10-22-2006, 11:05 PM
Here goes India's credibility and another example of Moron Singh's moroness.
<b>Mumbai blasts: 'Evidence against ISI not clinching'</b> <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->India has "pretty good" but probably not "clinching" evidence of the involvement of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in the Mumbai train blasts of July 11, National Security Adviser MK Narayanan has said.
<b>âI would hesitate to say we have clinching evidence but we have pretty good evidence,â </b>Narayanan said on the programme Devil's Advocate on the newschannel CNN-IBN. This is the first time any Indian official has spoken about the quality of the evidence against the Pakistani spy agency's role in the Mumbai blasts.
"I think it is as good evidence as we can possibly get in terrorist cases," said Narayanan. <b>"Whether it is clinching, is for the courts (to decide). We have connectivity, linkages, confessions. We have a number of arrests which are pretty good but there are pieces of the puzzle that are not available."</b>
Not everyone is pleased with Narayanan's candour. Former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan G. Parthasarathy said it was a serious mistake to say India did not have clinching evidence. "This only strengthens Pakistan's claim that India is making unsubstantiated allegations about the ISI's role," he said.
"The probe is still on and you do not need clinching evidence under our laws. You only need evidence to show the links between the bombers, and those in Pakistan who are behind such acts of terrorism."
Security expert<b> B Raman said, "Unlike in the Mumbai blasts of 1993, where we managed to get material evidence of Pakistan's role, what the police have obtained this time is oral evidence. They have statements. Oral evidence is good enough with corroboration. I am sure the police is working to get more evidence."</b>
...........................
........................
To begin with, India will give Pakistan information on Pakistan-based terrorist groups active in India and ask Pakistan to get back with a report of the action taken against them.<b> "If every time we give them information, we get a negative answer, we will know the mechanism is not working and we will have to see what we can do,"</b> said Narayanan.<b> "Once we feel the mechanism is not working, we will call it off."</b>
He said the joint mechanism was aimed at putting Pakistan "on the spot". Pakistan would be given a "fair opportunity" before India decided whether the mechanism was working or not. India hoped to give Pakistan "specific" locations, names and telephone numbers. <b>"If Pakistan delivers on some, even if not all, then at least we will feel the mechanism is reasonably successful," </b>Narayanan said.
He added that Pakistan had "always told us if you give us the evidence, we will help you with the investigation. Now we are giving them an opportunity to prove in deeds what they have said in words. From our point of view, we see it as an opportunity.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Never seen such fools and can't believe he is heading government and other spy agency.
<b>Mumbai blasts: 'Evidence against ISI not clinching'</b> <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->India has "pretty good" but probably not "clinching" evidence of the involvement of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in the Mumbai train blasts of July 11, National Security Adviser MK Narayanan has said.
<b>âI would hesitate to say we have clinching evidence but we have pretty good evidence,â </b>Narayanan said on the programme Devil's Advocate on the newschannel CNN-IBN. This is the first time any Indian official has spoken about the quality of the evidence against the Pakistani spy agency's role in the Mumbai blasts.
"I think it is as good evidence as we can possibly get in terrorist cases," said Narayanan. <b>"Whether it is clinching, is for the courts (to decide). We have connectivity, linkages, confessions. We have a number of arrests which are pretty good but there are pieces of the puzzle that are not available."</b>
Not everyone is pleased with Narayanan's candour. Former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan G. Parthasarathy said it was a serious mistake to say India did not have clinching evidence. "This only strengthens Pakistan's claim that India is making unsubstantiated allegations about the ISI's role," he said.
"The probe is still on and you do not need clinching evidence under our laws. You only need evidence to show the links between the bombers, and those in Pakistan who are behind such acts of terrorism."
Security expert<b> B Raman said, "Unlike in the Mumbai blasts of 1993, where we managed to get material evidence of Pakistan's role, what the police have obtained this time is oral evidence. They have statements. Oral evidence is good enough with corroboration. I am sure the police is working to get more evidence."</b>
...........................
........................
To begin with, India will give Pakistan information on Pakistan-based terrorist groups active in India and ask Pakistan to get back with a report of the action taken against them.<b> "If every time we give them information, we get a negative answer, we will know the mechanism is not working and we will have to see what we can do,"</b> said Narayanan.<b> "Once we feel the mechanism is not working, we will call it off."</b>
He said the joint mechanism was aimed at putting Pakistan "on the spot". Pakistan would be given a "fair opportunity" before India decided whether the mechanism was working or not. India hoped to give Pakistan "specific" locations, names and telephone numbers. <b>"If Pakistan delivers on some, even if not all, then at least we will feel the mechanism is reasonably successful," </b>Narayanan said.
He added that Pakistan had "always told us if you give us the evidence, we will help you with the investigation. Now we are giving them an opportunity to prove in deeds what they have said in words. From our point of view, we see it as an opportunity.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Never seen such fools and can't believe he is heading government and other spy agency.