08-16-2006, 02:46 AM
[
Way of the Hindu is the truth and the goal (Atman) and not getting restricted by means.
[right][snapback]55660[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
And apply this to your arguments against RKP and his ways of teaching God.
He saw God in everything and evey thing was Godly for him because of His touch.
How could he live with boundaries ? A godly soul stuck in boundaries is contradiction in itself.
SInghi Kaya are we to accept Dr. Morales as a authority on God realized beings like RKP and VIvekananda? Has Morlaes seen God and experienced the Ultimate like the one he is questioning? The way of Snathan Dharam is not of the Islamic or semetic framework. Onlee the fanatic followers of egoistic (Humility , the first sign ripe soul) Prabupad or charltan ( no control over desires and Indriyas) Rajneesh or Sivanda (greedy) cultists etc will find solace in the exclusive fameworks proposed by supossed specialists. Snatani dont need to cut others down to show Snatan Dharma's greatness and all encompassing nature of Par-Brahm. The criticism of RKP is not onlee uncalled for but also asuric in nature with the potential of killing the spirit of enquiry regarding Divine thus making Snatan Dharma a theoratical one with dark dead end. Lets keep God as the centre point of SNatani and not a Book or Theory . Even Vedas has warned against this kind of threat.
Way of the Hindu is the truth and the goal (Atman) and not getting restricted by means.
[right][snapback]55660[/snapback][/right]
[/quote]
And apply this to your arguments against RKP and his ways of teaching God.
He saw God in everything and evey thing was Godly for him because of His touch.
How could he live with boundaries ? A godly soul stuck in boundaries is contradiction in itself.
SInghi Kaya are we to accept Dr. Morales as a authority on God realized beings like RKP and VIvekananda? Has Morlaes seen God and experienced the Ultimate like the one he is questioning? The way of Snathan Dharam is not of the Islamic or semetic framework. Onlee the fanatic followers of egoistic (Humility , the first sign ripe soul) Prabupad or charltan ( no control over desires and Indriyas) Rajneesh or Sivanda (greedy) cultists etc will find solace in the exclusive fameworks proposed by supossed specialists. Snatani dont need to cut others down to show Snatan Dharma's greatness and all encompassing nature of Par-Brahm. The criticism of RKP is not onlee uncalled for but also asuric in nature with the potential of killing the spirit of enquiry regarding Divine thus making Snatan Dharma a theoratical one with dark dead end. Lets keep God as the centre point of SNatani and not a Book or Theory . Even Vedas has warned against this kind of threat.