08-16-2006, 10:15 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Aug 16 2006, 09:14 PM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Aug 16 2006, 09:14 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let's face it, Hindus have nothing to apologise for that massacre even if Bukka did do it because he did it as retaliation for countless other massacres heaped on the Southern Hindus previous to that.
[right][snapback]55719[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks Bharatvarsh. My problem was not the mention that Bukka had liquidated muslims. The problem is that the incident is shown to be an act of agression rather than retaliation, and is shown as an instance to justify the retatliation of muslims. The one sided and false painting of the picture is the main issue.
[right][snapback]55719[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks Bharatvarsh. My problem was not the mention that Bukka had liquidated muslims. The problem is that the incident is shown to be an act of agression rather than retaliation, and is shown as an instance to justify the retatliation of muslims. The one sided and false painting of the picture is the main issue.