08-11-2006, 10:57 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Aug 11 2006, 08:13 AM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Aug 11 2006, 08:13 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Post 45 (Romani):<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->They show a limited tolerance for some mistery cults like Isis cult .Romans sack, destroy and desacrate celtic,decanian and phoenician temples. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->I suggest you investigate Roman history just a little bit deeper, beyond the Christo propaganda that states "Rome was not tolerant either". You will see why this most pluralistic nation banned certain religious 'cults'.
- The Romans did not like to see excessive sexual behaviour in public, self-flaggellation, etc. (Contrary to the Christian projection of Romans, the Romans had some quite strict social behaviour codes and were less promiscuous than BBC series like 'Rome' would have you believe. Yes, some were a bit over the top, but Roman society in general was not at all as mad as portrayed. Even the escapades of certain Roman emperors cannot compare to the quantity and excess of Byzantine Empresses - who of course were all Christians.)
It was because of Roman aversion to extreme behaviour in .
[right][snapback]55446[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ok ,what about god of war in the non-roman europeans ;you know celts,germans and other made war and human sacrifice in order to go in heaven .This war like behavior of europeans was pass down until colonial age.
Is no proof that christians have a destructive behavior before year 250.If so they didnt reach 10% of roman empire population by year 200 ,and 40% until year 300 before Constantine.
The evilness of Bisantine empire was and stil is just a western and catholic propaganda,in order to show how much west -europe was moral comparative whit the Orient.
Hmm all path lead to Moksha. I think most of of amerindians,africans,aztec etc dont even heard of Moksha.Not even taoist have this,they only try to live acording to nature laws, they dont use metaphysical concepts like Samadhi or Jina.
- The Romans did not like to see excessive sexual behaviour in public, self-flaggellation, etc. (Contrary to the Christian projection of Romans, the Romans had some quite strict social behaviour codes and were less promiscuous than BBC series like 'Rome' would have you believe. Yes, some were a bit over the top, but Roman society in general was not at all as mad as portrayed. Even the escapades of certain Roman emperors cannot compare to the quantity and excess of Byzantine Empresses - who of course were all Christians.)
It was because of Roman aversion to extreme behaviour in .
[right][snapback]55446[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Ok ,what about god of war in the non-roman europeans ;you know celts,germans and other made war and human sacrifice in order to go in heaven .This war like behavior of europeans was pass down until colonial age.
Is no proof that christians have a destructive behavior before year 250.If so they didnt reach 10% of roman empire population by year 200 ,and 40% until year 300 before Constantine.
The evilness of Bisantine empire was and stil is just a western and catholic propaganda,in order to show how much west -europe was moral comparative whit the Orient.
Hmm all path lead to Moksha. I think most of of amerindians,africans,aztec etc dont even heard of Moksha.Not even taoist have this,they only try to live acording to nature laws, they dont use metaphysical concepts like Samadhi or Jina.