08-28-2006, 09:08 PM
I don't want to say a thing that I don't know .
The travellers accounts don't say anything about the name of Balhara King, but what is fact is narrations are fairly accurate as per todays evidences also.
The Balhara rulers were reported to be ruling earlier also in dahir times and was recorded in his fight with balharas.This testify travellers assertion that they were ruling for many generations.
Balhara clan is only found in JATS not in any other group.
Sindh was a having a sizable jat population till today from earliest period in history.
Are these facts not sufficient to assertain the group identity ?
The travellers accounts don't say anything about the name of Balhara King, but what is fact is narrations are fairly accurate as per todays evidences also.
The Balhara rulers were reported to be ruling earlier also in dahir times and was recorded in his fight with balharas.This testify travellers assertion that they were ruling for many generations.
Balhara clan is only found in JATS not in any other group.
Sindh was a having a sizable jat population till today from earliest period in history.
Are these facts not sufficient to assertain the group identity ?