06-01-2006, 06:00 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-ben_ami+May 31 2006, 11:35 PM-->QUOTE(ben_ami @ May 31 2006, 11:35 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-G.Subramaniam+May 31 2006, 08:25 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(G.Subramaniam @ May 31 2006, 08:25 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
<!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
a question -
why is dravidianism dericted against the brahims ??? why not against non-dravidians??
(i mean any "ims" is directed against its antithesis - south africa's apartheid regime by whites was directed against NON-whites)
arnt tamil brahmins like say vishy anand and radha krishnan as much dravidian as the non brahimns of tamil nadu??
or does the DMK believe that brahimns of tamil nadu are not dravidian and only the non brahins are ??
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Historically in tamil nadu, power went from the tamil kingdoms to muslims in 1330 and rescued by Telegu speaking Vijayanagar in 1370, to british rule in 1750
Per the false history of the dravidianists, the tamils lost power to the invading aryan brahmins
Brahmins are mentioned in the earliest tamil epics and have a long history in tamil nadu
Per the dravidianists. muslims are dravidians and eligigle for OBC reservations
Per the dravidianists, xtians are dravidians and eligible for OBC reservations
Per the dravidians, the Saurashtrian community ( a recently immigrant weaver caste from Gujurat who claimed to be brahmins ) are OBC and eligible for reservations
Per the dravidianists, kannada speaking migrant EVR, telegu speaking migrant Karunanidhi, malayalam speaking migrant MGR are all dravidian natives
Whereas the tamil brahmin with a 2000 year history in the land is the aryan invader
Everyone except the brahmin is a dravidian
[right][snapback]51914[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo--> a question -
why is dravidianism dericted against the brahims ??? why not against non-dravidians??
(i mean any "ims" is directed against its antithesis - south africa's apartheid regime by whites was directed against NON-whites)
arnt tamil brahmins like say vishy anand and radha krishnan as much dravidian as the non brahimns of tamil nadu??
or does the DMK believe that brahimns of tamil nadu are not dravidian and only the non brahins are ??
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Historically in tamil nadu, power went from the tamil kingdoms to muslims in 1330 and rescued by Telegu speaking Vijayanagar in 1370, to british rule in 1750
Per the false history of the dravidianists, the tamils lost power to the invading aryan brahmins
Brahmins are mentioned in the earliest tamil epics and have a long history in tamil nadu
Per the dravidianists. muslims are dravidians and eligigle for OBC reservations
Per the dravidianists, xtians are dravidians and eligible for OBC reservations
Per the dravidians, the Saurashtrian community ( a recently immigrant weaver caste from Gujurat who claimed to be brahmins ) are OBC and eligible for reservations
Per the dravidianists, kannada speaking migrant EVR, telegu speaking migrant Karunanidhi, malayalam speaking migrant MGR are all dravidian natives
Whereas the tamil brahmin with a 2000 year history in the land is the aryan invader
Everyone except the brahmin is a dravidian
[right][snapback]51914[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->