<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->--- In IndiaArchaeology@yahoogroups.com, "mkelkar2003"
...> wrote:
>
> <http://www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk/genetics/iceage.pdf#search=%22forster%
> 20toth%22>
>
<b>A number of things don't look right in the study's maps. </b>For example,
the maps seem to show East Asian M originating from West Asia and
moving across Central Asia rather than the more likely origin in South
Asia moving east into Southeast Asia. They also seem to show R
originating in West Asia, when it should rather be further East again
possibly in South Asia.
Regards,
Paul Kekai Manansala
Quests of the Dragon and Bird Clan
http://www.lulu.com/content/448793<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, I am sure these are all innocent mistakes. While taking Oppenheimer into false confidence, the purpose of this paper seems to be to inconspicuously shift JT as far northwest-ward as possible. in fact all the lines have been shifted westwards and northwards. even so, they can only take JT as far as the caspian region. The branching point of JT is the Persian interior around zagros/baluchistan and the origin is Indus vallley.
THe other problem is that geneticists consistetly seem to take emigrant haplos from India which establish themselves in the "West Eurasia" to be indigeneous West eurasian, and then they wonder why M is restricted to South asia. as noted before, N haplos dominate "West Eurasia" only b/c of their late entry into the region. even so, R daughters in West Asia are india's N contribution to West asia.
Phylogeny of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup N in India, Based on Complete Sequencing: Implications for the Peopling of South Asia link
see the image:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender...Gv75p966fg2.jpg
...> wrote:
>
> <http://www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk/genetics/iceage.pdf#search=%22forster%
> 20toth%22>
>
<b>A number of things don't look right in the study's maps. </b>For example,
the maps seem to show East Asian M originating from West Asia and
moving across Central Asia rather than the more likely origin in South
Asia moving east into Southeast Asia. They also seem to show R
originating in West Asia, when it should rather be further East again
possibly in South Asia.
Regards,
Paul Kekai Manansala
Quests of the Dragon and Bird Clan
http://www.lulu.com/content/448793<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes, I am sure these are all innocent mistakes. While taking Oppenheimer into false confidence, the purpose of this paper seems to be to inconspicuously shift JT as far northwest-ward as possible. in fact all the lines have been shifted westwards and northwards. even so, they can only take JT as far as the caspian region. The branching point of JT is the Persian interior around zagros/baluchistan and the origin is Indus vallley.
THe other problem is that geneticists consistetly seem to take emigrant haplos from India which establish themselves in the "West Eurasia" to be indigeneous West eurasian, and then they wonder why M is restricted to South asia. as noted before, N haplos dominate "West Eurasia" only b/c of their late entry into the region. even so, R daughters in West Asia are india's N contribution to West asia.
Phylogeny of Mitochondrial DNA Macrohaplogroup N in India, Based on Complete Sequencing: Implications for the Peopling of South Asia link
see the image:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender...Gv75p966fg2.jpg