit that there were earlier inhabitants in India and they call them Dravidians. They do not question where they came from.
AIT proponents argue that, Aryans came from west and they brought Hindu civilization to India, composed Vedas etc. In fact they want to take credits for all great things from India and to claim that they are racially superior.
To counter AIT, I think we need to focus on to prove that Hinduism and Indian culture are much older than aryan invasion dates, and of course that that invasion never took place.
AIT proponents argue that, Aryans came from west and they brought Hindu civilization to India, composed Vedas etc. In fact they want to take credits for all great things from India and to claim that they are racially superior.
To counter AIT, I think we need to focus on to prove that Hinduism and Indian culture are much older than aryan invasion dates, and of course that that invasion never took place.