<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Is it really true that no dna sample of north indian people show any similarity to the people of INDUS VALLEY CIVILIZATION.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
No, IVC people did not vanish, nor the IVC (SSVC) culture; the IVC culture evolves into the later classical indian culture of the ganga basin. This is proven by archaeology, anthropology, and genetics.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If dna sample shows similarity as in the case of rajputs or jats as in the case Y -SNP GROUPING than why are we hell bent on vanishing harppan people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The genetic papers show that Indians' ancestry is a result of indigineous pre-holocene and holocene era expansions. jats, rajputs, sindhis, punjabis are all included as indigineous inhabitants of inida. holocene means last 10,000 years.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Is it not funny these people claiming their ancestory in far away less developed central asian cultures than this civilization.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Basically, We have a sampling type defect being magnified. Even minor movements into the subcontinent such as those of the huns (mongoloids) get recorded faithfully while all major movements from India into C Asia are never recorded since these were 'less developed C Asian cultures'. As said previously by G. Subramaniam, India has forever been a major net exporter of people . Those peoples who did enter India tended to be economic migrants who did get submerged in the established Indian culture and population.
Ravi Chaudhary (jathistory group) is proving something similar in the case of kanishka and the kushans that these supposed C asian invader groups never seem to leave any mark upon the Indian culture- no languages, no ethnicities, etc- but always seem to mediate crucial Indian social developments- eg the expansion of buddhism into China. Its another case of euro mischiefmaking in india's history. The Kushan period saw prakrits as a rule being spoken deep into C asia.
No, IVC people did not vanish, nor the IVC (SSVC) culture; the IVC culture evolves into the later classical indian culture of the ganga basin. This is proven by archaeology, anthropology, and genetics.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If dna sample shows similarity as in the case of rajputs or jats as in the case Y -SNP GROUPING than why are we hell bent on vanishing harppan people.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The genetic papers show that Indians' ancestry is a result of indigineous pre-holocene and holocene era expansions. jats, rajputs, sindhis, punjabis are all included as indigineous inhabitants of inida. holocene means last 10,000 years.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Is it not funny these people claiming their ancestory in far away less developed central asian cultures than this civilization.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Basically, We have a sampling type defect being magnified. Even minor movements into the subcontinent such as those of the huns (mongoloids) get recorded faithfully while all major movements from India into C Asia are never recorded since these were 'less developed C Asian cultures'. As said previously by G. Subramaniam, India has forever been a major net exporter of people . Those peoples who did enter India tended to be economic migrants who did get submerged in the established Indian culture and population.
Ravi Chaudhary (jathistory group) is proving something similar in the case of kanishka and the kushans that these supposed C asian invader groups never seem to leave any mark upon the Indian culture- no languages, no ethnicities, etc- but always seem to mediate crucial Indian social developments- eg the expansion of buddhism into China. Its another case of euro mischiefmaking in india's history. The Kushan period saw prakrits as a rule being spoken deep into C asia.