What DNA Says About Aryan Invasion Theory-1

[dhu]

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->It is the Aryan-Mind-Invasion Theory now. Their minds invaded us Indians, who were incapable of speech and agriculture, .... Ooh, wait, Underhill and Witzel probably still believe in their ancestors invading our lands. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Underhill is a participant in the racistfest known as the "Harvard roundtable" presided by Witzel. He may have been goaded by joker Witzel into making some of these statements or it may be his own agenda.

In addition to the prejudiced statements from Kashyap and Underhill, we have this amazing and incomprehensible statement from the national geographic writer himself:

India Acquired Language, Not Genes, From West, Study Says
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If steppe-dwelling Central Asians did lend language and technology, but not many genes, to northern India, the region may have changed far less over the centuries than previously believed.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Basically the AIT claims are being treated as facts over and above the actual genetic results.

Spencer Wells, Genographic project, NAtional Geographic, and Underhill are appearing more and more to be agenda-driven.