07-13-2006, 03:37 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-jayshastri+Jul 12 2006, 02:09 AM-->QUOTE(jayshastri @ Jul 12 2006, 02:09 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-Sattva+Jul 12 2006, 12:29 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Sattva @ Jul 12 2006, 12:29 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-jayshastri+Jul 11 2006, 11:47 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(jayshastri @ Jul 11 2006, 11:47 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->i wonder how thrill would the terrorist be on reading this. they probably just wanted to kill us by their attacks, now they are having us grabing at each others throats. what a bonus for them,
[right][snapback]53461[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well its not as if the Gandhians would pose any sort of threat to the Muslims to begin with;[right][snapback]53467[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
On the contrary. Think really really hard, read books, than think again. you will know what i mean by 'on the contrary'. The reason why jinha wanted pakistan... Those who would get what i am saying would feel very very happy.
[right][snapback]53485[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The reason why Jinnah wanted Pakistan was, on the personal level, the satisfaction of his own ego needs for power. The reason other Muslims wanted Pakistan was naturally, it was a cut into a Kaffir nation (although Partition actually probably helped Hindus more since it boosted their numbers percentage wise within India). And if Gandhi 'on the contrary' really did pose a threat to the aforementioned Jinnah, then how come partition came to fruition. Why did Pakistan emerge when Gandhi long was against it? Some threat.
Now, you may not have understood my initial comments. To explain, I was responding to your statement that 'we' are at each others throats. The first thing I thought was that a Gandhian would never be at another persons throat, even figuratively, since that would constitute himsa. Gandhians are supposed to sit back and let others have their way with you, at least that is the ideal. Secondly, if you are to read Gandhi's philosophy, you would wonder how he could have been a threat to Muslims when he was saying.... the guy was the best ally a Muslim could dream of!
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>
Hindus should not harbor anger in their hearts against Muslims even if the latter wanted to destroy them. Even if the Muslims want to kill us all we should face death bravely. If they established their rule after killing Hindus we would be ushering in a new world by sacrificing our lives.
</span>
If Hindus actually did what Gandhi said, Muslims would have had little work to do!
[right][snapback]53461[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Well its not as if the Gandhians would pose any sort of threat to the Muslims to begin with;[right][snapback]53467[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
On the contrary. Think really really hard, read books, than think again. you will know what i mean by 'on the contrary'. The reason why jinha wanted pakistan... Those who would get what i am saying would feel very very happy.
[right][snapback]53485[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
The reason why Jinnah wanted Pakistan was, on the personal level, the satisfaction of his own ego needs for power. The reason other Muslims wanted Pakistan was naturally, it was a cut into a Kaffir nation (although Partition actually probably helped Hindus more since it boosted their numbers percentage wise within India). And if Gandhi 'on the contrary' really did pose a threat to the aforementioned Jinnah, then how come partition came to fruition. Why did Pakistan emerge when Gandhi long was against it? Some threat.
Now, you may not have understood my initial comments. To explain, I was responding to your statement that 'we' are at each others throats. The first thing I thought was that a Gandhian would never be at another persons throat, even figuratively, since that would constitute himsa. Gandhians are supposed to sit back and let others have their way with you, at least that is the ideal. Secondly, if you are to read Gandhi's philosophy, you would wonder how he could have been a threat to Muslims when he was saying.... the guy was the best ally a Muslim could dream of!
<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>
Hindus should not harbor anger in their hearts against Muslims even if the latter wanted to destroy them. Even if the Muslims want to kill us all we should face death bravely. If they established their rule after killing Hindus we would be ushering in a new world by sacrificing our lives.
</span>
If Hindus actually did what Gandhi said, Muslims would have had little work to do!