07-27-2006, 10:21 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Jul 27 2006, 02:59 AM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Jul 27 2006, 02:59 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->THis is a linguistic question. This thread is only for unmasking AIT.
Please put it in the linguistic thread. Philology and linguistics are not exact science and the tradition and precedence of 100 years is still carried out in the linguistic community.
[right][snapback]54648[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
true that mine is specifically a linguistic question.
but the AIT or its alternative has to explain a lot of things, linguistic or otherwise.
the horse thingie, the "sea" in the vedas, the real date of the writing of the vedas etc etc.
the linquistic part is also one of the main points that needs be resolved, along wit genetics based arguements, archeology based arguements etc etc. cant leave ANY loose strings.
Please put it in the linguistic thread. Philology and linguistics are not exact science and the tradition and precedence of 100 years is still carried out in the linguistic community.
[right][snapback]54648[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
true that mine is specifically a linguistic question.
but the AIT or its alternative has to explain a lot of things, linguistic or otherwise.
the horse thingie, the "sea" in the vedas, the real date of the writing of the vedas etc etc.
the linquistic part is also one of the main points that needs be resolved, along wit genetics based arguements, archeology based arguements etc etc. cant leave ANY loose strings.