04-29-2006, 12:11 AM
Came via email, ENJOY IT - Latest dream <!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muglai-chicken-stan </b>is the Muslim response to Hindu Rashtra. Envisaging an united Islamic homeland stretching from Sind to Bengal via Kashmir, it is the very antithesis of Hindutva. No, we Muslims are not going to go to Pakistan as the Brahmins command. Instead we will break India once more and re-unite with our brethren in Pakistan and Bangladesh to form the greatest nation of the world - Mughalstan, "The Land of Mughal-Muslims" . Mughalstan is "Greater Pakistan", or "Pakistan No. 2". In other words, Mughalstan is "India's Bosnia" - a nation within a nation. Mughalstan will Inshallah consist of the following coterminous territories :
<b>PAKISTAN </b>comprising Punjab, Afghanistan, Kashmir and Sindh.
<b>BANGISTAN </b>or Greater Bangladesh, comprising modern Bangladesh, southern Assam and the surrounding Muslim-dominated regions.
<b>KHALISTAN</b>, the Sikh Nation of Sufi Muslims. The Sikhs or Nanakshahis are followers of the Muslim Sufi saint Nanak Shah; hence Khalistan is a natural part of Mughalstan.
<b>ROHILSTAN</b>, northern Uttar Pradesh or `Rohilkhand', with a 60 % Muslim population.
<b>MALWASTAN </b>or Malwa in Madhya Pradesh.
<b>BIHARISTAN </b>comprising the Muslim-dominated regions formerly known as `Magadha' in southern Bihar, and of course.
<b>KASHMIR</b>, the Crown of Mughalstan.
Each of these regions individually possesses Mughal-Muslim population exceeding 50 %, and hence these regions justifiably belong to Islamic Mughalstan instead of Brahmin-Occupied Hindu Rashtra.
The population of the resulting Mughalstan homeland is obtained by adding the Muslim populations of Pakistan, Bangladesh and North India, and subtracting the populations for Brahmavarta, Rajputana, Bhojpur and Brahuiland, which are envisaged independant ethnic nations. Using the latest population figures, one obtains
70 % Mughal-Muslim
3 % Vaidik-Brahmins
5 % Vaishya-Vaishnavite
15 % Sudroid-Shaivite
5 % Rajput-Saura
2 % Portuguese-Christian and others.
Since 70 % of Mughalstan's population is Muslim, Mughalstan belongs to us by birthright. The term `Mughal-Muslim' is analogous to the conventional ethnographic terms `Anglo-Saxon Protestant', `Sinhala-Buddhist' or `Russian-Orthodox'. Since each of these peoples have independant nations, it follows that the Mughal-Muslims deserve a homeland as well. Moreover, the creation of Islamic Mughalstan shall pave the way for the creation of Dravida Nadu in South India and Hindutva based states in Central India around Maharashtra.
This Mughalstan is the homeland for the dominant Urdu-speaking Muslims of the North who are mainly descendants of immigrant Muslims and have been historically referred to as `Mughals'. The Muslims of Southern India, however, are mostly Naumuslims or converts and do not speak Urdu as a mother tongue. Thus, the following Naumuslim states may be established in addition to Mughalstan -
<b>Nizamistan </b>comprising the regions around Hyderabad for the `Dakhini Muslims',
<b>Moplahstan </b>situated on the Malabar coast for the Moplahs,
<b>Nasaristan </b>for Sri Lankan Moors.
<b>Who are the Nau-Muslims ? </b>
Nau-Muslim literally means "New Muslims"; they are those Muslims who converted from various pre-Islamic religions - Brahmanism (Vaishnavism and Vedism), Shaivism, Buddhism, etc. They form approximately 10 % of the subcontinent's Muslims. Obviously, they preserved their Indo-Aryan and Dravidian mother tongues, which serves to discriminate them from the Urdu- and Mughali-speaking Mughal-Muslims. The Naumuslims, unlike the Mughal-Muslims, do not form a monolith, and consist of the following distinct divisions :
Moplah (Malayali-speaking Muslims)
Moor (Sinhala and Tamil-speaking Muslims)
Kannadiga Muslims
Ajlaf (Hindu-Bengali-speaking Muslims)
Following a major controversy during the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era regarding the origins of the Bangistani Muslims, the Government asked Abu A. Ghaznavi to settle the matter; after a detailed inquiry, he concluded that [7]
"Abu A. Ghaznavi ... calculated that roughly twenty percent of the Muslims living in Bengal were lineal descendants of foreign settlers, fifty percent had a mixture of foreign blood, and the remaining thirty percent, he claimed, were probably descended from Hindus and other converts."
These 30 % converted Bangistani Muslims refer to themselves as `Ajlaf' and speak Hindu-Bengali written in Bengali alphabets. The Mughal-Muslims living in Bengal speak Musulmani Bengali written in Islamicate alphabets, a dialect of the Mughali language. The relative preponderance of Muslims in Bengal does not, as suggested by Brahmanist Hindutva historians, attest to `conversions', but is due to the attested large-scale immigration of Arabi Mughals, in contrast to the Northern Mughals who entered via the Hindu Kush.
<b>What is Islamestan ? </b>
Islamestan means "Land of Islam" and is a synonym for `Islamic World' or `Dar-ul-Islam'; it includes all Muslim-dominated countries. In 2000 AD, the world was inhabited by approximately 1 billion Muslims, of which 300 million were Mughal-Muslims inhabiting Mughalstan. Thus, one-third of the world's Muslims inhabit Mughalstan, which is the most populous sub-region of Islamestan.
<b>What is Pan-Islamism ? </b>
A movement seeking to work for greater togetherness between the Muslims of the world. Shiahs, Sunnis and Sufis (including Sikhs) are viewed as forming one united Muslim community. Pan-Islamism refuses to distinguish between Sunni, Shiah and Sufi; all are treated as equal. Indeed, many Pan-Islamists only identify themselves as `Muslim' and not as `Wahhabi' or `Shiah'. This phenomenon has historically been most prevalent in South Asia, where the majority of Mughal-Muslims refused to accept Sunni-Shiah differences. Indeed, Shiah-Sunni intermarriages are universal, cf. Humayun's wife, who was a Shiah. It is indeed often impossible in the case of certain Mughal Caliphs to determine whether the person was a Sunni or a Shiah; it is only known that they were Muslim.
Neo-Mughals believe that Pan-Islamism is best achieved in a step-wise nature, namely first establishment of an Arabestan, Turkestan and Mughalstan followed by the union of these states in a global `Union of Islamestan'. Certain Pan-Islamists wish to restore the global Caliphate, others desire a loose federation.
<b>What is Bangistan ? </b>
Bangistan refers to the geographically well-defined region comprising East Bengali, Assam and West Bengal. This socio-economic unit was historically united as a province of the Mughalstan Caliphate, with the Mughal-Muslims forming the dominant race there, a fact confirmed by the detailed research of Khondkar Fazli Rabi [8] -
" It can safely, and without any fear of contradiction, be asserted that the ancestors of the present Musalmans of this country were certainly those Musalmans who came here from foreign parts during the rule of the former sovereigns, and that the present generation of Musalmans are the offspring of that dominant race who remained masters of the land for 562 years."
In other words, they are ethnically Mughal-Muslims indistinguishable from the Mughal-Muslims of Punjab. They also speak the same Mughali language; the only difference is one of dialect: the Mughal-Muslims of Punjab speak the pure Ghaznavid Zaban-e-Urdu dialect of Mughali, whilst the Mughal-Muslims of Bangistan speak the Musulmani Bengali dialect of Mughali. Indeed, the tragic conflict between Bengali Mughal-Muslims and Punjabi Mughal-Muslims has no historical roots: it was engineered by the Brahmins under Indira Gandhi.
<b>What are Rohilstan, Biharistan and Oudh ? </b>
These are those parts of Mughalstan which were illicitly annexed by Bharat in 1947 and which, as of 2000, are still Brahmin Occupied Territories.
<b>Rohilstan </b>, referred to by Brahmins as `Rohilkhand', comprises the historical Deoband region which was an integral part of the Mughal Caliphate. With Mughal-Muslims forming more than 50 % of the population, it is a natural part of Mughalstan.
<b>Biharistan, or Viharistan</b> , meaning "Land of Viharas (Buddhist shrines)", comprising the ancient Magadha nation just south of the Ganges. The Mughal-Muslims, finding this region depopulated as a result of the Brahminist-engineered Buddhist Holocaust of the 2nd century AD, settled in this fertile region, ultimately forming a majority in this province. Mithila and Bhojpur, however, remained non-Muslim, and these regions are historically not part of Biharistan. They are thus not part of Mughalstan.
Oudh is the Urdu name for the region known in Prakrits as Avadha. Excluding the Brahmavarta region of Kannauj, this region has been historically Muslim-dominated.
<b>What is Pakistan ? </b>
Pakistan stands for P - Punjab, A - Afghania, K -Kashmir and S - Sind and denotes these regions. The term thus denotes those parts of Mughalstan which were liberated from Anglo-Brahmin tyranny in 1947. The Mughal-Muslim leadership at the time laid claim to the whole of Mughalstan; however, as a result of the Anglo-Brahmin conspiracy, large parts were annexed to Bharat. Indeed, the Brahminists later managed to split the Pakistani and Bangistani parts of Mughalstan from each other under Indira Gandhi the Brahmin.
<b>What are Moplahstan, Nizamistan, Dakhnistan and Nasaristan ? </b>
These are the proposed homelands for the Naumuslims (converts) -
<b>Moplahstan </b>for the Moplahs (Malayali Muslims),
<b>Dakhinistan </b>for the Dakhinis (Marathi- and Dakhini-speaking Muslims) and
<b>Nasaristan </b>for the Moors (Tamil-speaking Sri Lankan and Tamil Nadu Moors).
<b>Dakhinistan </b>is also referred to as Osmanistan or Nizamistan. These homelands were proposed by Choudhury Rehmat Ali, the father of Pakistan.
However, the number of Naumuslims is rather low, and the regions in which they form a majority are of limited extent. Thus, they may not be feasible as economically self-sufficient units. Nizamistan is, in addition, land-locked. The shared bond of a common mother-tongue with the pre-Islamic peoples renders separatist tendencies among these communities less powerful.
This said, a certain section of Mughalstan supporters does wish to unite these regions, especially Nizamistan, with the nothern Mughalstan.
<b>What is Urdustan ? </b>
In the late 1990s, Kashif started a website called `Urdustan' devoted to Urdu poetry. Certain persons mistakenly assumed that this was an Islamist site, and the term `Urdustan' is sometimes erroneously used for Mughalstan. Mughalstan supporters object to the usage of Urdustan because :
"Urdustan" literally means `Land of Tents', because `Urdu' means tent, and the name of the language is in fact "Zaban-e-Urdu". The impression created is that of a rather inglorious nomadic steppeland. Mughalstan means "Land of Mughals", and conjures up images of Mughal imperial grandeur - the Taj Mahal and the Qutb Minar.
Bangladesh is technically speaking not an Urdu-speaking region and is hence not part of Urdustan. However, the Bengali Muslims are overwhelmingly Mughal-Muslims, the descendants of Arabi Mughal seafarers. They also speak Musulmani Bengali, which is a dialect of Mughali (but NOT of Urdu), and historically, Bengal was part of the Mughal Caliphate. Thus, Bengali Muslims do not consider themselves part of Urdustan, but do consider themselves part of Mughalstan.
Historically Urdustan is not recorded, yet Mughalstan is however recorded in the 16th century Babur nama. Mughalstan is thus a historical reality.
Tartar and Mughal are two different races; Mughal very clearly implies the Urdu-speaking Muslims, whilst the Tartars were pagan Mongols. Thus, the oft-repeated calumny that the Mughals are pagan Mongols is wrong.
<b>Mongols and Mughal :</b> Hindu fundamentalist historians often write that the Mughals were ashamed of their `pagan Mongol' descent. In fact, Mughal-Muslims are proud of their partial descent from the Genghizide rulers, whom they regard as Muslim and not pagan, a fact confirmed by Gengiz Khan's sermon delivered atop the Bukhara minar. The Khwarezm Shah and his then puppet Caliph are regarded as polytheists. Thus, Genghiz Khan's legacy was in fact Islamic to the core. The destruction of the minuscule Iraqi Caliphate of Bagdad was in fact a restoration of Islam. Additionally, Timur is accepted as a Muslim warrior who fought against polytheism. Of course, there were pagan Mongols, referred to as Tartar in order to distinguish them form the Muslim Mughals. In any case, this argument has no bearing on South Asia, where the Mughals are Muslims only.
Just as Sanskrit-speaking Brahmins are a minority and do not comprise all Brahmins, so Urdu-speaking Mughals, although the ideal in the past, are not so today. Mughalstan directly appeals to these persons far more powerfully than Urdustan, especially the Bangladeshi Muslims.
<b>What is this Islamic Supremacy ? </b>
These are Islamists who wish to subjugate all of South Asia by force and Islamise the populations inhabiting these regions. Islamic supremacists are very rare in the late 21st century, and there is no visible trend or base of support which would allow them to carry such a political program into effect. Islamic supremacists are generally an embarassment to Islamic nationalists.
<b>Is Mughalstanism anti-Hindu ? </b>
Neo-Mughals avoid using the misnomer `Hindu' as far as possible as they consider `Hinduism' an invention of the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era designed to further Brahmanist imperialist goals. Thus, Neo-Mughals accept that Vaidik-Brahmins, Vaishya-Vaishnavas, Rajput-Sauras, Sudroid-Shaivas each have their own civilizations and the right to their own cultures and, by extension, to their own homelands.
<b>Is Mughalstanism anti-Brahman ? </b>
Most Mughalstanists are far less anti-Brahmin than other movements. Dalit-Dravidian nationalists, for example, view Brahmins as a racial enemy who are to be ethnically cleansed. Mughal-Muslim nationalists by contrast accept that the Brahmin population in Mughalstan contributed significantly to the Mughal caliphate and many support the creation of a Brahmin homeland around Kannauj - Brahmavarta or `Land of Brahmins'.
However, all Neo-Mughals recognize that the Pseudo-Secular (ie. Congress), Hindutva (Sangh Parivar) and Communist politics of most Brahmins has caused enormous disruption and misery. Because of this, many Mughalstanists have become anti-Brahmin. Although most Neo-Mughals oppose anti-Brahmanism, nearly all tolerate anti-Brahmins as political allies, in part because anti-Brahmanism is an understandable reaction to Nehruvian Brahmin Imperialism.
<b>Is Mughalstan Against Hindu Rashtra ? </b>
No ! Hindu Rashtra can be established in Maharashtra, Utkal-desh and Gujarat, in short, those regions where Indo-Aryans dominate. If the Dravidians also desire a Hindu Rashtra, then they are free to do so, however, most Mughals would not consider this very likely - Dravidian nationalist based states are more likely in the South. Most Mughal Caliphs did not interfere in affairs south of the Vindhyas, and that would be the policy of Mughalstan.
Establishment of a Mughalstan would facilitate rather than hinder the establishment of Hindu Rashtra. In this case, the common enemy are the liberals. Lest we both are annihilated in the multi-cultural cess-pit, let us save ourselves and our heritage.
<b>Yes, the Mughal-Muslims will rise</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Muglai-chicken-stan </b>is the Muslim response to Hindu Rashtra. Envisaging an united Islamic homeland stretching from Sind to Bengal via Kashmir, it is the very antithesis of Hindutva. No, we Muslims are not going to go to Pakistan as the Brahmins command. Instead we will break India once more and re-unite with our brethren in Pakistan and Bangladesh to form the greatest nation of the world - Mughalstan, "The Land of Mughal-Muslims" . Mughalstan is "Greater Pakistan", or "Pakistan No. 2". In other words, Mughalstan is "India's Bosnia" - a nation within a nation. Mughalstan will Inshallah consist of the following coterminous territories :
<b>PAKISTAN </b>comprising Punjab, Afghanistan, Kashmir and Sindh.
<b>BANGISTAN </b>or Greater Bangladesh, comprising modern Bangladesh, southern Assam and the surrounding Muslim-dominated regions.
<b>KHALISTAN</b>, the Sikh Nation of Sufi Muslims. The Sikhs or Nanakshahis are followers of the Muslim Sufi saint Nanak Shah; hence Khalistan is a natural part of Mughalstan.
<b>ROHILSTAN</b>, northern Uttar Pradesh or `Rohilkhand', with a 60 % Muslim population.
<b>MALWASTAN </b>or Malwa in Madhya Pradesh.
<b>BIHARISTAN </b>comprising the Muslim-dominated regions formerly known as `Magadha' in southern Bihar, and of course.
<b>KASHMIR</b>, the Crown of Mughalstan.
Each of these regions individually possesses Mughal-Muslim population exceeding 50 %, and hence these regions justifiably belong to Islamic Mughalstan instead of Brahmin-Occupied Hindu Rashtra.
The population of the resulting Mughalstan homeland is obtained by adding the Muslim populations of Pakistan, Bangladesh and North India, and subtracting the populations for Brahmavarta, Rajputana, Bhojpur and Brahuiland, which are envisaged independant ethnic nations. Using the latest population figures, one obtains
70 % Mughal-Muslim
3 % Vaidik-Brahmins
5 % Vaishya-Vaishnavite
15 % Sudroid-Shaivite
5 % Rajput-Saura
2 % Portuguese-Christian and others.
Since 70 % of Mughalstan's population is Muslim, Mughalstan belongs to us by birthright. The term `Mughal-Muslim' is analogous to the conventional ethnographic terms `Anglo-Saxon Protestant', `Sinhala-Buddhist' or `Russian-Orthodox'. Since each of these peoples have independant nations, it follows that the Mughal-Muslims deserve a homeland as well. Moreover, the creation of Islamic Mughalstan shall pave the way for the creation of Dravida Nadu in South India and Hindutva based states in Central India around Maharashtra.
This Mughalstan is the homeland for the dominant Urdu-speaking Muslims of the North who are mainly descendants of immigrant Muslims and have been historically referred to as `Mughals'. The Muslims of Southern India, however, are mostly Naumuslims or converts and do not speak Urdu as a mother tongue. Thus, the following Naumuslim states may be established in addition to Mughalstan -
<b>Nizamistan </b>comprising the regions around Hyderabad for the `Dakhini Muslims',
<b>Moplahstan </b>situated on the Malabar coast for the Moplahs,
<b>Nasaristan </b>for Sri Lankan Moors.
<b>Who are the Nau-Muslims ? </b>
Nau-Muslim literally means "New Muslims"; they are those Muslims who converted from various pre-Islamic religions - Brahmanism (Vaishnavism and Vedism), Shaivism, Buddhism, etc. They form approximately 10 % of the subcontinent's Muslims. Obviously, they preserved their Indo-Aryan and Dravidian mother tongues, which serves to discriminate them from the Urdu- and Mughali-speaking Mughal-Muslims. The Naumuslims, unlike the Mughal-Muslims, do not form a monolith, and consist of the following distinct divisions :
Moplah (Malayali-speaking Muslims)
Moor (Sinhala and Tamil-speaking Muslims)
Kannadiga Muslims
Ajlaf (Hindu-Bengali-speaking Muslims)
Following a major controversy during the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era regarding the origins of the Bangistani Muslims, the Government asked Abu A. Ghaznavi to settle the matter; after a detailed inquiry, he concluded that [7]
"Abu A. Ghaznavi ... calculated that roughly twenty percent of the Muslims living in Bengal were lineal descendants of foreign settlers, fifty percent had a mixture of foreign blood, and the remaining thirty percent, he claimed, were probably descended from Hindus and other converts."
These 30 % converted Bangistani Muslims refer to themselves as `Ajlaf' and speak Hindu-Bengali written in Bengali alphabets. The Mughal-Muslims living in Bengal speak Musulmani Bengali written in Islamicate alphabets, a dialect of the Mughali language. The relative preponderance of Muslims in Bengal does not, as suggested by Brahmanist Hindutva historians, attest to `conversions', but is due to the attested large-scale immigration of Arabi Mughals, in contrast to the Northern Mughals who entered via the Hindu Kush.
<b>What is Islamestan ? </b>
Islamestan means "Land of Islam" and is a synonym for `Islamic World' or `Dar-ul-Islam'; it includes all Muslim-dominated countries. In 2000 AD, the world was inhabited by approximately 1 billion Muslims, of which 300 million were Mughal-Muslims inhabiting Mughalstan. Thus, one-third of the world's Muslims inhabit Mughalstan, which is the most populous sub-region of Islamestan.
<b>What is Pan-Islamism ? </b>
A movement seeking to work for greater togetherness between the Muslims of the world. Shiahs, Sunnis and Sufis (including Sikhs) are viewed as forming one united Muslim community. Pan-Islamism refuses to distinguish between Sunni, Shiah and Sufi; all are treated as equal. Indeed, many Pan-Islamists only identify themselves as `Muslim' and not as `Wahhabi' or `Shiah'. This phenomenon has historically been most prevalent in South Asia, where the majority of Mughal-Muslims refused to accept Sunni-Shiah differences. Indeed, Shiah-Sunni intermarriages are universal, cf. Humayun's wife, who was a Shiah. It is indeed often impossible in the case of certain Mughal Caliphs to determine whether the person was a Sunni or a Shiah; it is only known that they were Muslim.
Neo-Mughals believe that Pan-Islamism is best achieved in a step-wise nature, namely first establishment of an Arabestan, Turkestan and Mughalstan followed by the union of these states in a global `Union of Islamestan'. Certain Pan-Islamists wish to restore the global Caliphate, others desire a loose federation.
<b>What is Bangistan ? </b>
Bangistan refers to the geographically well-defined region comprising East Bengali, Assam and West Bengal. This socio-economic unit was historically united as a province of the Mughalstan Caliphate, with the Mughal-Muslims forming the dominant race there, a fact confirmed by the detailed research of Khondkar Fazli Rabi [8] -
" It can safely, and without any fear of contradiction, be asserted that the ancestors of the present Musalmans of this country were certainly those Musalmans who came here from foreign parts during the rule of the former sovereigns, and that the present generation of Musalmans are the offspring of that dominant race who remained masters of the land for 562 years."
In other words, they are ethnically Mughal-Muslims indistinguishable from the Mughal-Muslims of Punjab. They also speak the same Mughali language; the only difference is one of dialect: the Mughal-Muslims of Punjab speak the pure Ghaznavid Zaban-e-Urdu dialect of Mughali, whilst the Mughal-Muslims of Bangistan speak the Musulmani Bengali dialect of Mughali. Indeed, the tragic conflict between Bengali Mughal-Muslims and Punjabi Mughal-Muslims has no historical roots: it was engineered by the Brahmins under Indira Gandhi.
<b>What are Rohilstan, Biharistan and Oudh ? </b>
These are those parts of Mughalstan which were illicitly annexed by Bharat in 1947 and which, as of 2000, are still Brahmin Occupied Territories.
<b>Rohilstan </b>, referred to by Brahmins as `Rohilkhand', comprises the historical Deoband region which was an integral part of the Mughal Caliphate. With Mughal-Muslims forming more than 50 % of the population, it is a natural part of Mughalstan.
<b>Biharistan, or Viharistan</b> , meaning "Land of Viharas (Buddhist shrines)", comprising the ancient Magadha nation just south of the Ganges. The Mughal-Muslims, finding this region depopulated as a result of the Brahminist-engineered Buddhist Holocaust of the 2nd century AD, settled in this fertile region, ultimately forming a majority in this province. Mithila and Bhojpur, however, remained non-Muslim, and these regions are historically not part of Biharistan. They are thus not part of Mughalstan.
Oudh is the Urdu name for the region known in Prakrits as Avadha. Excluding the Brahmavarta region of Kannauj, this region has been historically Muslim-dominated.
<b>What is Pakistan ? </b>
Pakistan stands for P - Punjab, A - Afghania, K -Kashmir and S - Sind and denotes these regions. The term thus denotes those parts of Mughalstan which were liberated from Anglo-Brahmin tyranny in 1947. The Mughal-Muslim leadership at the time laid claim to the whole of Mughalstan; however, as a result of the Anglo-Brahmin conspiracy, large parts were annexed to Bharat. Indeed, the Brahminists later managed to split the Pakistani and Bangistani parts of Mughalstan from each other under Indira Gandhi the Brahmin.
<b>What are Moplahstan, Nizamistan, Dakhnistan and Nasaristan ? </b>
These are the proposed homelands for the Naumuslims (converts) -
<b>Moplahstan </b>for the Moplahs (Malayali Muslims),
<b>Dakhinistan </b>for the Dakhinis (Marathi- and Dakhini-speaking Muslims) and
<b>Nasaristan </b>for the Moors (Tamil-speaking Sri Lankan and Tamil Nadu Moors).
<b>Dakhinistan </b>is also referred to as Osmanistan or Nizamistan. These homelands were proposed by Choudhury Rehmat Ali, the father of Pakistan.
However, the number of Naumuslims is rather low, and the regions in which they form a majority are of limited extent. Thus, they may not be feasible as economically self-sufficient units. Nizamistan is, in addition, land-locked. The shared bond of a common mother-tongue with the pre-Islamic peoples renders separatist tendencies among these communities less powerful.
This said, a certain section of Mughalstan supporters does wish to unite these regions, especially Nizamistan, with the nothern Mughalstan.
<b>What is Urdustan ? </b>
In the late 1990s, Kashif started a website called `Urdustan' devoted to Urdu poetry. Certain persons mistakenly assumed that this was an Islamist site, and the term `Urdustan' is sometimes erroneously used for Mughalstan. Mughalstan supporters object to the usage of Urdustan because :
"Urdustan" literally means `Land of Tents', because `Urdu' means tent, and the name of the language is in fact "Zaban-e-Urdu". The impression created is that of a rather inglorious nomadic steppeland. Mughalstan means "Land of Mughals", and conjures up images of Mughal imperial grandeur - the Taj Mahal and the Qutb Minar.
Bangladesh is technically speaking not an Urdu-speaking region and is hence not part of Urdustan. However, the Bengali Muslims are overwhelmingly Mughal-Muslims, the descendants of Arabi Mughal seafarers. They also speak Musulmani Bengali, which is a dialect of Mughali (but NOT of Urdu), and historically, Bengal was part of the Mughal Caliphate. Thus, Bengali Muslims do not consider themselves part of Urdustan, but do consider themselves part of Mughalstan.
Historically Urdustan is not recorded, yet Mughalstan is however recorded in the 16th century Babur nama. Mughalstan is thus a historical reality.
Tartar and Mughal are two different races; Mughal very clearly implies the Urdu-speaking Muslims, whilst the Tartars were pagan Mongols. Thus, the oft-repeated calumny that the Mughals are pagan Mongols is wrong.
<b>Mongols and Mughal :</b> Hindu fundamentalist historians often write that the Mughals were ashamed of their `pagan Mongol' descent. In fact, Mughal-Muslims are proud of their partial descent from the Genghizide rulers, whom they regard as Muslim and not pagan, a fact confirmed by Gengiz Khan's sermon delivered atop the Bukhara minar. The Khwarezm Shah and his then puppet Caliph are regarded as polytheists. Thus, Genghiz Khan's legacy was in fact Islamic to the core. The destruction of the minuscule Iraqi Caliphate of Bagdad was in fact a restoration of Islam. Additionally, Timur is accepted as a Muslim warrior who fought against polytheism. Of course, there were pagan Mongols, referred to as Tartar in order to distinguish them form the Muslim Mughals. In any case, this argument has no bearing on South Asia, where the Mughals are Muslims only.
Just as Sanskrit-speaking Brahmins are a minority and do not comprise all Brahmins, so Urdu-speaking Mughals, although the ideal in the past, are not so today. Mughalstan directly appeals to these persons far more powerfully than Urdustan, especially the Bangladeshi Muslims.
<b>What is this Islamic Supremacy ? </b>
These are Islamists who wish to subjugate all of South Asia by force and Islamise the populations inhabiting these regions. Islamic supremacists are very rare in the late 21st century, and there is no visible trend or base of support which would allow them to carry such a political program into effect. Islamic supremacists are generally an embarassment to Islamic nationalists.
<b>Is Mughalstanism anti-Hindu ? </b>
Neo-Mughals avoid using the misnomer `Hindu' as far as possible as they consider `Hinduism' an invention of the Anglo-Brahmin colonial era designed to further Brahmanist imperialist goals. Thus, Neo-Mughals accept that Vaidik-Brahmins, Vaishya-Vaishnavas, Rajput-Sauras, Sudroid-Shaivas each have their own civilizations and the right to their own cultures and, by extension, to their own homelands.
<b>Is Mughalstanism anti-Brahman ? </b>
Most Mughalstanists are far less anti-Brahmin than other movements. Dalit-Dravidian nationalists, for example, view Brahmins as a racial enemy who are to be ethnically cleansed. Mughal-Muslim nationalists by contrast accept that the Brahmin population in Mughalstan contributed significantly to the Mughal caliphate and many support the creation of a Brahmin homeland around Kannauj - Brahmavarta or `Land of Brahmins'.
However, all Neo-Mughals recognize that the Pseudo-Secular (ie. Congress), Hindutva (Sangh Parivar) and Communist politics of most Brahmins has caused enormous disruption and misery. Because of this, many Mughalstanists have become anti-Brahmin. Although most Neo-Mughals oppose anti-Brahmanism, nearly all tolerate anti-Brahmins as political allies, in part because anti-Brahmanism is an understandable reaction to Nehruvian Brahmin Imperialism.
<b>Is Mughalstan Against Hindu Rashtra ? </b>
No ! Hindu Rashtra can be established in Maharashtra, Utkal-desh and Gujarat, in short, those regions where Indo-Aryans dominate. If the Dravidians also desire a Hindu Rashtra, then they are free to do so, however, most Mughals would not consider this very likely - Dravidian nationalist based states are more likely in the South. Most Mughal Caliphs did not interfere in affairs south of the Vindhyas, and that would be the policy of Mughalstan.
Establishment of a Mughalstan would facilitate rather than hinder the establishment of Hindu Rashtra. In this case, the common enemy are the liberals. Lest we both are annihilated in the multi-cultural cess-pit, let us save ourselves and our heritage.
<b>Yes, the Mughal-Muslims will rise</b>.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /><!--endemo-->