08-10-2006, 07:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Aug 10 2006, 06:03 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Aug 10 2006, 06:03 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->There is a difference between being Universal and being moronic, even among Hindus the different schools of thought (dvaita vs advaita) never accepted each other as true and always had debates among themselves, they didn't just mindlessly tell people that everything and anything is right and will lead to moksha.
[right][snapback]55354[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As long its about Parbrahm, the different thoughts and ways to achieve the Realization of Him is accepted and encouraged. Not everything leads to Moksha and then there is nothing and no one who can lead one to Moksha except Parbrahm. What does Upanishads say about Moksh and Who is to acqurie it And by whom and for what purpose. Folks looking for Moksh are to be considered doomed and pitied and so are their teachers.
A God realized being cannot be judged by a non realized ordinary living entity as it will like asking a skunk to be a judge of perfume selection. Let me ask if the poster/s r questioning the God relaization of Ramakrishna and on what ground?
What is referred as moronic? Pease explain.
[right][snapback]55354[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
As long its about Parbrahm, the different thoughts and ways to achieve the Realization of Him is accepted and encouraged. Not everything leads to Moksha and then there is nothing and no one who can lead one to Moksha except Parbrahm. What does Upanishads say about Moksh and Who is to acqurie it And by whom and for what purpose. Folks looking for Moksh are to be considered doomed and pitied and so are their teachers.
A God realized being cannot be judged by a non realized ordinary living entity as it will like asking a skunk to be a judge of perfume selection. Let me ask if the poster/s r questioning the God relaization of Ramakrishna and on what ground?
What is referred as moronic? Pease explain.