08-31-2006, 12:12 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Capt Manmohan Kumar+Aug 30 2006, 10:52 PM-->QUOTE(Capt Manmohan Kumar @ Aug 30 2006, 10:52 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Captain Kumar
Thank you for your contribution, and attempts to mollify people.
This is not about mollification or âtu tu men menâ
It is about using fabricated evidence to paint a false picture of History.
We have here a person who has been going hammer and tongs to advance his point of View (POV). We also have few others who have been supporting him or before his arrival indulging in denigrating Jats or treating their history as fiction.
This posterâs view is based, we find, on fabricated evidence.
This has been pointed out the person. The person is now trying to sidetrack the conversation .
What we have here is a deeper question.
The question is about the fabrication of history, to show certain groups is a positive light and denigrate others.
Certain groups have used these fabrications to advance their cause.
Here we have just shown one case . The case is no different that the California school text books showing Hindus in a poor light or the AIT proponents, showing that Bharat was invaded by Blonde Nordics driving chariots, bring culture and language into the Indian subcontinent from Europe.
And we should deal with it, not allow them to get away with their agenda.
At any rate, please do forgive me, but I will ask to hold your comments until this Digivijay use of fabricated evidence has been dealt with
Very best Regards
Ravi Chaudhary
PS I take it you are an armed forces person.
If you are also a history buff, you may be interested in reading the online book
The TigerTriumps.doc
Complete On Line Book- The Tiger Triumps- 4th, 8th, 10th Indian Div- WWII
It is in the files section of the jathistory group.
Best regards,
.
Captain Kumar
Thank you for your contribution, and attempts to mollify people.
This is not about mollification or âtu tu men menâ
It is about using fabricated evidence to paint a false picture of History.
We have here a person who has been going hammer and tongs to advance his point of View (POV). We also have few others who have been supporting him or before his arrival indulging in denigrating Jats or treating their history as fiction.
This posterâs view is based, we find, on fabricated evidence.
This has been pointed out the person. The person is now trying to sidetrack the conversation .
What we have here is a deeper question.
The question is about the fabrication of history, to show certain groups is a positive light and denigrate others.
Certain groups have used these fabrications to advance their cause.
Here we have just shown one case . The case is no different that the California school text books showing Hindus in a poor light or the AIT proponents, showing that Bharat was invaded by Blonde Nordics driving chariots, bring culture and language into the Indian subcontinent from Europe.
And we should deal with it, not allow them to get away with their agenda.
At any rate, please do forgive me, but I will ask to hold your comments until this Digivijay use of fabricated evidence has been dealt with
Very best Regards
Ravi Chaudhary
PS I take it you are an armed forces person.
If you are also a history buff, you may be interested in reading the online book
The TigerTriumps.doc
Complete On Line Book- The Tiger Triumps- 4th, 8th, 10th Indian Div- WWII
It is in the files section of the jathistory group.
Best regards,
.