Unmasking AIT

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-acharya+Aug 1 2006, 10:42 PM-->QUOTE(acharya @ Aug 1 2006, 10:42 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->
My question is do Indian scholars really need to create another hypothesis or alternative  theory to disprove AIT?
[right][snapback]54963[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Acharya, it is like this. By now, all sane minded people should be convinced that AIT has too many loop holes for it to be true. Latest evidences are all against it. So as with all falsehood, AIT will also fall flat on its face in some time to come under its own weight (Satyamev Jayate).

Now the onus on Indian Scholars is to find out what the real truth is, of the evolution of the civilization of India, and come up with the strong hypothesis which would be able to answer all kinds of evidences and questions. Therefore the purpose of Indic scholars in finding out the real theory/hypothesis in not just in disproving AIT, but much beyond - finding the real truthful occurances of our civilization - and proving it with evidence.

Having said that - I am not suggesting that assault on AIT should stop in any ways. It must actually be accelerated - hand-in-hand with finding the alternative theory.

By the way supremacy questions - are irrelevant and unnecessary.