05-03-2006, 02:32 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Mahadevan is more honest than the witzel/parpola circus, but he does have his ideological blinders on. He did not come out with the racist reflex of hoax
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
exactly, atleast he is not racist. And out right deny the evidence as hoax as "creationist indologists".
But, i still do not understand why he makes a comment that there is a separate Aryan or Indo aryan language and then a dravidian language.
Can somebody give pointers links where some sensible arguments are put forward to counter this notion of unrelated Indo-aryan and dravidian language/culture.
bengurion
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
exactly, atleast he is not racist. And out right deny the evidence as hoax as "creationist indologists".
But, i still do not understand why he makes a comment that there is a separate Aryan or Indo aryan language and then a dravidian language.
Can somebody give pointers links where some sensible arguments are put forward to counter this notion of unrelated Indo-aryan and dravidian language/culture.
bengurion