08-15-2006, 12:18 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-prem+Aug 15 2006, 12:24 AM-->QUOTE(prem @ Aug 15 2006, 12:24 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> Singhi Kaya , can u please post the name of the author of above critique as well as the limitations/ boundaries of Rama and Krihsna and of the Snatan Dharma .
If Snatan Dharam is confined to boundaries, it shoud call itslef some other name as eternal cannot be limited by books,persons and personalities. I thonk the very quetsioning of Universlism in Snatan dharm is invalid and against its spirit of spritual enquiery thus making it equal to a 'sampardaya" or cult like Hare Krishna, Rajnesshims, Brahm Kumari etc..<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you are asking about the author of the article, it's in this current thread...go to the first page. You can see the original quote plus the link to his blog.
There is no real limitations of Rama and Krishna for they were God. Yet in their actions they strictly acted within the domains of dharma and did not embrace all parties in the field.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Communism, fascism and nazism are also creations of God. Are you willing to admit them within your boundaryless universalism (which you also consider as Sanatana Dharma)? If your reservation is they killed people, let me tell you Islam and Xainity killed and brutally tortured and raped far far more. And brutality is a part of Koranism since it's creation ~ there is no cleaver way except being a moron to bypass it.(a general comment, no directed to anyone)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There 2 aspects in this creation Sat and Asat (Gita Chapt 2). Sat is the real and eternal. Asat is the trancient. Sanatana Dharna is called Sanatan because it's rishi's many many mellinium ago found the true nature of existence in Sat and set up systems (not one) to establish the society and individuals in it. Sanatana is sanatan because it seeks the eternal truth (in real terms not words).
Universalism as I understand it is being ignorant of this distinction and taking everything under the sun which has the tag God (a man made word) attached to it to be same.
For example, the only reason why Koranism is a part of universalism and fascism is not is because Koranism claims to be the word of God.
So, the so called universal is just a word??!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If Snatan Dharam is confined to boundaries, it shoud call itslef some other name as eternal cannot be limited by books,persons and personalities. I thonk the very quetsioning of Universlism in Snatan dharm is invalid and against its spirit of spritual enquiery thus making it equal to a 'sampardaya" or cult like Hare Krishna, Rajnesshims, Brahm Kumari etc..<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
If you are asking about the author of the article, it's in this current thread...go to the first page. You can see the original quote plus the link to his blog.
There is no real limitations of Rama and Krishna for they were God. Yet in their actions they strictly acted within the domains of dharma and did not embrace all parties in the field.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Communism, fascism and nazism are also creations of God. Are you willing to admit them within your boundaryless universalism (which you also consider as Sanatana Dharma)? If your reservation is they killed people, let me tell you Islam and Xainity killed and brutally tortured and raped far far more. And brutality is a part of Koranism since it's creation ~ there is no cleaver way except being a moron to bypass it.(a general comment, no directed to anyone)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There 2 aspects in this creation Sat and Asat (Gita Chapt 2). Sat is the real and eternal. Asat is the trancient. Sanatana Dharna is called Sanatan because it's rishi's many many mellinium ago found the true nature of existence in Sat and set up systems (not one) to establish the society and individuals in it. Sanatana is sanatan because it seeks the eternal truth (in real terms not words).
Universalism as I understand it is being ignorant of this distinction and taking everything under the sun which has the tag God (a man made word) attached to it to be same.
For example, the only reason why Koranism is a part of universalism and fascism is not is because Koranism claims to be the word of God.
So, the so called universal is just a word??!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------