05-08-2006, 11:12 AM
Chinese and indians are natural friends and ideally should be friendly competitors and dual overlords of eurasia. in fact, given the antiquity and relative continuity of their civilization, only the chinese among the world cultures have the adhikara to sit at the same table with indians, with exceptions for SE asians and japanese. (Even though I respect the native american and african civilization, these cultures simply never achived the calibre of the native asian civs)
Few things that i respect the chinese for:
1 Chinese did give a bloody nose to the christist imperialists with their boxer rebellion aimed at driving away missionaries (japanese went one step further and exposed the christist hoax)------ this shows that traditional chinese culture were as dynamic as Indian Dharma (Vivekananda, Savarkar) at the turn of the century- sadly no more thanks to the extended communist nigtmare.. pls educate us on this.
2 They have banned the vatican mind control cult and even lecture the pope abut pedophilia
3 They have made territorial claims to the american mainland
4 They have geostategic vision in supplying ICBMs to islamic states which can sap american power and pretensions. although it is highly reckless.
5 defeat of americans twice (in vietnam and korea)
Few bad things :
1 propping up pakistan terror state and proliferating nukes to them
2 funding marxists-naxals in india with intent to destroy the indian economy. the missionaries will then piggyback to power in the cultural wasteland created (as in cambodia).
3 tibet - though the power vacuum in tibet would inevitably have been filled by either russia or US- stooge Nehru fulfilled his mission to sideline India.
4 Nepal
Communism did physically delete away the traditional chinese intellectual class in various pogroms. Chinese should understand that communism is a pseudo-intellectual variety of abrahamism, although the inherent chinese practicability seems to prevent them from making such Dharmic considerations. I do not think they can be mobilized intellectually against abrahamism (eg in Indonesia against the islamists), as pointed out by Rajiv malhotra. Intellectually, they have fallen into the western framework.
I picked up somewhere that Chinese had a favorable view of india until the british Indian troops were used against them.
Sometimes I think the nationalist Mao probably saved China from Christianization.. just look at what happened to taiwan under the fleeing Kai-shek.
I also think that there have significant Chinese/SE asian contributions to Indian culture though the dominant euro paradigms prevent further elucidation.
Few things that i respect the chinese for:
1 Chinese did give a bloody nose to the christist imperialists with their boxer rebellion aimed at driving away missionaries (japanese went one step further and exposed the christist hoax)------ this shows that traditional chinese culture were as dynamic as Indian Dharma (Vivekananda, Savarkar) at the turn of the century- sadly no more thanks to the extended communist nigtmare.. pls educate us on this.
2 They have banned the vatican mind control cult and even lecture the pope abut pedophilia
3 They have made territorial claims to the american mainland
4 They have geostategic vision in supplying ICBMs to islamic states which can sap american power and pretensions. although it is highly reckless.
5 defeat of americans twice (in vietnam and korea)
Few bad things :
1 propping up pakistan terror state and proliferating nukes to them
2 funding marxists-naxals in india with intent to destroy the indian economy. the missionaries will then piggyback to power in the cultural wasteland created (as in cambodia).
3 tibet - though the power vacuum in tibet would inevitably have been filled by either russia or US- stooge Nehru fulfilled his mission to sideline India.
4 Nepal
Communism did physically delete away the traditional chinese intellectual class in various pogroms. Chinese should understand that communism is a pseudo-intellectual variety of abrahamism, although the inherent chinese practicability seems to prevent them from making such Dharmic considerations. I do not think they can be mobilized intellectually against abrahamism (eg in Indonesia against the islamists), as pointed out by Rajiv malhotra. Intellectually, they have fallen into the western framework.
I picked up somewhere that Chinese had a favorable view of india until the british Indian troops were used against them.
Sometimes I think the nationalist Mao probably saved China from Christianization.. just look at what happened to taiwan under the fleeing Kai-shek.
I also think that there have significant Chinese/SE asian contributions to Indian culture though the dominant euro paradigms prevent further elucidation.