01-25-2006, 03:16 AM
others like Bose and Gandhi felt we could exploit the situation to our advantage.
explain pls. just how was gandhi opposed to england during the ww2?? by agreeing to send a million indians to fight in libya, italy, burma???
What ever the case it should be kept in mind that Indians ultimately played a major role in the allied victory in World war II despite S. Bose's opposite vector.
a better way of putting it would be - indians ultimately played a major role in the allied victory (which the poms have only recently acknowledged, the bastards) in ww2, AND NOT SO MUCH IN OUR OWN BLOODY FREEDOM (ie,. we had no such thing)
DESPITE NETAJI AND SARVARKAR'S EVERY EFFORT, THANKS TO GANDHI'S halfwit pro-pom vector.
It is pretty clear that Indian freedom was a consequence of many contingencies: The world war had devastated England's holding capacity. The naval rebellion, the national support for the arrested INA officers and general strikes sent the message home to the British that their days were numbered.
spot on.
It should also not be assumed that the Britons might have given us a better deal- As Kaushal and Acharya have been mentioning they already had a program in place to preclude any possibility of a resurgent India.
they certainly had no intention of letting india become free. winnie C. even had plans to hold on to india forever. they did cos they had no other choice. the poms are the scum of the world, a 100 times worse than the germans. they killed more indians than germany killed jews and gentile combined, and indirectly caused more deaths to indians (by breeding poverty and bengal genocide) than they killed red indians.
They feared the vast Indian army as a new power base with the normally divided people unified by experience of the freedom struggle. Only sad point was that there was no major political alternative to the Congress. This was also a consequence of the British social engineering.
yes. as is the reverence for beevis and butthead a consequence of their social engineering and hogwash.
S.P mukherjee should have been born 30 years before he did - he, along with sarvarkars and gawlikars could have given us the alternative, nipping anglo-socialist G_N congress in the bud.