05-16-2006, 12:33 AM
This is a tragedy of India that we have always quoted the records of foregin writers be it in the times of Alexander or in the period of muslim invaders that we take all there lies as words of gods and never mention our own indian records maintained by native writers.
Further we can believe stories of bhatt who always produced warriors out of agani or always linked ancessetery to Rama or king Vikarmaditya.
Harshwardan has been recorded as jat king by sarv khap panchyat republic records and not reported non jat or from any other cast by any other record .
Again these Sarv khap republic records are not jat records but records of all the 36 casts united under one democratic republic.
There genealogy records of tomar king has been fond true when compared with other historical documents, as compared to false history still taught in Indian history books where they say that four or five chohan kings ruled delhi four a period as short as 4-5 years each and then again mention that prithviraj got his kingdom from maternal grandfather anangpal tomar.
Where respected Farishta was still under confusion wether ghori was killed by ghakkar or khokkar these records gave the name of jat senapati aniruddh khokkar who severed ghori head and compare this to Mat chuk chohan.... story fed to India TV audience.What a shame.
They have reported in detail various events and the speeches of different leaders and greatly praised the role of republic warriors wether he was gujjar jat or from any other cast as gujjar general of this republic force who fough Temur invasion was praised greatly for the extreme bravery which he displayed in battle field.
They had no selfish interest so their records are more geniune than anyother court historian records.
Jat history research is a relatively new area and it will crumble many age old false propogandas carried by vested interests such as leftist historians.
Further we can believe stories of bhatt who always produced warriors out of agani or always linked ancessetery to Rama or king Vikarmaditya.
Harshwardan has been recorded as jat king by sarv khap panchyat republic records and not reported non jat or from any other cast by any other record .
Again these Sarv khap republic records are not jat records but records of all the 36 casts united under one democratic republic.
There genealogy records of tomar king has been fond true when compared with other historical documents, as compared to false history still taught in Indian history books where they say that four or five chohan kings ruled delhi four a period as short as 4-5 years each and then again mention that prithviraj got his kingdom from maternal grandfather anangpal tomar.
Where respected Farishta was still under confusion wether ghori was killed by ghakkar or khokkar these records gave the name of jat senapati aniruddh khokkar who severed ghori head and compare this to Mat chuk chohan.... story fed to India TV audience.What a shame.
They have reported in detail various events and the speeches of different leaders and greatly praised the role of republic warriors wether he was gujjar jat or from any other cast as gujjar general of this republic force who fough Temur invasion was praised greatly for the extreme bravery which he displayed in battle field.
They had no selfish interest so their records are more geniune than anyother court historian records.
Jat history research is a relatively new area and it will crumble many age old false propogandas carried by vested interests such as leftist historians.