10-30-2006, 06:16 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Nice try but wont work. Backup claims below..<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
BharatVarsh has backed it up quite nicely. What more evidence do you need than the words of one of the founding fathers of VHP? Even Husky has admitted that sikh and neo-buddhist and in some cases, jains are spreading malicious propaganda against hindus. Yet, you want me to prove what you've already accepted. <!--emo&<_<--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='dry.gif' /><!--endemo-->
And I still stand by my statement: you made the claim that sikhs/jains/buddhists are allies of hindus, so the onus is on you to prove it.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->or you will end up where all pakis end up on India-Forum. Its THAT simple.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Famous words of those who can't reason. Amazingly enough, you'd rather ban a fellow hindu, than admit that non-hindus like sikhs/jains/buddhists are NOT on our side. A typical hindu, as Vivekananda alleged, would rather favor a non-hindu over a hindu, is that it? Why am I not surprised? <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
BharatVarsh has backed it up quite nicely. What more evidence do you need than the words of one of the founding fathers of VHP? Even Husky has admitted that sikh and neo-buddhist and in some cases, jains are spreading malicious propaganda against hindus. Yet, you want me to prove what you've already accepted. <!--emo&<_<--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dry.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='dry.gif' /><!--endemo-->
And I still stand by my statement: you made the claim that sikhs/jains/buddhists are allies of hindus, so the onus is on you to prove it.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->or you will end up where all pakis end up on India-Forum. Its THAT simple.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Famous words of those who can't reason. Amazingly enough, you'd rather ban a fellow hindu, than admit that non-hindus like sikhs/jains/buddhists are NOT on our side. A typical hindu, as Vivekananda alleged, would rather favor a non-hindu over a hindu, is that it? Why am I not surprised? <!--emo&
--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /><!--endemo-->
