02-26-2004, 12:55 PM
This is very interesting. First of all the US arrogates to itself the right to judge another sovereign nation , a nation with which it has never been at war, a nation which has no territorial designs on america, and a nation which does not export drugs and narcotics to the US. Second, there is the question of whether it uses a uniform measuring stick when it sits in judgement over the KSA or TSP or Jordan which would surely fail the test which it so rigorously applies to India. Methinks this more an exercise in undermining the nationhood of India than it is (driven by) any altruistic concerns for the minorities of India.
Reports such as this , raise the fundamental question of WTF is the US to sit in judgement over India in the first place.
For the US, Indian democracy is 'flawed'
T V Parasuram in Washington | February 26, 2004 15:20 IST
The United States has surely touched a raw nerve.
'Long-standing, but flawed' is how it has described India's democracy, which it said has been dogged by allegations of corruption influencing court decisions, violence in some elections and restrictions on religious and academic freedom.
The state department, in its annual report released on Wednesday, said tension between Hindus on the one hand and Muslims and Christians on the other remained a challenge to India's secular formation.
The leading party in the government coalition, the report noted, is the BJP, 'a Hindu nationalist political party with links to Hindu extremist groups that were implicated in violent acts against Christians and Muslims'.
"However," it added, "the BJP is an independent political party and the degree of RSS influence over its policy-making was not clear."
Among India's shortcomings, the report listed police atrocities; atrocities by both government forces and militants, including foreign militants, in Kashmir and elsewhere and restrictions on religious and academic freedom.
In 71 closely typed pages, the report alleged that it was reported that members of the BJP, the RSS and other affiliated organisations 'harassed and at times threatened the use of violence against Christians and Muslims'.
"The BJP and RSS officially expressed respect and tolerance for other religions. However, the RSS in particular opposes conversions from Hinduism and believes that all citizens should adhere to Hindu cultural values. The BJP officially agrees that the caste system should be eliminated, but many of its members are ambivalent about this," the report said.
"Tension between Muslims and Hindus, and between Hindus and Christians continued to pose a challenge to the secular foundation of the State," it added.
It said Hindus had also been victims of violence and referred to the August 25 twin blasts in Mumbai in which 44 people were killed.
Some government officials, the report claimed, continued to advocate 'saffronising', or raising the profile of Hindu cultural norms and views in public education, which has prompted criticism from minority leaders, opposition politicians, academics and advocates of secular values.
The report particularly mentioned the Human Resources Development Ministry 'passing strict guidelines to regulate academic partnerships between Indian and Western universities in line with Hindutva philosophy'.
In Jammu and Kashmir, the Lashkar-e-Jabbar militant group required all Muslim women to wear a 'burqa' when in public or risk retribution and ordered Hindus and Sikhs in the Kashmir valley to wear identifying marks, the report said.
Intimidation by militant groups in Kashmir also caused significant self-censorship by journalists, it added.
Reports such as this , raise the fundamental question of WTF is the US to sit in judgement over India in the first place.
For the US, Indian democracy is 'flawed'
T V Parasuram in Washington | February 26, 2004 15:20 IST
The United States has surely touched a raw nerve.
'Long-standing, but flawed' is how it has described India's democracy, which it said has been dogged by allegations of corruption influencing court decisions, violence in some elections and restrictions on religious and academic freedom.
The state department, in its annual report released on Wednesday, said tension between Hindus on the one hand and Muslims and Christians on the other remained a challenge to India's secular formation.
The leading party in the government coalition, the report noted, is the BJP, 'a Hindu nationalist political party with links to Hindu extremist groups that were implicated in violent acts against Christians and Muslims'.
"However," it added, "the BJP is an independent political party and the degree of RSS influence over its policy-making was not clear."
Among India's shortcomings, the report listed police atrocities; atrocities by both government forces and militants, including foreign militants, in Kashmir and elsewhere and restrictions on religious and academic freedom.
In 71 closely typed pages, the report alleged that it was reported that members of the BJP, the RSS and other affiliated organisations 'harassed and at times threatened the use of violence against Christians and Muslims'.
"The BJP and RSS officially expressed respect and tolerance for other religions. However, the RSS in particular opposes conversions from Hinduism and believes that all citizens should adhere to Hindu cultural values. The BJP officially agrees that the caste system should be eliminated, but many of its members are ambivalent about this," the report said.
"Tension between Muslims and Hindus, and between Hindus and Christians continued to pose a challenge to the secular foundation of the State," it added.
It said Hindus had also been victims of violence and referred to the August 25 twin blasts in Mumbai in which 44 people were killed.
Some government officials, the report claimed, continued to advocate 'saffronising', or raising the profile of Hindu cultural norms and views in public education, which has prompted criticism from minority leaders, opposition politicians, academics and advocates of secular values.
The report particularly mentioned the Human Resources Development Ministry 'passing strict guidelines to regulate academic partnerships between Indian and Western universities in line with Hindutva philosophy'.
In Jammu and Kashmir, the Lashkar-e-Jabbar militant group required all Muslim women to wear a 'burqa' when in public or risk retribution and ordered Hindus and Sikhs in the Kashmir valley to wear identifying marks, the report said.
Intimidation by militant groups in Kashmir also caused significant self-censorship by journalists, it added.