02-25-2006, 04:57 PM
Check out the latest expose on <b>Steve Farmer</b>.
http://www.sabha.info/4mreport.html#1
http://www.sabha.info/4mreport.html#4
From page 337 of Steve Farmer's PhD dissertation submitted in Sep 1977:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Those who would see "a new proposition for European man" in the last part of this thesis should first note well <b>God's words to man in Genesis 1:28</b>: "And God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"God's words to man" indeed. This "thesis" sounds more like a repository of Bible-thumping "procreationist" bilge!
And there's more:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->We cannot, unfortunately, reconstruct the more complicated arguments, perhaps involving detailed numerical calculations, which Pico planned to use in answering <b>more involved questions, such as determining the date of the end of the world.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"More involved questions". Indeed. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='rolleyes.gif' /><!--endemo-->
And this one takes the cake:
Here is more from "Asst. to the Professor" Steve Farmer's PhD thesis - <b>two is an evil number</b>!
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Jerome tells us that the number two is an "evil" number</b>, a fact he uses to explain why on the second day of Creation we are not told "And God saw that it was good." In the properties of this <b>malevolent number</b> Jerome also . . .
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This pretty much clinches the issue!
http://www.sabha.info/4mreport.html#1
http://www.sabha.info/4mreport.html#4
From page 337 of Steve Farmer's PhD dissertation submitted in Sep 1977:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Those who would see "a new proposition for European man" in the last part of this thesis should first note well <b>God's words to man in Genesis 1:28</b>: "And God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every living thing that moves upon the earth." <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"God's words to man" indeed. This "thesis" sounds more like a repository of Bible-thumping "procreationist" bilge!
And there's more:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->We cannot, unfortunately, reconstruct the more complicated arguments, perhaps involving detailed numerical calculations, which Pico planned to use in answering <b>more involved questions, such as determining the date of the end of the world.</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
"More involved questions". Indeed. <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='rolleyes.gif' /><!--endemo-->And this one takes the cake:
Here is more from "Asst. to the Professor" Steve Farmer's PhD thesis - <b>two is an evil number</b>!
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Jerome tells us that the number two is an "evil" number</b>, a fact he uses to explain why on the second day of Creation we are not told "And God saw that it was good." In the properties of this <b>malevolent number</b> Jerome also . . .
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This pretty much clinches the issue!
