08-31-2006, 07:06 PM
<span style='color:red'>No Ban On Arab News Chanels in India</span>
Indian broadcast laws as an anti-Arab 'conspiracy'
Wed, 2006-08-30 03:52
P.R. Kumaraswamy
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/1768
Earlier this month, an Arab daily published from Saudi Arabia charged that India has banned "Arab TV channels under pressure from Israel." Citing Saudi businesswoman who was unable to watch her favourite Arab channels during a visit to Mumbai, the Arab News charged that New Delhi "has succumbed to mounting Israeli pressure and ordered a nationwide ban on the broadcast of Arab television channels."
According to the daily, unnamed sources "within the government" described the move as an exercise "to browbeat Arabs and show them as terrorists. The government is subscribing to the absurd arguments that channels like Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya promote hatred and encourage terrorism."
<span style='color:red'>In its assessment, this unfriendliness towards the Arabs was in contrast to past Indian policies under Mrs. Indira Gandhi. It viewed the âbanâ as a sad reflection of Indiaâs democracy. </span>
This allegation was quickly picked up sections of India as it fitted fits well within the ideological worldview of the Indian Left. <span style='color:red'>The Communist Party of India condemned "the ban on Arab TV stations, while allowing all other channels which support Israelâs aggression and horrendous acts of bombing." </span>Describing it an "unfriendly move", it called on the government to lift the ban.
However, as it turned out, there was no ban. Less than 24 hours after the story first broke, the union government, through the junior Foreign Minister E Ahmad, denied any ban against Arab TV channels. He attributed the âdisappearanceâ of the Arab channels to their failure to confirm to the new down linking guidelines that were issued last November.
In a subsequent statement in the Lok Sabha, Information and Broadcasting Minister Priyaranjan Dasmunsi declared that all channels that had failed to conform to the new guidelines were taken off air. Describing the row as "a malicious and baseless accusation against the government by interested quarters", he disclosed that these Arab TV networks "had not applied to be down linked in India" while as many as 65 channels from abroad applied for the same.
Even if one ignores the technical and legal issues, one can not ignore the commercial angle. The extend of Arabic knowledge in India is still marginal. A vast majority of the Indian Muslims who recite Quran in its original are not well-versed in Arabic. Their recitation of the holy book should not be seen as a proof of their Arabic knowledge. In other words, if one does not watch mandarin channels in Saudi Arabia, it was not because Riyadh is anti-Chinese but because it is commercially less viable.
Two, the speed with which the Left embraced the unverified allegations also indicated the prevailing political climate in India. In recent years, the Middle East has become a highly charged foreign policy issue in India. It has become politically correct and publicly popular to join the anti-Americanism. This is most apparent in the public reactions in India to situations such as Iranian nuclear controversy, Iraqi quagmire and the Lebanese crisis. They are largely due to narrow domestic calculations, pressures from the Left, ideological blindness, partisan politic, lopsided Indian understanding of the Middle East complexities. For the vocal segment of the Indian intellectuals, it is fashionable again to be anti-Israeli.
Three, not many Indian know that Al-Jazeera is not banned in Israel but is available through the cable networks. For long, Israel also had regular correspondents and journalists from the Qatar-based news channel that has been regularly critical of Israel. If the channel is available to its citizens, it becomes illogical for Israel to seek its banning in other parts of the world, including India.
On the contrary, many Arab states including Saudi Arabia from where Arab News is published, has banned any media contacts with Israel. Arab and Muslim journalists who visit or make professional contacts with Israeli leaders are regularly condemned, isolated and even threatened physically. In countries such as Egypt and Jordan, national press associations act against their members who visit the Jewish State.
Four, Al-Jazeera has another interesting angle. Despite public criticisms, an Israeli mission functions from the Qatari capital. In July this year, Israel went to the extent of officially naming Roâi Rosenblit as the head of its mission in Doha. In short, the hostilities of the al-Jazeera broadcast did not prevent Israel from seeking, maintaining and even publicizing its relations with Qatar. On the contrary, such a situation offers an additional incentive for Israel to court that Arab country.
Five, the row underscores a much larger problem. Over the years, the Middle East has become a harbinger of conspiracy theories. Unable to find logical explanations for global events, a vast majority of Middle Eastern leaders, commentators and ordinary public have imbibed conspiracy theories. It is often easier to embrace a conspiracy than to look for hard and often uncomfortable answers.
Indeed for years Pakistan charged that there was an Indo-Israeli conspiracy against the larger Islamic world. Gradually sections of Egyptian media joined the chorus and accused that New Delhi exploded some Israeli devises during the nuclear tests India conducted in May 1998. Now the Indian broadcasting laws are seen as an anti-Arab conspiracy. Instead of looking at the non-compliance by Arab TV channels, people have argued that India has adopted an anti-Israeli policy due to Israeli and American pressures.
So, it is not surprising that the Arab News, did not carry the official Indian rebuttal.
P R Kumaraswamy teaches at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi
Indian broadcast laws as an anti-Arab 'conspiracy'
Wed, 2006-08-30 03:52
P.R. Kumaraswamy
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/1768
Earlier this month, an Arab daily published from Saudi Arabia charged that India has banned "Arab TV channels under pressure from Israel." Citing Saudi businesswoman who was unable to watch her favourite Arab channels during a visit to Mumbai, the Arab News charged that New Delhi "has succumbed to mounting Israeli pressure and ordered a nationwide ban on the broadcast of Arab television channels."
According to the daily, unnamed sources "within the government" described the move as an exercise "to browbeat Arabs and show them as terrorists. The government is subscribing to the absurd arguments that channels like Al-Jazeera and Al-Arabiya promote hatred and encourage terrorism."
<span style='color:red'>In its assessment, this unfriendliness towards the Arabs was in contrast to past Indian policies under Mrs. Indira Gandhi. It viewed the âbanâ as a sad reflection of Indiaâs democracy. </span>
This allegation was quickly picked up sections of India as it fitted fits well within the ideological worldview of the Indian Left. <span style='color:red'>The Communist Party of India condemned "the ban on Arab TV stations, while allowing all other channels which support Israelâs aggression and horrendous acts of bombing." </span>Describing it an "unfriendly move", it called on the government to lift the ban.
However, as it turned out, there was no ban. Less than 24 hours after the story first broke, the union government, through the junior Foreign Minister E Ahmad, denied any ban against Arab TV channels. He attributed the âdisappearanceâ of the Arab channels to their failure to confirm to the new down linking guidelines that were issued last November.
In a subsequent statement in the Lok Sabha, Information and Broadcasting Minister Priyaranjan Dasmunsi declared that all channels that had failed to conform to the new guidelines were taken off air. Describing the row as "a malicious and baseless accusation against the government by interested quarters", he disclosed that these Arab TV networks "had not applied to be down linked in India" while as many as 65 channels from abroad applied for the same.
Even if one ignores the technical and legal issues, one can not ignore the commercial angle. The extend of Arabic knowledge in India is still marginal. A vast majority of the Indian Muslims who recite Quran in its original are not well-versed in Arabic. Their recitation of the holy book should not be seen as a proof of their Arabic knowledge. In other words, if one does not watch mandarin channels in Saudi Arabia, it was not because Riyadh is anti-Chinese but because it is commercially less viable.
Two, the speed with which the Left embraced the unverified allegations also indicated the prevailing political climate in India. In recent years, the Middle East has become a highly charged foreign policy issue in India. It has become politically correct and publicly popular to join the anti-Americanism. This is most apparent in the public reactions in India to situations such as Iranian nuclear controversy, Iraqi quagmire and the Lebanese crisis. They are largely due to narrow domestic calculations, pressures from the Left, ideological blindness, partisan politic, lopsided Indian understanding of the Middle East complexities. For the vocal segment of the Indian intellectuals, it is fashionable again to be anti-Israeli.
Three, not many Indian know that Al-Jazeera is not banned in Israel but is available through the cable networks. For long, Israel also had regular correspondents and journalists from the Qatar-based news channel that has been regularly critical of Israel. If the channel is available to its citizens, it becomes illogical for Israel to seek its banning in other parts of the world, including India.
On the contrary, many Arab states including Saudi Arabia from where Arab News is published, has banned any media contacts with Israel. Arab and Muslim journalists who visit or make professional contacts with Israeli leaders are regularly condemned, isolated and even threatened physically. In countries such as Egypt and Jordan, national press associations act against their members who visit the Jewish State.
Four, Al-Jazeera has another interesting angle. Despite public criticisms, an Israeli mission functions from the Qatari capital. In July this year, Israel went to the extent of officially naming Roâi Rosenblit as the head of its mission in Doha. In short, the hostilities of the al-Jazeera broadcast did not prevent Israel from seeking, maintaining and even publicizing its relations with Qatar. On the contrary, such a situation offers an additional incentive for Israel to court that Arab country.
Five, the row underscores a much larger problem. Over the years, the Middle East has become a harbinger of conspiracy theories. Unable to find logical explanations for global events, a vast majority of Middle Eastern leaders, commentators and ordinary public have imbibed conspiracy theories. It is often easier to embrace a conspiracy than to look for hard and often uncomfortable answers.
Indeed for years Pakistan charged that there was an Indo-Israeli conspiracy against the larger Islamic world. Gradually sections of Egyptian media joined the chorus and accused that New Delhi exploded some Israeli devises during the nuclear tests India conducted in May 1998. Now the Indian broadcasting laws are seen as an anti-Arab conspiracy. Instead of looking at the non-compliance by Arab TV channels, people have argued that India has adopted an anti-Israeli policy due to Israeli and American pressures.
So, it is not surprising that the Arab News, did not carry the official Indian rebuttal.
P R Kumaraswamy teaches at Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi