08-28-2006, 10:44 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->As you read the article yourself do you doubt its authencity?
Important point was Balhara clan of jats considered greatest in India ruled for many generation but overlookked in history.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Tell me the name of this Balhara King. Why is it so difficult? Unless I see a real
name then the claim is a little tenous at best.
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->What I want is immaterial what is important is truth about antiquity of rajputs .who were they?I have given so many references regarding your ancestory from your own rajput sites but you are just not ready to admit without giving any substantiating reason.
Just tell me Are the rajputs delibrately spreading lies about their own origin?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Looks like a case of not believing what you do not like. Please explain why is
that rajput women not work in the fields and Jats and rest of the other kshatriyas do?
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Now who so ever was these Huns they are absorbed in Indian society and should be treated as Indian.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do you know for how long they grabbed a small piece of land in India?
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->I feel I have said what I wanted to say further repeating same thing won't serve any purpose.
If you still feel that you have nothing to do with these groups than I am really happy for you.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When you go into a debate you either have to convince or be convinced. Running away
from it serves no purpose. At the same time there should be no prejudice. Some Jats
have made up there mind that Jats were forefathers of rajputs which is absurd.
You have no data to prove such a claim. They only thing you have is both groups have
similar last names and hence must be the same. This idea has been refuted in previous
posts. Why do you still cling to it?
-Digvijay
Important point was Balhara clan of jats considered greatest in India ruled for many generation but overlookked in history.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Tell me the name of this Balhara King. Why is it so difficult? Unless I see a real
name then the claim is a little tenous at best.
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->What I want is immaterial what is important is truth about antiquity of rajputs .who were they?I have given so many references regarding your ancestory from your own rajput sites but you are just not ready to admit without giving any substantiating reason.
Just tell me Are the rajputs delibrately spreading lies about their own origin?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Looks like a case of not believing what you do not like. Please explain why is
that rajput women not work in the fields and Jats and rest of the other kshatriyas do?
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Now who so ever was these Huns they are absorbed in Indian society and should be treated as Indian.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do you know for how long they grabbed a small piece of land in India?
<!--QuoteBegin-NANDIBUM+Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM-->QUOTE(NANDIBUM @ Aug 28 2006, 01:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->I feel I have said what I wanted to say further repeating same thing won't serve any purpose.
If you still feel that you have nothing to do with these groups than I am really happy for you.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
When you go into a debate you either have to convince or be convinced. Running away
from it serves no purpose. At the same time there should be no prejudice. Some Jats
have made up there mind that Jats were forefathers of rajputs which is absurd.
You have no data to prove such a claim. They only thing you have is both groups have
similar last names and hence must be the same. This idea has been refuted in previous
posts. Why do you still cling to it?
-Digvijay