To add to Bharatvarsh's point, also look at the Sanga-Babur war from the Babar's point of view. 1) Babur does mention the fight against Sanga as Jihad against the hindus - so what if there were some muslims on the side of Rana Sanga for political reasons. 2) Were there any Hindus fighting on the side of Babur?
Also don't forget to take into consideration Guru Nanak's first hand account of Babur's invasion as recorded in Babarvani section of Sri Guru Grantha - particularly how Babar treated the people captured and cities that befell.
By the way is "bAbar" derived from "Barbar"? What does Babar otherwise mean in Turkish/Percian? also "Humayun"?
Also don't forget to take into consideration Guru Nanak's first hand account of Babur's invasion as recorded in Babarvani section of Sri Guru Grantha - particularly how Babar treated the people captured and cities that befell.
By the way is "bAbar" derived from "Barbar"? What does Babar otherwise mean in Turkish/Percian? also "Humayun"?