10-12-2006, 03:36 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Capt Manmohan Kumar+Oct 12 2006, 06:57 AM-->QUOTE(Capt Manmohan Kumar @ Oct 12 2006, 06:57 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--emo&:clapping--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/clap.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='clap.gif' /><!--endemo--> the only thing i give gandhi credit for is the social reforms he suggested, the gram panchayat he advocated and for what he did for the backward castes.
That's what is known as win win situation i.e. u increase ur strength by putting ++ together rather than decrease ur strngth by including --.
1 of the gr8est strength of Gandhi was that as to how he brought the masses together to fight for National Freedom Movement. Otherwise, city fols had become too cozy w/ Brits.
Well, if Netaji won against the protege of Gandhi; that speaks volumes for democratic set up. And don't forget Nehru was the won who championed Netaji's defense in courts.
RE: Army
India is 1 'coz of Army. Army has got job to do. Praising Gandhi does not take out anything out of the job.
[right][snapback]58946[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
sorry but you are a confused hogwashed ex-army man.
nehru's greatest piece of spinelessness was when he donned the lawyer's clothes to defend the same Netaji he helped to get out of the equation. He did that just to appear a hero to the people who were opposing the trial of INA veterans, not for any special love he had for Netaji.
And if Netaji won against Gndhi's protege, it shows just how popular and powerful Netaji was. And that Gandhi went on a hunger strike, shows how much of a spineless spoiltsport he was.
Indian army and the indian civil servant brigade are the 2 weapons that the Gandhi-nehru dynasty uses in holding india together and and keeping the terrible secret of the way Nehru usurped the throne in delhi, a big secret from the people.
Nehru and Netaji are the worst and best sons of India respectively.
Of yeah, gandhi achieved nothing in the freedom movement, except delay our independence by a good 5-10 years and get millions of indians to die fighting for england. No indian was more cozy with the brits as well as the muslims than gandhi.
That's what is known as win win situation i.e. u increase ur strength by putting ++ together rather than decrease ur strngth by including --.
1 of the gr8est strength of Gandhi was that as to how he brought the masses together to fight for National Freedom Movement. Otherwise, city fols had become too cozy w/ Brits.
Well, if Netaji won against the protege of Gandhi; that speaks volumes for democratic set up. And don't forget Nehru was the won who championed Netaji's defense in courts.
RE: Army
India is 1 'coz of Army. Army has got job to do. Praising Gandhi does not take out anything out of the job.
[right][snapback]58946[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
sorry but you are a confused hogwashed ex-army man.
nehru's greatest piece of spinelessness was when he donned the lawyer's clothes to defend the same Netaji he helped to get out of the equation. He did that just to appear a hero to the people who were opposing the trial of INA veterans, not for any special love he had for Netaji.
And if Netaji won against Gndhi's protege, it shows just how popular and powerful Netaji was. And that Gandhi went on a hunger strike, shows how much of a spineless spoiltsport he was.
Indian army and the indian civil servant brigade are the 2 weapons that the Gandhi-nehru dynasty uses in holding india together and and keeping the terrible secret of the way Nehru usurped the throne in delhi, a big secret from the people.
Nehru and Netaji are the worst and best sons of India respectively.
Of yeah, gandhi achieved nothing in the freedom movement, except delay our independence by a good 5-10 years and get millions of indians to die fighting for england. No indian was more cozy with the brits as well as the muslims than gandhi.