05-31-2006, 05:22 AM
Is the concern about radicalization of muslims or their reversion to Islam?
If you look at the past 1400 years muslims have always pursued jihadi agenda in varying degrees depending on the circumstances. The current period in India resembles the back to Islam movements of the late 19th and the early 20th centuries especially in Bengal and UP.
Hindus have consistently found ways to avoid studying the tenets of Islam and invent multiple theories to explain away muslim behavior. Even in this thread hindus bring up issues like Shah Bano, UCC, etc. which are peripheral to the main problem of Islam itself. The seperate laws, the occupation of Hindu religious places like Ayodhya, outbreeding the hindu community are all the tactics of jihad. Remember, the ultimate goal of a jihadist is to convert our Hindustan (Dar-Ul-Harb) in to Mughalstan (Dar-Ul-Islam). Every member of the muslim community that pursues the goal with violence or otherwise (Dawa, financing, political opportunism, outbreeding the kafir) is a jihadi.
What hindus need to do is address the problem of Islam itself and the growth and presence of muslims in what is left of Hindu India.
The following three books should be a must read for every hindu:
Understanding Islam Through Hadis: Religious faith or Fanaticism? by Ram Swarup
http://www.voi.org/books/uith/
Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War by Suhas Majumdar
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/jihad/
The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims by Andew Bostom
Also, visit the following site to keep tabs on the day to day activities of jihadis:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
One more thing I need to add is that hindus need to be completely unapologetic about defending themselves against muslim agression. The secularists argument seems to be that in Gujarat more muslims died (~1000) that hindus (~250) and therefore muslims are the victims. But that is a flawed argument because the guilt or innocence is based solely on body count. By the same token one can argue that in 1971 war more pakis died (~10,000) than Indian jawans (~3000) therefore Pakistan must be the injured party. But we all know that if an aggressor suffers more during retaliation that does not abslove the agressor from the initial crime of starting the conflict.
Muslims kill hindus because their religion asks them to and hindus kill muslims to prevent them from doing so.
If you look at the past 1400 years muslims have always pursued jihadi agenda in varying degrees depending on the circumstances. The current period in India resembles the back to Islam movements of the late 19th and the early 20th centuries especially in Bengal and UP.
Hindus have consistently found ways to avoid studying the tenets of Islam and invent multiple theories to explain away muslim behavior. Even in this thread hindus bring up issues like Shah Bano, UCC, etc. which are peripheral to the main problem of Islam itself. The seperate laws, the occupation of Hindu religious places like Ayodhya, outbreeding the hindu community are all the tactics of jihad. Remember, the ultimate goal of a jihadist is to convert our Hindustan (Dar-Ul-Harb) in to Mughalstan (Dar-Ul-Islam). Every member of the muslim community that pursues the goal with violence or otherwise (Dawa, financing, political opportunism, outbreeding the kafir) is a jihadi.
What hindus need to do is address the problem of Islam itself and the growth and presence of muslims in what is left of Hindu India.
The following three books should be a must read for every hindu:
Understanding Islam Through Hadis: Religious faith or Fanaticism? by Ram Swarup
http://www.voi.org/books/uith/
Jihad: The Islamic Doctrine of Permanent War by Suhas Majumdar
http://voiceofdharma.org/books/jihad/
The Legacy of Jihad: Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims by Andew Bostom
Also, visit the following site to keep tabs on the day to day activities of jihadis:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/
One more thing I need to add is that hindus need to be completely unapologetic about defending themselves against muslim agression. The secularists argument seems to be that in Gujarat more muslims died (~1000) that hindus (~250) and therefore muslims are the victims. But that is a flawed argument because the guilt or innocence is based solely on body count. By the same token one can argue that in 1971 war more pakis died (~10,000) than Indian jawans (~3000) therefore Pakistan must be the injured party. But we all know that if an aggressor suffers more during retaliation that does not abslove the agressor from the initial crime of starting the conflict.
Muslims kill hindus because their religion asks them to and hindus kill muslims to prevent them from doing so.