<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Jul 27 2006, 12:18 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Jul 27 2006, 12:18 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Sorry if I'm not being very clear or coherent, or if I've been repetitive.
[right][snapback]54693[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not at all, on the contrary. Thanks for the analysis. I still think we must study Philology and even disprove its present "rulebook" if needed. Remember - "Solution of a Problem is through it"?
Anyways dont you think we have got to follow Philology even to unearth the true evolution theory? like answering Sanskrit-Tamil-Eastern languages link. like answering howcome Greek-Sanskrit are having more similarities than Tamil-Sanskrit, and so on.
[right][snapback]54693[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Not at all, on the contrary. Thanks for the analysis. I still think we must study Philology and even disprove its present "rulebook" if needed. Remember - "Solution of a Problem is through it"?
Anyways dont you think we have got to follow Philology even to unearth the true evolution theory? like answering Sanskrit-Tamil-Eastern languages link. like answering howcome Greek-Sanskrit are having more similarities than Tamil-Sanskrit, and so on.