03-21-2006, 03:06 PM
There still are many Jews in middle-east, even now in Iraq, Iran Morocco etc. but they live like normal people.
even nobel laureates are normal people.
Why do you take nobel prize as a metric to measure talent?
what should i take?? intelligence??
tellme whats comon to feynman, schwinger, gellmann, oppenheimer and einstein??
Nobel prize use western scales to decide if it has to be offered to a person.
grapes are sour.
That is why you don't see many people outside western world receiving it.
many people from outside western world have not done much in physics, medicine, chemistry or economics in the last 100 years.
People like Dalai Lama, Suu Kyi were offerred for political purposes.
as were most peace prize winners.
No nobel for Gandhi because he fought against west,
gandhi NEVER fought againstthe west.
doesn't that sound like a joke?
yes, Gandhi and his ahimsha always sounded like a big joke to me.
You don't see many Japanese or Russians among the nobel winners.
says who??
And Jews were living in western world for 2000 years and they understand western thinking and naturally become nobel winners compared to many other people.
really??? so what prevents the africans?? what prevents the indians and chinese?
When western world was developing most of the jews were there and they also naturally happened to be winners along with others. Unfortunately there weren't many Indians and Chinese in Europe at that time and you don't see their name among contributors.
nice excuse.
But today, within a span of less than 50 years, you see a lot of succesful Indians in US. Give them 100 more years, you might see them to be more worthwhile than Jews.
yes, we are a billion strong. there are only 10 million jews in the world now.
Do you want to check? Look at what is happening in diamond trade at Antwerp, Belgium, which once was an exclusive domain of Jews.
dont prove anything just because Gujus have taken antwerp from jews.
whats common to michael Bloomberg, Ross Perot, Michael Dell, George Soros, Nikky Oppenheimer etc?
If you don't see other people in your list of successful people, it is just because they did not have the same opportunity as those in your list.
jews have always delivered, oppertunity or no oppertunity.
I don't have any animosity against Jews, rather I respect their abilities and successes and believe that India and Hindus can learn a lot from them to be succesful in this modern world. However, I can't tolerate when people try to create an aura around them.
no one's trying to create an aura. its there already. we yap no end with our 5 or so nobels, we yap no end cos we have software engineers and nasa scientists - wonder what sort of aura we would have whipped up, if we had as many top guys as they do.
whats common to gary kasparov & bobby fischer ??
even nobel laureates are normal people.
Why do you take nobel prize as a metric to measure talent?
what should i take?? intelligence??
tellme whats comon to feynman, schwinger, gellmann, oppenheimer and einstein??
Nobel prize use western scales to decide if it has to be offered to a person.
grapes are sour.
That is why you don't see many people outside western world receiving it.
many people from outside western world have not done much in physics, medicine, chemistry or economics in the last 100 years.
People like Dalai Lama, Suu Kyi were offerred for political purposes.
as were most peace prize winners.
No nobel for Gandhi because he fought against west,
gandhi NEVER fought againstthe west.
doesn't that sound like a joke?
yes, Gandhi and his ahimsha always sounded like a big joke to me.
You don't see many Japanese or Russians among the nobel winners.
says who??
And Jews were living in western world for 2000 years and they understand western thinking and naturally become nobel winners compared to many other people.
really??? so what prevents the africans?? what prevents the indians and chinese?
When western world was developing most of the jews were there and they also naturally happened to be winners along with others. Unfortunately there weren't many Indians and Chinese in Europe at that time and you don't see their name among contributors.
nice excuse.
But today, within a span of less than 50 years, you see a lot of succesful Indians in US. Give them 100 more years, you might see them to be more worthwhile than Jews.
yes, we are a billion strong. there are only 10 million jews in the world now.
Do you want to check? Look at what is happening in diamond trade at Antwerp, Belgium, which once was an exclusive domain of Jews.
dont prove anything just because Gujus have taken antwerp from jews.
whats common to michael Bloomberg, Ross Perot, Michael Dell, George Soros, Nikky Oppenheimer etc?
If you don't see other people in your list of successful people, it is just because they did not have the same opportunity as those in your list.
jews have always delivered, oppertunity or no oppertunity.
I don't have any animosity against Jews, rather I respect their abilities and successes and believe that India and Hindus can learn a lot from them to be succesful in this modern world. However, I can't tolerate when people try to create an aura around them.
no one's trying to create an aura. its there already. we yap no end with our 5 or so nobels, we yap no end cos we have software engineers and nasa scientists - wonder what sort of aura we would have whipped up, if we had as many top guys as they do.
whats common to gary kasparov & bobby fischer ??