05-15-2006, 11:50 PM
As I pointed out how jats are related to Indus valley civilization in my post under marathi thread. We find presence of indus valley imprints in all the places assosiated with jats like tarim basin, afghanistan and Indus area.
Again we find mention in persian records as they fought with sassanid rulers.
Muslim historians such as bukhari a contemporary of prophet mention that these Indian jats has already established in arabia much before the birth of muhammad.If we assume it fourth century AD than they might have been living for many centuries before in India than only he can say these Indian jats.These Parthian rulers who ruled for nearly four centuries from second century BC to scond century ad always called them azats meaning leaders of aryans and noble man.Simlarly we find relations between India and iran through Indus valley and elamite artifacts,now if we just avoid latinization of names these parthians names looks no different from Indian names.
Further as we see armenian literatures it has clearly stated that azat or jats (just note the iranian z sound is replaced by Indian J sound)
term is used from noble leaders of aryans and is a derivative of yajats used for leaders of aryans in vedic literature
It looks most probable that some of these aryan leaders as Indra who is termed as yazat or jazat in vedic literature moved west ward (supported by a westward expansion from pamirs in genetic findings)and devoled a new vedic religion over a period of time from parent Hindu fertility and sammanic religion of shiva and durga and later on merged again in to Hindu religion on their return.
This model explains each and every controversy regarding AIT.
However on there return the aryans had coined word kshtriya or khatti ,hitti for leaders and are represented by Indian khatris of north west and athrvans just merged in to indian brahman main stream as sarswat brahmans.
It is supported by the closest genetic similarity of khatri and brahmins.
Traditions of assosiation with vedas by all khatris as guru nanak and clans as vedis
Traditions of interchange of brahman and khatri cast as we see in case of sindh ruler chach.
Except these khatri all ancient kshtriyas as gujjar parthihars look fake kshtriyas of foregin origin.
Again we find mention in persian records as they fought with sassanid rulers.
Muslim historians such as bukhari a contemporary of prophet mention that these Indian jats has already established in arabia much before the birth of muhammad.If we assume it fourth century AD than they might have been living for many centuries before in India than only he can say these Indian jats.These Parthian rulers who ruled for nearly four centuries from second century BC to scond century ad always called them azats meaning leaders of aryans and noble man.Simlarly we find relations between India and iran through Indus valley and elamite artifacts,now if we just avoid latinization of names these parthians names looks no different from Indian names.
Further as we see armenian literatures it has clearly stated that azat or jats (just note the iranian z sound is replaced by Indian J sound)
term is used from noble leaders of aryans and is a derivative of yajats used for leaders of aryans in vedic literature
It looks most probable that some of these aryan leaders as Indra who is termed as yazat or jazat in vedic literature moved west ward (supported by a westward expansion from pamirs in genetic findings)and devoled a new vedic religion over a period of time from parent Hindu fertility and sammanic religion of shiva and durga and later on merged again in to Hindu religion on their return.
This model explains each and every controversy regarding AIT.
However on there return the aryans had coined word kshtriya or khatti ,hitti for leaders and are represented by Indian khatris of north west and athrvans just merged in to indian brahman main stream as sarswat brahmans.
It is supported by the closest genetic similarity of khatri and brahmins.
Traditions of assosiation with vedas by all khatris as guru nanak and clans as vedis
Traditions of interchange of brahman and khatri cast as we see in case of sindh ruler chach.
Except these khatri all ancient kshtriyas as gujjar parthihars look fake kshtriyas of foregin origin.